Search

Background: "Resect and discard" (RD) is a new paradigm for management of diminutive polyps., Aim: To compare concordance of surveillance interval recommendations and diagnostic performance between RD and standard of care in a hospital outpatient department with both academic and community gastroenterologists., Methods: Prospective, observational study conducted at a single outpatient endoscopy center over 12 months. Patients with diminutive polyps on screening or surveillance colonoscopy were included. Histology predictions for all diminutive polyps (≤5 mm) were made based on endoscopic imaging. Concordance of recommended surveillance intervals and diagnostic performance of histology predictions were compared to histopathological review., Results: A total of 606 diminutive polyps were found in 315 patients (mean age 62.4 years, 49 % female). Histological prediction was made in 95.7 % of polyps (97.4 % of patients), with high confidence in 74.3 %. The concordance for surveillance intervals was 82.1 % compared to histopathological review and was similar between community and academic gastroenterologists (80.2 vs. 76.3 %, p = 0.38). Overall, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of histological predictions made with high confidence were 0.81, 0.36, and 77.1 %. Predictions made with narrow-band imaging (NBI) had lower accuracy (73.9 % with NBI vs. 82.5 % with high-definition white light (HWDL) only, p = 0.017) as well as lower prediction confidence (score of 7.6 with NBI vs. 8.6 with HDWL only, p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Our surveillance interval concordance was below the 90 % threshold deemed acceptable by the ASGE Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations statement. Diagnostic performance using optical imaging to predict histology was equal between community and academic endoscopists.

Objectives: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are used to clear main pancreatic duct (MPD) stones and alleviate pain in patients with chronic pancreatitis. The goal of this study was to determine if delayed ERCP after disintegration of MPD stones with ESWL improves the successful clearance of the MPD., Methods: Adult patients with chronic pancreatitis who underwent ESWL for stone disintegration were identified from an ESWL database at a single tertiary referral center. The complete clearance of stones from the MPD with ERCP performed less than 2 days after ESWL was compared to complete clearance from ERCP more than 2 days after ESWL., Results: Nineteen patients underwent ERCP less than 2 days after ESWL, and 3 (16%) of the 19 achieved MPD clearance. Eleven patients underwent ERCP more than 2 days after ESWL, and 9 (82%) of 11 patients achieved MPD clearance (P = 0.001). In total, 19 of 30 ERCPs were performed less than 2 days after ESWL, and 84% failed to clear the MPD (P = 0.001)., Conclusions: The timing of ERCP after ESWL may be important to successfully clear stones from the MPD. This study shows that ERCP performed less than 2 days after ESWL may be more likely to fail, possibly owing to ESWL-induced edema. Delaying ERCP after ESWL may allow tissue recovery after ESWL.