Search

• AI outperformed radiologists when looking at negative-misclassifications. • AI could reduce radiologist's workload by up to 86.7%. • AI could improve the standardization and implementation of lung cancer screening. To evaluate performance of AI as a standalone reader in ultra-low-dose CT lung cancer baseline screening, and compare it to that of experienced radiologists. 283 participants who underwent a baseline ultra-LDCT scan in Moscow Lung Cancer Screening, between February 2017–2018, and had at least one solid lung nodule, were included. Volumetric nodule measurements were performed by five experienced blinded radiologists, and independently assessed using an AI lung cancer screening prototype (AVIEW LCS, v1.0.34, Coreline Soft, Co. ltd, Seoul, Korea) to automatically detect, measure, and classify solid nodules. Discrepancies were stratified into two groups: positive-misclassification (PM); nodule classified by the reader as a NELSON-plus /EUPS-indeterminate/positive nodule, which at the reference consensus read was < 100 mm3, and negative-misclassification (NM); nodule classified as a NELSON-plus /EUPS-negative nodule, which at consensus read was ≥ 100 mm3. 1149 nodules with a solid-component were detected, of which 878 were classified as solid nodules. For the largest solid nodule per participant (n = 283); 61 [21.6 %; 53 PM, 8 NM] discrepancies were reported for AI as a standalone reader, compared to 43 [15.1 %; 22 PM, 21 NM], 36 [12.7 %; 25 PM, 11 NM], 29 [10.2 %; 25 PM, 4 NM], 28 [9.9 %; 6 PM, 22 NM], and 50 [17.7 %; 15 PM, 35 NM] discrepancies for readers 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 respectively. Our results suggest that through the use of AI as an impartial reader in baseline lung cancer screening, negative-misclassification results could exceed that of four out of five experienced radiologists, and radiologists' workload could be drastically diminished by up to 86.7%. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]