Search

Introduction: In fast-track metabolic surgery, the window to identify complications is narrow. Postoperative checklists can be useful tools in the decision-making of safe early discharge. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of a checklist used in metabolic surgery. Methods: Retrospective data from June 2018 to January 2021 was collected on all patients that underwent metabolic surgery in a high-volume bariatric hospital in the Netherlands. Patients without an available checklist were excluded. The primary outcome was major complications and the secondary outcomes were minor complications, readmission, and unplanned hospital visits within 30 days postoperatively. Results: Major complications within 30 days postoperatively occurred in 62/1589 (3.9%) of the total included patients. An advise against early discharge was significantly more seen in patients with major complications compared to those without major complications (90.3% versus 48.1%, P < 0.001, respectively), and a negative checklist (advice for discharge) had a negative predictive value of 99.2%. The area under the curve for the total checklist was 0.80 (P < 0.001). Using a cut-off value of ≥3 positive points, the sensitivity and specificity were 65% and 82%, respectively. Individual parameters from the checklist: oral intake, mobilization, calf pain, willingness for discharge, heart rate, drain (>30 ml/24 h), hemoglobin, and leukocytes count were also significantly different between groups. Conclusion: This checklist is a valuable tool to decide whether patients can be safely discharged early. Heart rate appeared to be the most predictive parameter for the development of major complications. Future studies should conduct prediction models to identify patients at risk for major complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: For metabolic laparoscopic surgery, higher pressures up to 20 mmHg are often used to create a surgical field of sufficient quality. This randomized pilot study aimed to determine the feasibility, safety and tolerability of low intraabdominal pressure (IAP) and deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) to reduce postoperative pain.Methods: In a teaching hospital in the Netherlands, 62 patients eligible for a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) were randomized into one of four groups in a 2 × 2 factorial design: deep/moderate NMB and standard (20 mmHg)/low IAP (12 mmHg). Patient and surgical team were blinded. Primary outcome measure was the surgical field quality, scored on the Leiden-Surgical Rating Scale (L-SRS). Secondary outcome measures were (serious) adverse events, duration of surgery and postoperative pain.Results: 62 patients were included. L-SRS was good or perfect in all patients that were operated under standard IAP with deep or moderate NMB. In 40% of patients with low IAP and deep NMB, an increase in IAP was needed to improve surgical overview. In patients with low IAP and moderate NMB, IAP was increased to improve surgical overview in 40%, and in 75% of these cases a deep NMB was requested to further improve the surgical overview. Median duration of surgery was 38 min (IQR34-40 min) in the group with standard IAP and moderate NMB and 52 min (IQR46-55 min) in the group with low IAP and deep NMB.Conclusions: The combination of moderate NMB and low IAP can create insufficient surgical overview. Larger trials are needed to corroborate the findings of this study.Trial Registration: Dutch Trial Register: Trial NL7050, registered 28 May 2018. https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/7050 . [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Metabolic syndrome is a modern world's major health hazard related to comorbidities like type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Bariatric surgery is well known to lower this health risk in patients with obesity. There is a need for an objective measure to assess the intended reduction in health hazard and indirectly the eligibility for bariatric surgery. The Metabolic Health Index (MHI) quantitatively summarizes the cumulative impact of the metabolic syndrome on health status on a scale from 1 to 6. This study describes the use of the MHI as a supportive tool in the decision for and outcome assessment of bariatric surgery. The general usability of the MHI was tested by extending its application to patient data of five other bariatric centers in the Netherlands. Retrospective laboratory and national bariatric quality registry data of 11,501 patients were collected. The quantification of (improvement in) metabolic health burden as measured by the MHI was independent of the dataset that was used to derive the MHI model. Patients with MHI > 2.8 prior to surgery improved significantly more in MHI 12 mo after surgery compared to patients with MHI ≤ 2.8 (1.1 compared to 0.4 MHI points, respectively; P < 0.001). The MHI is robust between centers and is suitable for general use in clinical decision-making. As changes in MHI over time reflect metabolic health alterations, it is suitable as an outcome measure of surgery. An MHI cut-off value of 2.8 helps to predict the likelihood of significant improvement after surgery, independent of body mass index and known metabolic comorbidities. • The multicenter validation (n = 11,501) showed that the Metabolic Health Index (MHI) is robust between centers. • MHI cut-off value of 2.8 helps discriminate metabolically 'healthy' from 'unhealthy'. • Changes in MHI over time reflect metabolic alterations, independent of body mass index. • MHI is suitable for use as an outcome measure and institutional performance indicator. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To optimize the postoperative phase following bariatric surgery, the enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery pathway (ERABS) has been developed. The aim of ERABS is to create a care path that is as safe, efficient and patient-friendly as possible. Continuous evaluation and optimization of ERABS are important to ensure a safe treatment path and may result in better outcomes. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing bariatric surgery over 2014-2017, during which the ERABS protocol was continuously evaluated and optimized., Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. Data were collected from patients undergoing a primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy between January 2014 and December 2017. Outcomes were early complications, unplanned hospital revisits, readmissions, duration of surgery and length of hospital stay., Results: 2889 patients underwent a primary bariatric procedure in a single center. There was a significant decrease in minor complications over the years from 7.0 to 1.9% (p < 0.001). Hospital revisit rates decreased after 2015 (p < 0.001). Readmission rates decreased over time (p < 0.001). The mean duration of surgery decreased from 52 (in 2014) to 41 (in 2017) minutes (p < 0.001). Median length of hospital stay decreased from 1.8 to 1.5 days in 2015 (p = 0.002) and remained stable since., Conclusion: An improvement of the ERABS protocol was associated with a decrease in minor complication rates, number of unplanned hospital revisits and readmission rates after primary bariatric procedures.

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is considered the 'gold standard' for surgical treatment of morbid obesity. It is hypothesised that reducing the length of the common limb positively affects the magnitude and preservation of weight loss but may also impose a risk of malnutrition. The aim of this study was to compare patients' nutrient and vitamin deficiencies in standard RYGB with a very long Roux limb RYGB (VLRL-RYGB). This study was part of the multicentre randomised controlled trial (Dutch Common Channel Trial), including 444 patients undergoing an RYGB or a VLRL-RYGB. Laboratory results, use of multivitamin supplements and reoperations were collected at baseline and 1 year postoperative. Primary outcome measure was nutrient deficiency after 1 year postoperative. Secondary outcome measure was the reoperation rate due to malabsorption. In total, 227 patients underwent RYGB and 196 patients underwent VLRL-RYGB. Most common deficiencies at 1 year postoperative were ferritin (17·2-18·2 %), Fe (23·4-35·6 %), K (7·4-15·2 %), vitamin B12 (9·0-9·9 %) and vitamin D (22·7-34·5 %). Patients undergoing VLRL-RYGB had slightly but significantly lower levels of Ca, Fe and vitamin D compared with those undergoing RYGB at 1 year postoperative, but significantly higher levels of folic acid and Na. Reoperation rates due to malabsorption were not significantly different between RYGB (2/227, 0·9 %) and VLRL-RYGB (7/196, 3·6 %) (P = 0·088). We concluded that patients undergoing VLRL-RYGB had significantly lower levels of Ca, Fe and vitamin D compared with those undergoing RYGB at 1 year postoperative, but higher levels of folic acid and Na. Reoperation rates did not differ. Close monitoring on nutrient deficiencies should be performed in patients undergoing VLRL-RYGB.