Search

Sanicip Bio Control (SBC) is a novel product developed in Mexico for biofilms' removal. The aims of this study were to evaluate (i) the removal of mixed-species biofilms by enzymatic (protease and α-amylase, 180 MWU/g) and chemical treatments (30 mL/L SBC, and 200 mg/L peracetic acid, PAA) and (ii) their effectiveness against planktonic cells. Mixed-species biofilms were developed on stainless steel (SS) and polypropylene B (PP) in whole milk (WM), tryptic soy broth (TSB) with meat extract (TSB+ME), and TSB with chicken egg yolk (TSB+EY) to simulate the food processing environment. On SS, all biofilms were removed after treatments, except the enzymatic treatment that only reduced 1–2 log10 CFU/cm2, whereas on PP, the reductions ranged between 0.59 and 5.21 log10 CFU/cm2, being the biofilms developed in TSB+EY being resistant to the cleaning and disinfecting process. Higher reductions in microbial load on PP were reached using enzymes, SBC, and PAA. The employed planktonic cells were markedly more sensitive to PAA and SBC than were the sessile cells. In conclusion, biofilm removal from SS can be achieved with SBC, enzymes, or PAA. It is important to note that the biofilm removal was strongly affected by the food contact surfaces (FCSs) and surrounding media. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Imported papayas from Mexico have been implicated in multiple salmonellosis outbreaks in the United States in recent years. While postharvest washing is a critical process to remove latex, dirt, and microbes, it also has the potential of causing cross-contamination by foodborne pathogens, with sponge or other fibrous rubbing tools often questioned as potential harboring or transmitting risk. In this study, Salmonella inactivation and cross-contamination via sponges and microfiber wash mitts during simulated papaya washing and cleaning were investigated. Seven washing treatments (wash without sanitizer; wash at free chlorine 25, 50, and 100 mg/L, and at peracetic acid 20, 40, and 80 mg/L), along with unwashed control, were evaluated, using Salmonella strains with unique antibiotic markers differentially inoculated on papaya rind (serovars Typhimurium, Heidelberg, and Derby) and on wash sponge or microfiber (serovars Typhimurium, Newport, and Braenderup). Salmonella survival and transfer on papaya and on sponge/microfiber, and in wash water were detected using selective plating or enrichment. The washing and cleaning process reduced Salmonella on inoculated papayas by 1.69–2.66 and 0.69–1.74 log for sponge and microfiber cleaning, respectively, with the reduction poorly correlated to sanitizer concentration. Salmonella on inoculated sponge or microfiber was under detection limit (1.00 log CFU/cm2) by plate count, but remained recoverable by selective enrichment. Transference of Salmonella from inoculated papaya to sponge/microfiber, and vice versa , could be detected sporadically by selective enrichment. Sponge/microfiber mediated Salmonella cross-contamination from inoculated to uninoculated papayas was frequently detectable by selective enrichment, but rendered undetectable by wetting sponge/microfiber in sanitizing wash water (FC 25–100 mg/L or PAA 20–80 mg/L) between washing different papaya fruits. Therefore, maintaining adequate sanitizer levels and frequently wetting sponge/microfiber in sanitizing wash water can effectively mitigate risks of Salmonella cross-contamination associated with postharvest washing, especially with regard to the use of sponge or microfiber wash mitts. • Salmonella inactivation and cross-contamination during papaya washing were evaluated. • Papaya washing at 25, 50, and 100 mg/L FC, and 20, 40, and 80 mg/L PAA was tested. • Washing with above sanitizers reduced Salmonella on papayas (0.69–2.66 log) and sponge/microfiber (>5 log). • Sponge/microfiber mediated cross-contamination was detectable by selective enrichment. • Cross-contamination was reduced to undetectable with wetting sponge/microfiber in sanitizing wash water between wiping papayas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]