1. Clinical implications of airway obstruction with normal or low FEV 1 in childhood and adolescence.
- Author
-
Koefoed HJL, Wang G, Gehring U, Ekstrom S, Kull I, Vermeulen R, Boer JMA, Bergstrom A, Koppelman GH, Melén E, Vonk JM, and Hallberg J
- Subjects
- Humans, Child, Forced Expiratory Volume physiology, Adolescent, Male, Female, Vital Capacity physiology, Sweden epidemiology, Prevalence, Cross-Sectional Studies, Bronchial Hyperreactivity physiopathology, Bronchial Hyperreactivity epidemiology, Netherlands epidemiology, Asthma physiopathology, Asthma epidemiology, Respiratory Sounds physiopathology, Airway Obstruction physiopathology, Spirometry
- Abstract
Background: Airway obstruction is defined by spirometry as a low forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV
1 ) to forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio. This impaired ratio may originate from a low FEV1 (classic) or a normal FEV1 in combination with a large FVC (dysanaptic). The clinical implications of dysanaptic obstruction during childhood and adolescence in the general population remain unclear., Aims: To investigate the association between airway obstruction with a low or normal FEV1 in childhood and adolescence, and asthma, wheezing and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR)., Methods: In the BAMSE (Barn/Child, Allergy, Milieu, Stockholm, Epidemiology; Sweden) and PIAMA (Prevention and Incidence of Asthma and Mite Allergy; the Netherlands) birth cohorts, obstruction (FEV1 :FVC ratio less than the lower limit of normal, LLN) at ages 8, 12 (PIAMA only) or 16 years was classified as classic (FEV1 1 ≥LLN) obstruction. Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between these two types of obstruction and respiratory health outcomes were estimated by cohort-adjusted logistic regression on pooled data., Results: The prevalence of classic obstruction at ages 8, 12 and 16 in the two cohorts was 1.5%, 1.1% and 1.5%, respectively. Dysanaptic obstruction was slightly more prevalent: 3.9%, 2.5% and 4.6%, respectively. Obstruction, regardless of FEV 1 , was consistently associated with higher odds of asthma (dysanaptic obstruction: OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.40 to 3.74), wheezing, asthma medication use and BHR compared with the normal lung function group. Approximately one-third of the subjects with dysanaptic obstruction in childhood remained dysanaptic during adolescence., Clinical Implications: Children and adolescents with airway obstruction had, regardless of their FEV1 level, a higher prevalence of asthma and wheezing. Follow-up and treatment at these ages should be guided by the presence of airway obstruction., Competing Interests: Competing interests: GHK reports grant support from the Netherlands Lung Foundation, TEVA the Netherlands, GSK, Vertex, Ubbo Emmius Foundation, European Union (H2020) and ZonMW outside the submitted work. GHK reports lecture and/or advisory fees from GSK, AstraZeneca and PureIMS (money to institution). EM reports lecture and/or advisory board fees from ALK, Airsonett, AstraZeneca, Chiesi, Novartis and Sanofi outside the submitted work. GW reports lecture fees from Sanofi outside the submitted work., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF