1. Comparison of Package Insert versus Real World Safety Data from Branded Icosapent Ethyl Users: A Select Analysis Utilizing MarketScan Data.
- Author
-
Nelson, John, Ganda, Om, Soran, Handrean, Prashanth, Tarun, Justice, Nilima, Philip, Sephy, and Hansen, Richard
- Subjects
DRUG side effects ,ETHANOL ,EDEMA ,CONFERENCES & conventions ,ATRIAL fibrillation ,HEMORRHAGE ,CONSTIPATION ,DRUG labeling - Abstract
Amarin Pharma, Inc. The REDUCE-IT clinical trial demonstrated significant reductions in cardiovascular events and reported atrial fibrillation (Afib), bleeding, constipation, and peripheral edema as potential adverse events (AEs) with icosapent ethyl (IPE) [Vascepa®/Vazkepa®]. It is unclear how the frequency of these AEs compares with real world IPE experience. To compare the frequency of select AEs with IPE across data sources, including the REDUCE-IT clinical trial, product labels, and estimates derived from real world data (RWD). Data were extracted from the REDUCE-IT publications and branded USA and/or Europe IPE labels to establish the frequency of Afib, bleeding, constipation, and peripheral edema. For comparison, real world data (RWD) estimates were derived from retrospective cohort studies of the MarketScan Commercial Claims data from the USA. New IPE users were followed for up to 4 years to identify AEs based on ICD-10 diagnosis and procedure codes. The percentages of patients experiencing each event were compared descriptively across REDUCE-IT, product labels, and RWD analyses. For each of the events considered, IPE AE rates documented in REDUCE-IT and both the USA and/or Europe labels were higher than the rates of the same events observed in RWD. The percentage of people with each documented event across data sources is as follows: Afib – REDUCE-IT 5.3%, label 5.8%, RWD 1.0%; bleeding – REDUCE-IT 11.8%, label 11.8%, RWD 4.3%; constipation – REDUCE-IT 5.4%, label 5.4%, RWD 1.3%; peripheral edema – REDUCE-IT 6.5%, label 7.8%, RWD 1.9%. Estimates provided by RWD paralleled the trial-based estimates in terms of rank order frequency, but the magnitude of RWD estimates was consistently 3-5 times lower than the REDUCE-IT trial or product label. RWD demonstrated trends in the frequency of IPE-labeled AEs that are consistent with, but 3-5x lower than, trial and labeling data. Potential reasons for consistently lower AE rates in RWD compared with trial data may be related to differences in how AEs are assessed and documented in the real world vs. in trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF