Search

Context: Relational continuity is a core value of primary care. Little is known as to how it can be promoted. EQuIP-GP was a 12-month cluster RCT in 36 practices exploring whether financial incentives can improve relational continuity in general practice (GP). Objective: We examined a) how financial incentives are perceived and experienced by patients and GP teams and b) how routines related to relational continuity are influenced by financial incentives. Study Design: Mixed methods case study. Setting: Maximum variation sample of 6 (2 per state) of the 18 EQuIP-GP intervention practices from the Australian states of New South Wales, Victoria and Tasmania. Population: Each practice provided quantitative data on 30 patients aged =55 and qualitative data from patients, GPs, practice nurses (PN) and practice managers (PM). Intervention: Intervention practices received quality-linked financial incentives for offering longer consultations and early post-hospital review for enrolled patients. Outreach facilitators worked with practices to modify continuity routines. Instruments: Baseline practice attributes survey; Patient Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCAT); semi-structured interviews (13 patients, 10 GPs, 1 PN and 5 PMs). The 3 facilitators collected reflective notes of practice visits and participated in post-study interviews. Outcome Measures: Change in pre-post PCAT relational continuity using paired ttests and one-way ANOVA. Qualitative "practice intervention narratives" helped investigate the response to the intervention and concepts about financial incentives. Results. As with the EQuIP-GP trial, there was no change in relational continuity - PCAT and interview data both suggesting continuity was high at baseline. Participants saw relational continuity as a core component of primary care that should not need incentivising, seeing incentives as a "blunt instrument". Both patients and GPs favoured rewarding, rather than incentivising, quality care. Many felt that Equip-GP's incentive model increased attention to pre-existing routines rather than facilitating new ways of working. Conclusions: While financial incentives can help practices identify how existing routines can influence continuity, incentives for this core component of primary care seem better framed as a reward for good practice rather than an incentive for improvement. Further research could explore these issues in practices with lower baseline continuity of care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: People with a history of stroke or heart disease are at increased risk of future stroke; therefore, identification of risk factors by GPs is critical., Objectives: To compare the following among general practice patients with and without a history of stroke or heart disease: (i) self-reported prevalence rates of lifestyle risk factors; (ii) accuracy of GP detection of patient-reported risk factors and (iii) average proportion of patient-reported risk factors detected by GPs., Methods: Consecutive patients attending a participating general practice clinic were invited to participate in a cross-sectional touchscreen survey assessing lifestyle risk factors in 2010-11. The GP of each consenting patient completed a corresponding survey assessing the patient's risk factors. Demographic characteristics of patients and GPs were obtained., Results: Data from 51 GPs and 564 patients were analysed. Patients without a history of stroke or heart disease reported significantly higher rates of smoking (12%) and risky alcohol consumption (56%) than patients with a history of stroke or heart disease (6% and 36%, respectively). Low sensitivity of GP detection of risk factors was found for all risk factors for all patients. Patients with a history of stroke or heart disease have a significantly higher mean proportion of risk factors detected by their GP compared to patients without a history of stroke or heart disease (P = 0.00)., Conclusion: Given low sensitivity and specificity of GP detection of risk factors among patients, alternate methods of identification are needed. Research is required to determine strategies to facilitate secondary care of patients with a history of stroke or heart disease by GPs., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)