Search

Background: Massive transfusion protocols (MTPs) are necessary for hemodynamically unstable trauma patients with active bleeding. Thrombotic events have been associated with blood transfusion; however, the risk factors for the development of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in trauma patients receiving MTP are unknown., Methods: A retrospective review was conducted by reviewing the electronic medical records of all trauma patients admitted to a Level I trauma center who received MTP from 2011 to 2016. Data were collected on patient demographics, mechanism of injury, injury severity scores, quantity of blood products transfused during MTP activation, incidence of VTE, intensive care unit length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, and ventilator days. The primary outcome was VTE., Results: Of the 59 patients who had MTP activated, 15 (25.4%) developed a VTE during their hospital admission. Patients who developed VTE were compared with those who did not. Age (40 y versus 35 y, P = 0.59), sex (60% versus 73% male, P = 0.52), and mechanism of injury (47% versus 59% blunt, P = 0.40) were similar. Intensive care unit LOS, hospital LOS, and ventilator days were longer in the patients who were diagnosed with a VTE. Multivariable analysis revealed an increase in the odds for developing a VTE with increasing packed red blood cell transfusion (adjusted odds ratio = 2.61, P = 0.03)., Conclusions: The risk for VTE in trauma patients requiring massive transfusion is proportional to the number of packed red blood cells transfused. Liberal screening protocols and maintenance of a high index of suspicion for VTE in these high-risk patients is justified., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Spinal motion restriction (SMR) after traumatic injury has been a mainstay of prehospital trauma care for more than 3 decades. Recent guidelines recommend a selective approach with cervical spine clearance in the field when criteria are met., Materials and Methods: In January 2014, the Department of Health Services of the City of Los Angeles, California, implemented revised guidelines for cervical SMR after blunt mechanism trauma. Adult patients (aged ≥18 y) with an initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of ≥13 presented to a single level I trauma center after blunt mechanism trauma over the following 1-y period were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, injury data, and prehospital data were collected. Cervical spine injury (CSI) was identified by International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, codes., Results: Emergency medical services transported 1111 patients to the emergency department who sustained blunt trauma. Patients were excluded if they refused c-collar placement or if documentation was incomplete. A total of 997 patients were included in our analysis with 172 (17.2%) who were selective cleared of SMR per protocol. The rate of Spinal Cord Injury was 2.2% (22/997) overall and 1.2% (2/172) in patients without SMR. The sensitivity and specificity of the protocol are 90.9% (95% confidence interval: 69.4-98.4) and 17.4% (95% confidence interval: 15.1-20.0), respectively, for CSI. Patients with CSI who arrived without immobilization having met field clearance guidelines, were managed without intervention, and had no neurologic compromise., Conclusions: Guidelines for cervical SMR have high sensitivity and low specificity to identify CSI. When patients with injuries were not placed on motion restrictions, there were no negative clinical outcomes., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)