Search

Parenting a child with neurodevelopmental disorder (NDD) is related to a higher rate of anxiety and depression, increased stress, and reduced quality of life. Although there is reason to believe that parenting children with NDD in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) can be challenging, there is a lack of knowledge on the psychological distress among these caregivers, especially in rural areas. The aim of the study was to examine the psychological distress among caregivers having children with NDD in rural Nepal. Sixty-three caregivers were visited in their homes and interviewed by experienced mental health professionals. This study examined demographic information, severity of disability, perceived caregiver burden, and psychological distress, measured by the General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12). The study found a high level of psychological distress in the caregivers ( M = 5.38, SD = 2.8). A majority (90.5%) scored two or higher, indicating the presence of a common mental disorder (CMD). Almost half (46%) scored six or higher, indicating a high level of distress. A majority of the caregivers reported that caring for their disabled child had a negative effect on the caregiver's economy (70%), physical health (65%), social life (64%), and dreams and expectations for the future (81%). There was a significant relationship between the caregiver's psychological distress (GHQ-12) and degree of disability in the child (Gross Motor Function Classification System), degree of caregiver burden, feeding problems, having health workers as a possible source of help, receiving incentive from the government, having somebody to confide in, and caregiver illiteracy. A forward regression analysis entering the significant factors indicated that caregiver burden, having someone to confide in, and having health workers as a possible source of help were significant related to psychological distress. The final step of the model explained 42.4% of the variance in psychological distress among the caregivers. The study indicates a high level of psychological distress and high overall burden in caregivers of children with NDD in rural Nepal. Further implications for research and service development are discussed.

Purpose: Most people with epilepsy live in low- or middle-income countries (LMICs) where there are relatively few doctors. Over 50% of people with epilepsy in these countries are untreated so other models of care are needed. In this report we evaluate a novel model of care., Methods: We trained four residents of Myagdi, a rural district in Nepal as epilepsy field workers (EFWs). They provided epilepsy awareness to their communities. When they identified someone with possible epilepsy they used a smartphone application (app) to determine the probability score for an episode being epileptic and contacted an epilepsy specialist by phone. If the specialist thought treatment was indicated this was arranged by the EFW. We recorded mortality, change of diagnosis at face-to-face consultation and drug-related events as measures of safety. Seizure frequency and general wellbeing were also recorded, and a questionnaire was devised to measure satisfaction., Results: 112 patients with app scores suggesting epileptic seizures were identified and managed in 18 months, of whom 15 had provoked seizures. Forty-three percent of epilepsy patients were untreated. At follow-up one had died of a cause other than epilepsy. Diagnostic agreement at face-to-face assessment was 93%. Overall 5% had side-effects of medication. Seizures were stopped in 33% and reduced in 57%. Ninety-six percent of patients preferred this service to travelling to other doctors., Conclusion: This novel service met all criteria of safety and was effective in reducing frequency of seizures. Patients preferred it to conventional services. It should be transferable to other LMICs., (Copyright © 2018 British Epilepsy Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The Hospital and Rehabilitation Centre for Disabled Children (HRDC) in Nepal identified the need to evaluate their in-hospital and community programmes. An instrument was developed to provide information regarding the functional level of the children treated by the HRDC as well as to provide information regarding care-givers' attitudes towards disability. Inter-rater reliability of the measure was tested in three regions of Nepal with 49 children. Six HRDC field workers travelled in pairs to the childrens' homes and alternated in roles as test administrator and observer. Correlations between the scores documented by the administrator and observer were used to estimate inter-rater reliability. Inter-rater reliability coefficients, calculated using a weighted kappa statistic, varied from 0.60 to 1.0. We conclude that the instrument demonstrated an acceptable level of inter-rater reliability in the field setting. Future studies to measure construct and concurrent validity, test-retest reliability and responsiveness of the instrument are recommended as well as testing the instrument in different cultures.