1. Esophagomyotomy versus forceful dilation for achalasia of the esophagus: results in 899 patients.
- Author
-
Okike N, Payne WS, Neufeld DM, Bernatz PE, Pairolero PC, and Sanderson DR
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Child, Preschool, Esophageal Achalasia surgery, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hernia, Hiatal complications, Hernia, Hiatal surgery, Humans, Hydrostatic Pressure, Male, Middle Aged, Minnesota, Palliative Care, Postoperative Complications, Risk, Dilatation adverse effects, Dilatation methods, Esophageal Achalasia therapy, Esophagus surgery
- Abstract
Between 1949 and 1976, 899 patients underwent treatment for achalasia of the esophagus at the Mayo Clinic, 431 by forceful hydrostatic or pneumatic dilation and 468 by a standardized transthoracic esophagomyotomy. Esophageal leak and mediastinal sepsis was an uncommon but major complication of both types of therapy, occurring four times more often with dilation (4%) than with myotomy (1%), although no deaths resulted from this in either group. The 30-day mortality was 0.2% after myotomy and 0.5% after forceful dilation. Although there was minimal morbidity and mortality with either modality, the late results were significantly superior after myotomy. Excellent to good results were obtained by 85% of the group treated with myotomy but only by 65% of those treated with hydrostatic dilation. Late poor results were encountered three times more frequently after dilation (19%) than after myotomy (6%). Analysis of poor results after myotomy indicates that late serious complications of gastroesophageal reflux developed in only 3% of patients operated on.
- Published
- 1979
- Full Text
- View/download PDF