Search

To determine the effects of location and season on growth of bulls, Hereford bulls from Montana (MH; n = 15) and Nebraska (NH; n = 15) and Brahman bulls from Texas and Louisiana (BB; n = 18) were moved to three locations: Montana (MT), Nebraska (NE) or Texas (TX). Each location received 5 NH, 5 MH and 6 BB. Control bulls (not relocated) were maintained at each location. All bulls were pubertal at the time of relocation in May 1984. At 28-d intervals, body weight, hip height, testis length and scrotal circumference were recorded for each bull for 22 mo after relocation. Paired testes volume (PTV) was calculated. Among Hereford bulls, body weights were similar (P greater than .10) in all control and relocated bulls by the end of the study, except that MH bulls moved to TX had lower body weights (P less than .01). Brahman bulls moved to northern locations had dramatically reduced body weights, compared to control Brahmans kept in TX; body weight of Brahman bulls in MT remained lower (P less than .01) at the end of the study. Brahman bulls in NE and MT had smaller scrotal circumference and PTV (P less than .01) than did control Brahmans in TX during the 1st yr after relocation. Relocated BB exhibited marked seasonal fluctuations in testis size, with increases during the summer and decreases during the winter (P less than .01); seasonal changes were not apparent in control Brahmans in TX. These results indicate that moving Brahman bulls to northern environments reduced body weight gain and caused dramatic seasonal changes in testis size; these effects were more pronounced in Brahman bulls moved to the most northern location.

Hereford bulls from Montana (MH; n = 15) and Nebraska (NH; n = 15) and Brahman bulls from Texas (BB; n = 18) were relocated to one of three locations (LOC): Montana (MT), Nebraska (NE) or Texas (TX). All bulls were pubertal at the time of relocation in late May 1984. Semen was collected by electroejaculation within 1 wk after relocation and at 90-d intervals beginning in November 1984 through early February 1986. Bulls were given a GnRH challenge (200 micrograms i.m.) during the same week of semen collections. Bulls also were bled for 8 h at 20-min intervals in the fall of 1984 and the spring and fall of 1985 to determine endogenous concentrations of LH and testosterone. Season affected sperm concentration in all breeds (P less than .05) with decreases during the winter in BB and during the summer in NH and MH bulls. Brahman bulls had lower percentage of live cells (LIVE) than NH and MH bulls did (P less than .0001). Brahman bulls decreased in LIVE during the winter (P less than .001). Area under the LH curve after GnRH was lower (P less than .005) in BB than in MH and NH. Brahman bulls in MT had greater (P less than .02) area under the LH curve and lower (P less than .06) area under the testosterone curve than did BB in TX or NE during the winter. There was no seasonal fluctuation in LH or testosterone response to GnRH in NH or MH bulls at any LOC. Area under the endogenous LH curve was lowest (P less than .04) in BB. Basal endogenous testosterone concentration was greater (P less than .03) in NH than in MH or BB. Area under the endogenous testosterone curve was lower (P less than .03) in MH than in NH or BB. These results indicate that BB exhibit seasonal fluctuations in semen quality. This was not so apparent in semen quality traits of Hereford bulls. There also was a seasonal influence in BB on both endogenous testosterone and GnRH-stimulated LH and testosterone concentrations. Compared with Hereford bulls, Brahman bulls had lower endogenous and GnRH-stimulated concentrations of LH.