1. Real-world overall survival after alternative dosing for pembrolizumab in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: A nationwide retrospective cohort study with a non-inferiority primary objective.
- Author
-
Grit GF, van Geffen E, Malmberg R, van Leeuwen R, Böhringer S, Jm Smit H, Brocken P, Fh Eijsink J, Dronkers E, Gal P, Jaarsma E, Jhm van Drie-Pierik R, Mp Eldering-Heldens A, Machteld Wymenga AN, Gm Mol P, Zwaveling J, and Hilarius D
- Subjects
- Humans, Retrospective Studies, Male, Female, Aged, Middle Aged, Netherlands epidemiology, Aged, 80 and over, Survival Rate, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung drug therapy, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung mortality, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized administration & dosage, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized therapeutic use, Lung Neoplasms drug therapy, Lung Neoplasms mortality, Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological administration & dosage, Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological therapeutic use
- Abstract
Background: High and increasing expenses on pembrolizumab ask for more cost-effective and sustainable treatment strategies to improve affordability of healthcare. Therefore, a part of the Dutch hospitals implemented an alternative, partially lower, weight-based dosing protocol for pembrolizumab. This provided the unique opportunity to compare the overall survival (OS) of the alternative pembrolizumab dosing protocol to standard dosing using a nationwide registry in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients., Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study with a non-inferiority primary objective. Forty hospitals in the Dutch Medication Audit and Dutch Lung Cancer Audit treated 1966 patients with NSCLC with first line pembrolizumab (mono- or combination therapy) between Jan 1st 2021, and Mar 31st, 2023. Alternative weight-based pembrolizumab dosing (100/150/200 mg Q3W or 200/300/400 mg Q6W) was administered to 604 patients, and 1362 patients received standard pembrolizumab dosing (200 mg Q3W or 400 mg Q6W). A Cox proportional hazard model with selected covariates was used to compare the OS between alternative and standard dosing protocols. The non-inferiority margin was set at a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.2 for OS. Non-inferiority is established by showing that the upper limit of the 95 % confidence interval (CI) of the HR of OS is smaller or equal to 1.2., Results: Distribution of age (66.7 years +/-9.4), sex (45 % female) and treatment combinations were similar for both groups, comorbidity score was higher in the standard group. Median daily dose in the alternative dosing group was 22 % lower compared to the standard dosing group, 7.14 mg/day (interquartile range (IQR):5.48-8.04 mg/day) vs. 9.15 mg/day (IQR:8.33-9.52 mg/day), respectively. Alternative dosing was non-inferior to standard dosing regarding overall survival (adjusted HR 0.83, 95 %CI:0.69-1.003)., Conclusion: This large, retrospective real-world analysis supports the hypothesis that the alternative, partially lower pembrolizumab dosing protocol in NSCLC maintains treatment effectiveness while reducing treatment costs., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: [Ruben Malmberg has received payment for lectures from BMS. Roelof van Leeuwen has received grants from BMS and Pfizer, consulting fees from BMS, MDS, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, AstraZeneca, and Roche, and payment for presentations and attending meetings from AstraZeneca. Hans Smit is a member on the advisory board of BMS and MSD and is a member representative of the Dutch scientific committee for pulmonary disease (no payments involved). Juliëtte Zwaveling has received a grant from AstraZeneca. All other authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper]., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF