Search

Background: In addition to severe hypoxia and hypercapnia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) can present with substantial hemodynamic compromise, requiring inotropic or vasopressor support or both. Either venovenous (VV) or venoarterial (VA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can be offered in this situation. However, a contemporary comparison of these two cannulation strategies has yet to be well described., Methods: The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry was reviewed for all cases of adult ARDS in patients that required inotropic agents or vasopressors or both before ECMO initiation (2009 to 2013). Pre-ECMO clinical data, ECMO variables, and outcomes were compared, based on initial cannulation strategy (VV or VA ECMO)., Results: Of 717 ECMO runs, there were 591 VV ECMO and 126 VA ECMO cases. Over the study period, the proportion of VA ECMO cases decreased from 20% (n = 37 of 184, 2009 to 2010) to 19% (n = 59 of 312, 2011 to 2012) to 14% (n = 30 of 221, 2013). Conversion from VV ECMO to VA ECMO was 4%. VV ECMO was associated with less gastrointestinal bleeding and hemolysis, but overall rates of bleeding, stroke, and renal failure were similar. Survival to discharge was 58% for VV ECMO in contrast to 43% for VA ECMO (p = 0.002). Multivariable regression analysis revealed VV ECMO to be an independent predictor of survival to discharge relative to VA ECMO., Conclusions: In this review of ARDS patients requiring pre-ECMO hemodynamic support, VV ECMO was not associated with worse survival or complication rates compared with VA ECMO. These data suggest that, in appropriately selected patients, it may be reasonable to initially institute VV ECMO support, reserving VA ECMO for conversion for refractory hypotension., (Copyright © 2017 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The incidence and consequences of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) have not been described recently in lung transplant recipients. We sought to characterize DVT and PE in a contemporary series of lung transplant recipients and describe their association with clinical outcomes., Methods: The records of all lung transplant recipients from July 1, 2008, to June 30, 2013, were reviewed and analyzed. DVT was diagnosed by venous duplex ultrasonography. PE was diagnosed by computed tomography angiography, nuclear ventilation/perfusion scanning, or pulmonary angiography., Results: The study comprised 117 patients who underwent 123 transplants. The median age was 63 years (range, 17 to 77 years). Forty-five patients (39%) had evidence of lower extremity DVT, 53 (45%) had no evidence of lower extremity DVT, and 19 (16%) were not tested. Fifty-three (45%) had evidence of upper extremity DVT, 30 (26%) had no evidence of upper extremity DVT, and 34 (29%) were not tested. Eighteen (15%) had evidence of PE, 82 (70%) had no evidence of PE, and 17 (15%) were not tested. A multivariable, stepwise Cox proportional hazards model revealed that the presence of lower extremity DVT (hazard ratio, 2.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.29 to 4.64), use of cardiopulmonary bypass (hazard ratio, 2.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.04 to 4.68), and unilateral lung transplantation (hazard ratio, 2.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.07 to 4.25) were associated with diminished survival., Conclusions: The incidence of DVT and PE in lung transplant recipients is high. Posttransplant surveillance and treatment based on findings are warranted., (Copyright © 2015 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)