Search

The article discusses a study which compared the outcomes of gastric banding and lifestyle intervention programs on adolescent obesity. The study included 50 adolescents from Melbourne, Victoria, who are aged 14 to 18 and with a body mass index (BMI) that is higher than 35. It found that study subjects in the gastric banding group experienced no adverse events and reported quality of life improvements. Study authors concluded that gastric banding results in greater weight loss compared to lifestyle intervention. They also noted the health and quality of life benefits of gastric banding.

Abstract Background Standard non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) reduce the risk of colorectal cancer; however, their use as preventive agents is limited by their inherent toxicity. Drugs that selectively inhibit cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) may be useful in this setting as they are supposedly less toxic. No study has directly compared the ability of standard NSAIDs and selective COX-2 inhibitors to inhibit colorectal cancer at clinically relevant doses. Methods Aberrant crypt foci (ACF) were induced in Sprague–Dawley rats by using 1,2-dimethylhydrazine (DMH). Test agents or vehicle were then administered for 3 weeks, twice daily through orogastric gavage. At the end of this period, the number and multiplicity of ACF were determined. The agents tested at equivalent anti-inflammatory doses were: sulindac and indomethacin (standard NSAIDs), meloxicam (selective COX-2 inhibitor), celecoxib (specific COX-2 inhibitor) and sulindac sulfone (no known COX activity). Acute gastrotoxicity of NSAID in rats was compared by using quantitative histology. Results All test agents reduced the number of ACF. There was a 42% reduction with indomethacin, 46% with sulindac, 46% with meloxicam, 22% with celecoxib and 36% with sulindac sulfone. Only the COX-2 inhibitors caused no significant gastrotoxicity in rats. Conclusions Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors are potentially ideal chemopreventive agents as they inhibit ACF and are not gastrotoxic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Standard non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) reduce the risk of colorectal cancer; however, their use as preventive agents is limited by their inherent toxicity. Drugs that selectively inhibit cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) may be useful in this setting as they are supposedly less toxic. No study has directly compared the ability of standard NSAIDs and selective COX-2 inhibitors to inhibit colorectal cancer at clinically relevant doses. Methods Aberrant crypt foci (ACF) were induced in Sprague–Dawley rats by using 1,2-dimethylhydrazine (DMH). Test agents or vehicle were then administered for 3 weeks, twice daily through orogastric gavage. At the end of this period, the number and multiplicity of ACF were determined. The agents tested at equivalent anti-inflammatory doses were: sulindac and indomethacin (standard NSAIDs), meloxicam (selective COX-2 inhibitor), celecoxib (specific COX-2 inhibitor) and sulindac sulfone (no known COX activity). Acute gastrotoxicity of NSAID in rats was compared by using quantitative histology. Results All test agents reduced the number of ACF. There was a 42% reduction with indomethacin, 46% with sulindac, 46% with meloxicam, 22% with celecoxib and 36% with sulindac sulfone. Only the COX-2 inhibitors caused no significant gastrotoxicity in rats. Conclusions Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors are potentially ideal chemopreventive agents as they inhibit ACF and are not gastrotoxic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]