Search

Objective: Our objective is to compare the results of the students of the rising classes with the oral jury and those of the finalists to the central jury of the private and public MFIs of the city of Mbuji-Mayi. Methodology: In order to collect the data on the ground, we used the document analysis technique. The checklist was the measuring instrument used to record the data relating to our research. To carry out the study, we collected our data retrospectively. We traveled in different directions of the GTI under study in order to take the scores obtained by the students. We also consulted the charts submitted by these schools to the provincial MGI/EMI coordination office in order to verify the authentication of the results obtained in the schools. Results: A statistically significant difference in the scores of fourth-grade students in the two categories of GTI (Student's t = 6,034, p <0.001). While comparing mean scores in rising promotions, the differences observed are not statistically significant. Conclusion: We have come to the end of this work. The main objective was to compare the averages of the scores obtained by the students of the public sector GIS and those of the private sector. We found that the difference in pupil averages for pupils in these two categories was not significant for the rising classes, ie first, second and third A2. Whereas the difference between the averages of the finalist student scores (grade 4 A2) was significant. Public sector students performed better than their private sector counterparts, at 81% versus 19%. We have attributed the superiority of the averages of public sector students to the educational assets of public sector schools. In particular: well-equipped technical rooms, recruitment of qualified courses, respect for the program, teaching materials, discipline at school, compliance with the recruitment conditions defined by the 6th Directorate of Health Sciences Education. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]