Search

The aim of our study was to compare strain elastography (SE), acoustic radiation force impulse-inducing Virtual Touch Imaging ([VTI] Siemens Medical Solutions, Mountain View, CA, USA), Virtual Touch Imaging Quantification ([VTIQ] Siemens Medical Solutions) and combined methods in the evaluation of ultrasound (US) Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4 lesions to explore an applicable way to reduce unnecessary biopsy by reducing false positives of conventional US without yielding false-negative cases. A total of 267 patients with 278 BI-RADS category 4 lesions (151 benign and 127 malignant) were evaluated with conventional B-mode US, SE, VTI and VTIQ implemented on a Siemens Acuson S2000 US system. Diagnostic performance, including area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were evaluated. Overall, VTI alone exhibited the highest NPV (91.74%), although combined elastic methods exhibited higher NPV than single methods, with the highest NPV at 100% when the VTI, SE and VTIQ methods were combined. Compared with conventional US, PPV increased from 45.7% (127 of 278) to 63.18% (127 of 201) when adding combined elastography (VTI + SE +VTIQ). In addition, 52.5% (63/120) and 50.8% (61/120) of BI-RADS 4 A lesions were downgraded when using combined methods (VTI + SE and VTI + SE + VTIQ, respectively) without missing any cancer. However, 2 intraductal papillomas and 1 phyllodes tumor were not identified. In conclusion, the combination of different elastic methods have the potential to downgrade BI-RADS 4A lesions to reduce false-positive biopsies without increasing the risk of missing cancers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]