Search

Background: An important focus of post-stroke physical therapy is to improve walking and walking capacity. However, many people after stroke experience difficulties with gait-related participation, which includes more than walking capacity alone. Gait-related participation involves walking with a participation goal and requires to deal with changes in the environment during walking and perform dual tasks, for example. Objective: To explore barriers and facilitators for gait-related participation from the perspective of people after stroke. This knowledge can contribute to the development of effective interventions to improve gait-related participation. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted to investigate how people after stroke experience gait-related participation. Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed, anonymized, and analyzed thematically. Barriers and facilitators were categorized according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework. Results: Twenty-one people after stroke participated. Median age was 65 years, median time since stroke 16 weeks. Barriers were reported in movement-related functions, cognitive functions, mobility, personal factors, and environmental factors. Facilitators were found on participation level and in personal and environmental factors, such as motivation and family support. Conclusion: People after stroke who were physically able to walk independently still described multiple barriers to gait-related participation in all components of the ICF framework. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective After stroke, people experience difficulties with walking that lead to restrictions in participation in daily life. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of virtual reality gait training (VRT) compared to non–virtual reality gait training (non-VRT) on participation in community-living people after stroke. Methods In this assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial with 2 parallel groups, people were included between 2 weeks and 6 months after stroke and randomly assigned to the VRT group or non-VRT group. Participants assigned to the VRT group received training on the Gait Real-time Analysis Interactive Lab (GRAIL), and participants assigned to the non-VRT group received treadmill training and functional gait exercises without virtual reality. Both training interventions consisted of 12 30-minute sessions during 6 weeks. The primary outcome was participation measured with the restrictions subscale of the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation (USER-P) 3 months postintervention. Secondary outcomes included subjective physical functioning, functional mobility, walking ability, dynamic balance, walking activity, fatigue, anxiety and depression, falls efficacy, and quality of life. Results Twenty-eight participants were randomly assigned to the VRT group and 27 to the non-VRT group, of whom 25 and 22 attended 75% or more of the training sessions, respectively. No significant differences between the groups were found over time for the USER-P restrictions subscale (1.23; 95% CI = −0.76 to 3.23) or secondary outcome measures. Patients' experiences with VRT were positive, and no serious adverse events were related to the interventions. Conclusions The effect of VRT was not statistically different from non-VRT in improving participation in community-living people after stroke. Impact Although outcomes were not statistically different, treadmill-based VRT was a safe and well-tolerated intervention that was positively rated by people after stroke. VR training might, therefore, be a valuable addition to stroke rehabilitation. Lay Summary VRT is feasible and was positively experienced by people after stroke. However, VRT was not more effective than non-VRT for improving walking ability and participation after stroke. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Free-living walking activity and its contributing factors in ambulatory people with stroke is poorly investigated. Objective: Evaluating free-living walking activity and identifying factors associated with free-living walking activity. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, participants wore an accelerometer to measure their level of walking activity. They also completed the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and the Timed Up and Go test for functional balance, the Falls Efficacy Scale, the 10-Metre Walk Test and the Geriatric Depression Scale to investigate the relation between the performance tests and walking activity. Results: The 38 analyzed participants were on average 62 (±11.4) years old and 66 (IQR 64.8) months post stroke. They took an average of 3048.3 ± 1983.1 steps, had 123.3 ± 61.3 walking bouts a day and walked for 32.5 ± 18.2 min a day. Their average speed was 90.3 ± 13.8 steps a minute. The multivariate linear analysis showed that the BBS was the only determinant that was significantly related to all outcomes, except walking bouts. Conclusion: Free-living walking activity levels in ambulatory people with chronic stroke are low. The BBS is an independent significant predictor of free-living walking activity. Free-living walking activity can be expressed in different outcomes measured by accelerometry. Free-living walking activity levels in ambulatory people with chronic stroke are low, therefore support to sustain walking in the own environment should be part of the rehabilitation program after stroke. Balance is an important related factor to free-living walking activity which needs attention during rehabilitation after stroke. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Long-term splinting, using static orthoses to prevent contractures, is widely accepted in stroke patients with paresis of the upper limb. A number of stroke patients complain about increased pain and spasticity, which leads to the nonuse of the orthosis and a risk of developing a clenched fist. Objectives. Evaluating long-term use of static hand-wrist orthoses and experienced comfort in chronic stroke patients. Methods. Eleven stroke patients who were advised to use a static orthosis for at least one year ago were included. Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted to explore the long-term use and experienced comfort with the orthosis. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results. After at least one year, seven patients still wore the orthosis for the prescribed hours per day. Two patients were unable to wear the orthosis 8 hours per day, due to poor comfort. Two patients stopped using the orthosis because of an increase in spasticity or pain. Conclusions. These pilot data suggest that a number of stroke patients cannot tolerate a static orthosis over a long-term period because of discomfort. Without appropriate treatment opportunities, these patients will remain at risk of developing a clenched fist and will experience problems with daily activities and hygiene maintenance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A stroke often results in gait impairments, activity limitations and restricted participation in daily life. Virtual reality (VR) has shown to be beneficial for improving gait ability after stroke. Previous studies regarding VR focused mainly on improvements in functional outcomes. As participation in daily life is an important goal for rehabilitation after stroke, it is of importance to investigate if VR gait training improves participation. The primary aim of this study is to examine the effect of VR gait training on participation in community-living people after stroke., Methods/design: The ViRTAS study comprises a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial with two parallel groups. Fifty people between 2 weeks and 6 months after stroke, who experience constraints with walking in daily life, are randomly assigned to the virtual reality gait training (VRT) group or the non-virtual reality gait training (non-VRT) group. Both training interventions consist of 12 30-min sessions in an outpatient rehabilitation clinic during 6 weeks. Assessments are performed at baseline, post intervention and 3 months post intervention. The primary outcome is participation measured with the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation (USER-P). Secondary outcomes are subjective physical functioning, functional mobility, walking ability, walking activity, fatigue, anxiety and depression, falls efficacy and quality of life., Discussion: The results of the study provide insight into the effect of VR gait training on participation after stroke., Trial Registration: Netherlands National Trial Register, Identifier NTR6215 . Registered on 3 February 2017.

