Search

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) previous TEAM studies of personal exposure to VOCs for 700 residents in several U.S. cities found that indoor air concentrations were often higher than outdoor levels. Several potential sources of benzene exposure were identified, including environmental tobacco smoke and materials or activities associated with attached garages. Indoor, personal, and outdoor monitoring was conducted at eleven New Jersey homes over multiple 12-hr monitoring periods. One study objective was to assess the impact of attached garages on human exposure to benzene and the variability of benzene exposure across time. Benzene was also measured in several homes inhabited by smokers and in homes without known combustion sources for comparative purposes. At homes with a garage or environmental tobacco smoke, mean indoor and personal benzene concentrations were two to five times higher than outdoor levels at all but one home. Mean personal exposures ranged from 8 to 31 micrograms/m3. Indoor/outdoor ratios were calculated and ranged from 0.8 to 11. Benzene levels in the four garages ranged from 3 to 196 micrograms/m3 and usually were higher than either indoor living areas or personal levels. Multi-zone air exchange rates were measured, and benzene source strengths in each zone were estimated. Garage source strength estimates for benzene ranged from 310 to 52,000 micrograms/h. The mass transfer of benzene from sources in the garage to home living areas was also large in three of the homes, ranging from 730 to 26,000 micrograms/h. Materials or activities in the garage were a source of benzene exposure for the residents in these three homes. Large temporal variations (factors of 2 to 30) were observed in indoor and personal benzene concentrations, indoor/outdoor ratios, and source strengths over the six or ten monitoring periods at each home. Changes in outdoor air benzene levels were an underlying factor in changing exposure levels, with indoor sources further elevating indoor air levels and personal exposures.

Several volatile organic compounds, including tetrachloroethylene, have been found to be nearly ubiquitous in residential indoor environments during previous TEAM studies. Eleven homes in New Jersey were monitored over three or five days to examine the effect of bringing freshly dry-cleaned clothes into the home on indoor air levels and personal exposures to tetrachloroethylene. Indoor air, personal air, and breath concentrations were measured over multiple 12-hrs periods before and after dry-cleaned clothes were introduced into nine of the homes. No dry-cleaned clothes were introduced into the two remaining homes. Outdoor air tetrachloroethylene concentrations were measured at six of the eleven homes. Indoor/outdoor concentration ratios and source strengths were calculated at the six homes with outdoor measurements. Elevated indoor air levels and human exposures to tetrachloroethylene were measured at seven of the nine homes with dry-cleaned clothes. Indoor air concentrations reached 300 micrograms/m3 in one home and elevated indoor levels persisted for at least 48 hrs in all seven homes. Indoor/outdoor tetrachloroethylene concentration ratios exceeded 100 for the four homes with both dry-cleaned clothes and outdoor measurements. Maximum source strengths ranged from 16 to 69 mg/hr in these homes and did not directly correspond to the number of dry-cleaned garments brought into the home. Breath levels of tetrachloroethylene increased two to six-fold for participants living in seven homes with increased indoor air levels. Indoor air, personal air, and breath tetrachloroethylene concentrations were significantly related (0.05 level) to the number of garments introduced divided by the home volume.

Indoor/outdoor relationships were identified for selected volatile organic compounds over the course of five consecutive days in three homes. Indoor sources of individual compounds were meant in one or more homes. Personal monitoring samples and breath analyses were obtained from volunteers in each home. A period of outdoor air stagnation occurred during one evening and morning of the study. Two results from the study that must be considered in future investigations of VOC exposure are 1) periods conducive to accumulating outdoor VOC can make substantial contributions to indoor values and 2) for homes without indoor sources of individual compounds the indoor values are driven by the outdoor values of a VOC. The primary results do not contradict previous TEAM studies which indicate that when indoor sources of a particular VOC are present the personal exposure and microenvironmental exposures are effected primarily by indoor contributions. Future comparisons of external exposure values with human breath analysis studies must be designed to more closely reflect the time interval associated with the half time of elimination for a particular VOC.

Twenty volatile organic compounds were measured in the personal air and drinking water of 350 New Jersey residents in the fall of 1981. Two consecutive 12-hour integrated personal air samples and two tap water samples were collected from each participant. At the end of the 24-hour monitoring period, each participant supplied a sample of exhaled breath. Simultaneous outdoor samples were collected in 100 residential locations in two cities. Eleven compounds were present much of the time in air, but only four (the trihalomethanes) in water; wide ranges of exposures (three to four orders of magnitude) were noted for most compounds. Ten of 11 compounds displayed significant correlations between air exposures and breath concentrations; the 11th (chloroform) was correlated with drinking water exposures. It was concluded that breath measurements are a feasible, cost-effective, and highly sensitive way to determine environmental and occupational exposures to volatile organic compounds.

EPA's TEAM Study has measured exposures to 20 volatile organic compounds in personal air, outdoor air, drinking water, and breath of approximately 400 residents of New Jersey, North Carolina, and North Dakota. All residents were selected by a probability sampling scheme to represent 128,000 inhabitants of Elizabeth and Bayonne, New Jersey, 131,000 residents of Greensboro, North Carolina, and 7000 residents of Devils Lake, North Dakota. Participants carried a personal monitor to collect two 12-hr air samples and gave a breath sample at the end of the day. Two consecutive 12-hr outdoor air samples were also collected on identical Tenax cartridges in the backyards of some of the participants. About 5000 samples were collected, of which 1500 were quality control samples. Ten compounds were often present in personal air and breath samples at all locations. Personal exposures were consistently higher than outdoor concentrations for these chemicals and were sometimes 10 times the outdoor concentrations. Indoor sources appeared to be responsible for much of the difference. Breath concentrations also often exceeded outdoor concentrations and correlated more strongly with personal exposures than with outdoor concentrations. Some activities (smoking, visiting dry cleaners or service stations) and occupations (chemical, paint, and plastics plants) were associated with significantly elevated exposures and breath levels for certain toxic chemicals. Homes with smokers had significantly increased benzene and styrene levels in indoor air. Residence near major point sources did not affect exposure.

Personal exposures and breath concentrations of approximately 20 volatile organics were measured for 200 smokers and 322 nonsmokers in New Jersey and California. Smokers displayed significantly elevated breath levels of benzene, styrene, ethylbenzene, m + p-xylene, o-xylene, and octane. Significant increases in breath concentration with number of cigarettes smoked were noted for the first four aromatic compounds. Based on direct measurements of benzene in mainstream cigarette smoke, it is calculated that a typical smoker inhales 2 mg benzene daily, compared to 0.2 mg/day for the nonsmoker. Thus, cigarette smoking may be the most important source of exposure to benzene for about 50 million citizens of the United States. Passive smokers exposed at work had significantly elevated levels of aromatics in their breath. Indoor air levels in homes with smokers were significantly greater than in nonsmoking homes during fall and winter but not during spring and summer. The average annual increase in homes with smokers was 3.6 microgram/m3 for benzene and 0.5 microgram/m3 for styrene--an approximate 50% relative increase in each case. Thus, exposure to benzene and styrene may be increased for the approximately 60% of children and other nonsmokers living in homes with smokers.