Search

Purpose: To describe the primary barriers to adequately adhering to a structured nutritional intervention., Patients and Methods: A total of 106 participants diagnosed with dyslipidemia and without a medical nutrition therapeutic plan were included in this two-year study conducted at the INCMNSZ dyslipidemia clinic in Mexico City. All patients were treated with the same structured strategies, including three face-to-face visits and two telephone follow-up visits. Diet plan adherence was evaluated at each site visit through a 3-day or 24-h food recall., Results: Barriers to adhere to the nutritional intervention were: lack of time to prepare their meals (23%), eating outside the home (19%), unwillingness to change dietary patterns (14%), and lack of information about a correct diet for dyslipidemias (14%). All barriers decreased significantly at the end of the intervention. Female gender, current smoking, and following a plan of more than 1500 kcal (R 2 = 0.18 and p -value = 0.004) were associated with good diet adherence. Participants showed good levels of adherence to total caloric intake at visit 2 and 3, reporting 104.7% and 95.4%, respectively. Adherence to macronutrient intake varied from 65.1% to 126%, with difficulties in adhering to recommended carbohydrate and fat consumption being more notable., Conclusion: The study findings confirm that a structured nutritional intervention is effective in reducing barriers and improving dietary adherence and metabolic control in patients with dyslipidemias. Health providers must identify barriers to adherence early on to design interventions that reduce these barriers and improve adherence.

Objectives: To examine the factors associated with satisfaction with healthcare services provided to patients with diabetes, hypertension, and/or dyslipidemia in the Mexican population., Methods: In a cross-sectional, retrospective study, we used data from the 2016 Half-Way National Health and Nutrition Survey in Mexico (ENSANUT MC 2016). This contained self-reported information about patient satisfaction and use of healthcare services by 2529 adults. An ordinal regression model was performed to identify predictors of overall patient satisfaction., Results: Good or very good satisfaction was reported by 85.2% of the respondents. Patient satisfaction was positively associated with the quality of medical care (very good, odds ratio [OR] = 29.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 9.04-97.62; good, OR = 13.24, 95% CI 5.07-34.57; and regular, OR = 6.56, 95% CI 2.49-17.30) and having been attended by a medical specialist (OR = 2.42, 95% CI 1.01-5.83). Patient satisfaction was negatively associated with a worse perception of health status (OR = 0.07, 95% CI 0.02-0.25), no change in health status (OR = 0.377, 95% CI 0.15-0.98), time in the waiting room (OR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.99-1.01), and poor conditions of the health center (OR = 0.09, 95% CI 0.04-0.18)., Conclusion: There are several elements of organization, structure, and delivery of healthcare that are associated with patient satisfaction, although our findings need to be confirmed using longitudinal designs. Governments could use these findings to strengthen actions for improving patient satisfaction., (Copyright © 2019 ISPOR--The professional society for health economics and outcomes research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)