Search

The attainment of target hemoglobin levels in hemodialysis patients is low. Several factors play a role, such as hyporesponsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA), but also suboptimal prescribing of ESA and iron. The goal of this study was to investigate if a pharmacist-managed dosing algorithm for darbepoetin alfa (DA) and iron sucrose improves the attainment of target hemoglobin levels. In this randomized controlled trial, 200 hemodialysis patients from a Dutch teaching hospital were included. In the intervention group (n = 100), a pharmacist monthly provided dose recommendations for DA and iron sucrose based on dosing algorithms. The control group (n = 100) received usual care. In the intervention group, the percentage per patient within the target range (PTR) for hemoglobin (target range 6.8-7.4 mmol/L) and iron status was higher than in the control group (for hemoglobin median 38.5% vs 23.1%, P = .001 and for iron status median 21.1% vs 8.3%, P = .003). The percentage of high hemoglobin levels (>8.1 mmol/L) was lower in the intervention group (median 0.0% vs 7.7%, P = .034). The weekly dose of DA was lower in the intervention group (median 34.0 vs 46.9 mcg, P = .020), whereas iron dose was higher (median 75 vs 0 mg). No difference was found for the percentage of hemoglobin levels below the target range. In conclusion, a pharmacist-managed dosing algorithm for DA and iron sucrose increased the attainment of target levels for hemoglobin and iron status, reduced the percentage of high hemoglobin levels, and was associated with a lower DA and a higher iron sucrose dose., (© 2020 The Authors. Pharmacology Research & Perspectives published by British Pharmacological Society and American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Although the efficacy of iron sucrose (IS) and ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) in treating anemia in hemodialysis (HD) patients has been studied individually, a comparison of these two intravenous iron formulations has not yet been performed in HD patients., Methods: We performed a retrospective audit on records of 221 stable HD patients from different HD centers in the Netherlands, who were switched from IS to FCM on a 1:1 ratio. To assess the effect of the switch on iron status parameters, data from 3 time points before and 3 time points after the switch were analyzed using linear mixed effects models. Subanalyses were done in 2 subgroups of patients anemic or iron deficient at baseline., Results: Hemoglobin increased in all groups (anemic [1.4 g/dL, P < 0.001] iron deficient [0.6 g/dL, P < 0.001]), while the weekly iron dose was significantly lower when patients received FCM compared to IS (48 vs 55 mg/week, P = 0.04). Furthermore, serum ferritin and transferrin saturation increased in all groups (anemic [64 μg/L, 5.0%, P < 0.001] iron deficient [76 μg/L, 3.6%, P < 0.001]). Finally, the darbepoetin α dose decreased significantly in all groups (anemic [- 16 μg/wk., P = 0.01] iron deficient [- 11 μg/wk., P < 0.001])., Conclusions: In this real-life study in HD patients, a switch from IS to FCM resulted in an improvement of iron status parameters despite a lower weekly dose of FCM. Furthermore, the ESA dose was reduced during FCM, while hemoglobin levels increased.