Search

Background/aims: In 1996, Nebraska became the first state in the United States to establish a Parkinson's disease (PD) Registry. The objectives of this study were to determine the most common comorbid conditions among PD patients receiving inpatient and outpatient services in Nebraska between 2004 and 2012, and to examine whether PD patients had increased risks of these conditions., Methods: Statewide linkage was performed between Nebraska PD Registry data and hospital discharge database. The cohort comprised of 3,852 PD inpatients and 19,260 non-PD inpatients, and 5,217 PD outpatients and 26,085 non-PD outpatients. Referent subjects were matched to PD patients by age at initial hospital admissions or visits, gender, and county of residence using systematic random-sampling method., Results: Compared to non-PD inpatients, PD inpatients were at higher risks for dementia (relative risk [RR] 2.29; 95% CI 2.14-2.45), mood disorders (RR 1.57; 95% CI 1.44-1.70), gastrointestinal disorders (RR 1.15; 95% CI 1.06-1.25), and urinary tract infections (RR 1.33; 95% CI 1.22-1.45), while PD outpatients had higher risks for spondylosis (RR 1.23; 95% CI 1.09-1.38), genitourinary disorders (RR 1.48; 95% CI 1.29-1.69), gastrointestinal disorders (RR 1.59; 95% CI 1.38-1.84), and dementia (RR 2.83; 95% CI 2.38-3.37) than non-PD outpatients., Conclusions: The findings highlight PD as a multisystem neurodegenerative disorder, and this information is crucial for creating strategies to better prevent and manage PD complications., (© 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

We examined a sample of individuals in the Nebraska State Parkinson's Disease Registry (NSPDR) to determine what proportion meets standard criteria for Parkinson's disease (PD). The NSPDR was established in 1996 in an effort to understand the high prevalence of PD in Nebraska. Only minimal demographic data are included for each entrant. Subjects enter the NSPDR by means of diagnosing physicians, pharmacists dispensing anti-PD medications and the patients themselves. A series of 356 registrants diagnosed between 1997 and 2001 were contacted and invited to participate in a case-control study. Medical records were reviewed by a single abstractor in a standard manner. When patients consented, history was filled in by interview. A subset of patients were examined by a movement disorders specialist, who assigned all patients a probability of PD. Where sufficient information was available, 78% of registrants were confirmed to have PD (i.e., percent probability > 50%), including 83% of the patients previously diagnosed by a neurologist. Tremor was an initial symptom in 72% of confirmed versus 39% of excluded cases, and resting tremor was present in 86% of those that were confirmed. The most frequent reasons for exclusion were drug-induced Parkinsonism, multiple systems atrophy, vascular disease, and essential tremor. Use of the NSPDR for epidemiologic study requires careful review of the data set before assignment of cases. When histories are compiled in a standardized, comprehensive manner, the necessity for actual patient examinations can be minimized.

Background and Objective: In preparation for analytic study we undertook to describe areas of relative excess and deficit of Parkinson's Disease (PD) in Nebraska and tested two methodologic tools for inexpensive assessment of descriptive epidemiology of PD., Methods: In lieu of large-scale population screening and diagnosis, we obtained sales information of anti-PD drugs in the state in 1988-1990 as well as listings of all people dying from 1984 to 1993 who had Parkinson's Disease mentioned anywhere on their death certificate. The anti-PD drug sales data are intended as a proxy for prevalence, while the death certificate data are intended as a proxy for incidence., Results: Sales divided by population over age 54 indicates where anti-PD drug sales differ from expected. We found high correlation of drug sales rates with several farming exposures. Age-adjusted death rates, however, showed a low degree of association with sales or farming variables. This may be attributable to differences in death certificate completion or in underlying incidence versus prevalence., Conclusions: These techniques provide a useful tool for delineating possible differences in incidence and prevalence. While not as accurate as full community survey with expert diagnosis, they are not as expensive, and can be followed by local cluster investigations and individual-level etiologic studies to test hypotheses resulting from the initial study.