Search

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is evolving rapidly and is increasingly being adopted in the treatment of aortic valve disease. The goal of this study was to examine regional differences in surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and TAVI across Atlantic Canada., Methods: We identified all patients who underwent SAVR or TAVI between Jan. 1, 2010, and Dec. 31, 2014, in New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Newfoundland and Labrador. Data obtained included patient demographic characteristics and surgical procedure details. We performed univariate descriptive analyses and calculated crude and age- and sex-adjusted incidence rates., Results: A total of 3042 patients underwent SAVR or TAVI during the study period, 1491 in Nova Scotia, 1042 in New Brunswick and 509 in Newfoundland and Labrador. Patient demographic characteristics were similar across regions. A much higher proportion of patients in Newfoundland and Labrador (43.6%) than in Nova Scotia (4.2%) or New Brunswick (13.6%) received a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve. Rates of TAVI increased over the study period, with New Brunswick adopting their program before Nova Scotia (144 v. 74 procedures). Adjusted rates of all AVR procedures remained stable in Nova Scotia (40-50 per 100 000 people). Adjusted rates were lower in New Brunswick and Newfoundland and Labrador than in Nova Scotia; they increased slowly in New Brunswick over the study period., Conclusion: Despite geographical proximity and similar patient demographic characteristics, there existed regional differences in the management of aortic valve disease within Atlantic Canada. Further study is required to determine whether the observed differences in age- and sex-adjusted rates of AVR may be explained by geographical disease-related differences, varying practice patterns or barriers in access to care.

Background: Numerous studies have examined the effect of geographic place of residence on access to cardiovascular care, but few have examined their effect on outcomes after cardiac operations. This study examined the effect of geographic place of residence on in-hospital and 30-day outcomes after cardiac operations., Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing nonemergency cardiac operations at a single institution between April 2004 and March 2011. Geographic place of residence was defined as the driving distance from the patient's home to the tertiary cardiac care center divided into the following categories: 0 to 50 km, 50 to 100 km, 100 to 150 km, 150 to 200 km, 200 to 250 km, and more than 250 km. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the independent effect of driving distance on in-hospital and 30-day outcomes., Results: The final study population included 4,493 patients, of whom 3,897 (86.7%) had 30-day follow-up. After adjusting for differences among patient groups, no consistent relationship existed between distance and in-hospital outcomes. However, increased distance beyond 100 km was significantly associated with a greater risk of adverse outcomes at 30 days (0 to 50 km: referent; 50 to 100 km: odds ratio, 1.16 [95% confidence interval, 0.83 to 1.62]; 100 to 150 km: 1.32 [1.05 to 1.65], 150 to 200 km: 1.68 [1.33 to 2.11], 200 to 250 km: 1.41 [1.06 to 1.88], and >250 km: 1.30 [1.04 to 1.63])., Conclusions: Patients who live at an increased distance from the tertiary cardiac care center are more likely to have worse 30-day outcomes after cardiac operations. Further study is required to determine the mechanisms underlying this relationship and how such inequalities may be minimized., (Copyright © 2015 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)