Search

Unlabelled: In 1997 the U.S. government funded the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), but the 48 billion dollars initiative has had limited success in finding and enrolling uninsured children. While such children are more likely to receive care in emergency departments (EDs), no national initiative has targeted EDs for child health insurance outreach., Objective: As a pilot study for a national multicenter study, this study evaluated the effectiveness of child health insurance outreach in an ED setting., Methods: This was a prospective observational study of the outreach efforts of a single case manager from August 1998 to July 1999, performed at Foote Hospital ED in Jackson, Michigan (45,000 visits/year). All patients

Purpose: To understand the responses of medical students and educators to high-fidelity patient simulation, a new technology allowing "practice without risk.", Method: Pilot groups of students (n = 27) and educators (n = 33) were exposed to a simulator session, then surveyed with multiple-choice and open-ended questions. Open-ended comments were transcribed and coded. They were analyzed for recurring themes and tested for inter-rater agreement. An independent focus group subsequently performed higher-level thematic analysis., Results: Overall, 85% of the students rated the session excellent and 85% of the educators rated it excellent or very good. Over 80% of both groups thought that simulator-based training should be required for all medical students. Analytic categories derived from written comments were: Overall Assessment (i.e., "generally good experience"); Process Descriptors (i.e., "very realistic"); Teaching Utility (i.e., "broad educational tool"); Pedagogic Efficacy (i.e., "promotes critical thinking"); and Goals for Future Use (i.e., "more practice sessions"). Thirty percent of students and 38% of educators were impressed by the realism of the simulator, and they (37% and 25%, respectively) identified the ability to "practice" medicine as the primary advantage of simulation. The focus group rated cost as the major current disadvantage (66%)., Conclusions: Students' and educators' responses to high-fidelity patient simulation were very positive. The ability to practice without risk must be weighed against the cost of this new technology.