Search

Study Objective. To assess the effect of daptomycin compared with vancomycin on the clinical and economic outcomes in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections. Design. Prospective, open-label study. Setting. Level 1 trauma center in Detroit, Michigan. Patients. Fifty-three adult patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections at risk for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection who were treated with daptomycin and a matched cohort of 212 patients treated with vancomycin. Intervention. Patients in the prospective arm received intravenous daptomycin 4 mg/kg every 24 hours for at least 3 days but not more than 14 days. Historical controls received at least 3 days of vancomycin dosed to achieve trough concentrations of 5-20 µg/ml. Measurements and Main Results. Outcomes evaluated included blinded assessments of clinical resolution, duration of therapy, and costs. The most common diagnoses were cellulitis (31%), abscess (22%), and both cellulitis with abscess (37%). Microbiology differed significantly between groups, with S. aureus found in 27 patients (51%) in the daptomycin group and 167 patients (79%) in the vancomycin group and MRSA in 22 (42%) and 159 (75%), respectively (p<0.001). The proportions of patients with clinical improvement or resolution of their infections on days 3 and 5 were 90% versus 70% and 98% versus 81% in the daptomycin versus vancomycin groups, respectively (p<0.01 for both comparisons), and 100% at the end of therapy in both groups. Among patients with complete resolution of their infections (41 patients [77%] with daptomycin vs 89 patients [42%] with vancomycin, p<0.05), median duration of intravenous therapy was 4 and 7 days, respectively, (p<0.001), and hospital costs were $5027 and $7552 (p<0.001). Conclusions. Patients receiving daptomycin achieved more rapid resolution of symptoms and clinical cure and had a decreased duration of inpatient therapy compared with those receiving vancomycin. This study suggests that daptomycin is a cost-effective alternative to vancomycin for complicated skin and skin structure infections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Daptomycin (Dap) has become increasingly important to combat infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus (SA). However, reports of daptomycin nonsusceptible (DNS) SA strains have emerged over the recent years, specifically with alteration of the MprF gene. Mutations in this gene lead to an increase in lysyl-phosphatidyl glycerol production resulting in a lower susceptibility to Dap and cationic antimicrobial peptides. Point mutations in the cls2 gene have also been associated with DNS SA through similar mechanisms of action. This study describes the gene mutations involved in our patients with SA bloodstream infections (BSIs) that developed Dap resistance. Methods This is a retrospective study in a tertiary healthcare system in southeast Michigan. SA blood isolates were sequenced through a gene-by-gene approach using Ridom SeqSphere. Charts were reviewed for clinical and laboratory data. Dap minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined by E-test. DNS was defined as an MIC > 1.0 µg/mL. Results From December 3, 2015 to May 8, 2017, 7 patients were identified with DNS SA BSI. Mean age of the patients was 59 (SD = 13.7) and 86% were male. Mean bacteremia duration was 7 days (SD = 6.3), mean hospital length of stay was 13 days (SD = 9.8), 5 isolates were methicillin-resistant SA, and 2 were methicillin-sensitive SA. When comparing molecular sequencing of all seven patients with their Dap-sensitive strains vs. resistant strains, all patients, except for patient 3, had a point mutation at different allele loci in the MprF gene (Table 1). Additionally, two patients had point mutations in the cls2 gene. When comparing all 27 strains from the seven patients, each cluster was attributed to an individual patient with the exception of cluster one that included patients 5 and 6 suggesting transmission (Figure 1). Conclusion DNS SA is infrequent; however, the present study shows that it can emerge both from methicillin-resistant and -susceptible SA most commonly when developing MprF and cls2 gene mutations as seen in our patients. Patient 3 was the exception in our analysis and likely developed DNS SA through another gene mutation. Further studies are necessary to know the frequency of each mutation with all genes associated with DNS SA, and epidemiological risk factors of transmission. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) is a leading cause of hospital-acquired infection, with limited treatment options. Resistance to one of the few remaining drugs, daptomycin, is a growing clinical problem and has previously been described in this hospital. In response to increasing resistance, an antimicrobial stewardship intervention was implemented to reduce hospital-wide use of daptomycin. To assess the impact of the intervention, daptomycin prescribing patterns and clinically reported culture results from vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREfm) bloodstream infections (BSIs) from 2011 through 2017 were retrospectively extracted and the impact of the intervention was estimated using interrupted time series analysis (ITS). We corrected for a change in MIC determination methodology by retesting 262 isolates using Etest and broth microdilution. Hospital-wide and within-patient resistance patterns of corrected daptomycin MICs are reported. Our data show that daptomycin prescriptions decreased from an average of 287 days of therapy/month preintervention to 151 days of therapy/month postintervention. Concurrently, the proportion of patients experiencing an increase in daptomycin MIC during an infection declined from 14.6% (7/48 patients) in 2014 to 1.9% (1/54 patients) in 2017. Hospital-wide resistance to daptomycin also decreased in the postintervention period, but this was not maintained. This study shows that an antimicrobial stewardship-guided intervention reduced daptomycin use and improved individual level outcomes but had only transient impact on the hospital-level trend., (Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology.)