Introduction: Effects of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with severely impaired health status are poorly documented since these patients are usually excluded from clinical trials. This retrospective, observational study aims to study the impact of disease on health status and the effects of PR on COPD patients referred to a tertiary center for PR in The Netherlands., Methods: Between June 2006 and June 2010, 437 patients with COPD were allocated to our intensive, comprehensive PR program. Patients participated in this interdisciplinary program for 12 weeks for a weekly average of 20-25 hours. Before and directly after, several measures of physical performance and health-related quality of life were determined., Results: At baseline, most patients (75%) had a Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stage of III-IV. Peak exercise performance on a cycle ergometer was on average reduced to 43 ± 29 Watt, and health-related quality of life was significantly impaired, with a total score on the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) of 66. Health-care utilization in the year preceding PR was very high. After rehabilitation, all outcome measures improved statistically significantly (P < 0.001). Exercise performance measured with the 6 minute walking distance test improved clinically significantly in 68% of the patients, whereas 75% of the patients showed a clinically meaningful improvement in quality of life as measured with the SGRQ. Multiple regression analysis revealed that 19% of the variation in responses on the 6 minute walking distance test and the SGRQ could be explained on the basis of baseline characteristics., Conclusion: The present study provides data to indicate that COPD patients may substantially benefit from rehabilitation in a tertiary pulmonary rehabilitation center, despite a severely impaired health status and high level of health-care utilization, in which prior treatment in primary and secondary care have failed to improve health status. Individual rehabilitation responses can only partially be predicted on the basis of baseline characteristics. Consequently, no firm conclusions can be drawn from this study with respect to the selection of candidates that could be deemed eligible for this rehabilitation program when entering the program.

Purpose: An intervention for persons with neuromuscular diseases (NMD) or multiple sclerosis (MS) who experienced severe fatigue was developed which aimed at educating participants in maintaining a balance between capacity and load in their daily activities. This pilot study evaluated the results of this intervention., Methods: Persons with NMD or MS who experienced severe fatigue were included. Outcome measures were: fatigue (Fatigue Severity Scale), health-related quality of life (HRQoL; SF-36) and self-efficacy (ALCOS-16). Changes in scores between the start of the intervention (T0) and 3 months post-intervention (T1) were tested with the Wilcoxon tests in the complete group and in subgroups (gender, education, high/low self-efficacy)., Results: Forty-three persons participated. Significant improvements of HRQoL were found for the domains role-physical, mental health and general health perceptions. Subgroup analyses showed more improvement in males (fatigue, role-physical, vitality, bodily pain, general health perceptions), participants with lower education (role-physical, vitality) and participants with low self-efficacy at T0 (self-efficacy, mental health, general health perceptions) than in females, participants with higher education and participants with higher initial self-efficacy., Conclusion: This pilot-study provides preliminary evidence for the effectiveness of a group educational intervention in improving HRQoL without increasing fatigue in persons with NMD and MS.

Objective: To develop a hierarchical scale that measures activity limitations in walking in patients with lower-extremity disorders who live at home., Design: Cross-sectional study., Setting: Orthopedic workshops and outpatient clinics of secondary and tertiary care centers., Participants: Patients (N=981; mean age +/- standard deviation, 58.6+/-15.4 y; 46% men) living at home, with different lower-extremity disorders: stroke, poliomyelitis, osteoarthritis, amputation, complex regional pain syndrome type I, and diabetic and degenerative foot disorders., Interventions: Not applicable., Main Outcome Measures: (1) Fit of the monotone homogeneity model, indicating whether items can be used for measuring patients; (2) fit of the double monotonicity model, indicating invariant (hierarchical) item ordering; (3) intratest reliability, indicating repeatability of the sum score; (4) robustness, addressing the clinimetric properties within subgroups of patients; and (5) differential item functioning, addressing the validity of comparisons between subgroups of patients., Results: Thirty-five of 41 dichotomous items had (1) good fit of the monotone homogeneity model (coefficient H=.50), (2) good fit of the double monotonicity model (coefficient H(T)=.33), (3) good intratest reliability (coefficient rho=.95), (4) satisfactory robustness (within subgroups of patients defined by age, sex, and diagnosis), and (5) some differential item functioning (6 items in amputees compared with nonamputees)., Conclusions: A hierarchical scale, with excellent scaling characteristics, was developed to measure activity limitations in walking in patients with lower-extremity disorders who live at home. The measurements should be interpreted cautiously when making comparisons between amputees and nonamputees.