Search

Purpose: To determine clinical phenotypes, evolution and genetic background of a large family with a combination of two unusual forms of reflex epilepsies., Method: Phenotyping was performed in eighteen family members (10 F, 8 M) including standardized EEG recordings with intermittent photic stimulation (IPS). Genetic analyses (linkage scans, Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) and Functional studies) were performed using photoparoxysmal EEG responses (PPRs) as affection status., Results: The proband suffered from speaking induced jaw-jerks and increasing limb jerks evoked by flickering sunlight since about 50 years of age. Three of her family members had the same phenotype. Generalized PPRs were found in seven members (six above 50 years of age) with myoclonus during the PPR. Evolution was typical: Sensitivity to lights with migraine-like complaints around adolescence, followed by jerks evoked by lights and spontaneously with dropping of objects, and strong increase of light sensitivity and onset of talking induced jaw jerks around 50 years. Linkage analysis showed suggestive evidence for linkage to four genomic regions. All photosensitive family members shared a heterozygous R129C mutation in the SCNM1 gene that regulates splicing of voltage gated ion channels. Mutation screening of 134 unrelated PPR patients and 95 healthy controls, did not replicate these findings., Conclusion: This family presents a combination of two rare reflex epilepsies. Genetic analysis favors four genomic regions and points to a shared SCNM1 mutation that was not replicated in a general cohort of photosensitive subjects. Further genetic studies in families with similar combination of features are warranted., (Copyright © 2015 British Epilepsy Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The EFHC1 gene, encoding a protein with a Ca(2+)-sensing EF-hand motif, is localized at 6p12 and was recently reported as mutated in six Mexican juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) families linked to this region. We had previously confirmed linkage between JME and 6p11-12 in 18 Dutch families, and shown exclusionary lod scores at 6p21.3. We therefore evaluated the relevance of EFHC1 in our set of 6p11-12-linked families., Methods: We screened all coding and regulatory regions of EFHC1 by direct sequencing, and the detected variants were tested in a case-control association study., Results: We found none of the five mutations previously reported in the Mexican families, but identified nine variants, three of which are novel: 5' upstream region (c.-146_147delGC), nonsynonymous (R159W, R182H, M448T, I619L), intronic (IVS3 + 10A>G, IVS8 + 175_176delTT, IVS10 + 59C>T), and 3' UTR (c.+121C>A). These variants did not cosegregate with JME and did not account for the observed linkage at the 6p11-12 locus. Furthermore, no significant association was detected between JME and these variants in 112 unrelated patients and 180 controls. Finally, none of the mutations reported in Mexican families was found in 100 unrelated patients., Conclusions: We found no evidence that EFHC1 is a major genetic risk factor for JME susceptibility in Dutch patients. The EFHC1 variants reported in Mexican families may be mendelian variants specific for those families, suggesting that for Dutch patients and possibly many other populations, the main disease variant at the 6p11-12 is yet to be identified.