1. Contextual barriers to infection prevention and control program implementation in hospitals in Latin America: a mixed methods evaluation.
- Author
-
Fabre V, Secaira C, Herzig C, Bancroft E, Bernachea MP, Galarza LA, Aquiles B, Arauz AB, Bangher MDC, Bernan ML, Burokas S, Canton A, Cazali IL, Colque A, Comas M, Contreras RV, Cornistein W, Cordoba MG, Correa SM, Campero GC, Chamorro Ayala MI, Chavez N, De Ascencao G, García CC, Esquivel C, Ezcurra C, Fabbro L, Falleroni L, Fernandez J, Ferrari S, Freire V, Garzón MI, Gonzales JA, Guaymas L, Guerrero-Toapanta F, Laplume D, Lambert S, Lemir CG, Lazarte PR, Lopez IL, Maldonado H, Martínez G, Maurizi DM, Mesplet F, Moreno Izquierdo C, Moya GL, Nájera M, Nuccetelli Y, Olmedo A, Palacio B, Pellice F, Raffo CL, Ramos C, Reino F, Rodriguez V, Romero F, Romero JJ, Sadino G, Sandoval N, Suarez M, Suayter MV, Ureña MA, Valle M, Vence Reyes L, Perez SVA, Videla H, Villamandos S, Villarreal O, Viteri MA, Warley E, and Quiros RE
- Subjects
- Humans, Latin America, Surveys and Questionnaires, Hospitals, Cross Infection prevention & control, Infection Control methods
- Abstract
Background: Infection prevention and control (IPC) programs are essential to prevent and control the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms in healthcare facilities (HCFs). The current implementation of these programs in Latin America remains largely unknown., Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods evaluation of IPC program implementation in HCFs from Guatemala, Panama, Ecuador, and Argentina, March-July 2022. We used the World Health Organization (WHO) IPC Assessment Framework (IPCAF) survey, a previously validated structured questionnaire with an associated scoring system that evaluates the eight core components of IPC (IPC program; IPC guidelines; IPC education and training; healthcare-associated infection [HAI] surveillance; multimodal strategies; monitoring and audit of IPC practices and feedback; workload, staffing, and bed occupancy; and the built environment and materials and equipment for IPC). Each section generates a score 0-100. According to the final score, the HCF IPC program implementation is categorized into four levels: inadequate (0-200), basic (201-400), intermediate (401-600), or advanced (601-800). Additionally, we conducted semi-structured interviews among IPC personnel and microbiologists using the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model to evaluate barriers and facilitators for IPC program implementation. We performed directed content analysis of interview transcripts to identify themes that focused on barriers and facilitators of IPC program implementation which are summarized descriptively., Results: Thirty-seven HCFs (15 for-profit and 22 non-profit) completed the IPCAF survey. The overall median score was 614 (IQR 569, 693) which corresponded to an "advanced" level of IPC implementation (32% [7/22] non-profit vs. 93% [14/15] for-profit HCFs in this category). The lowest scores were in workload, staffing and bed occupancy followed by IPC training and multimodal strategies. Forty individuals from 16 HCFs were interviewed. They perceived inadequate staffing and technical resources, limited leadership support, and cultural determinants as major barriers to effective IPC guideline implementation, while external accreditation and technical support from public health authorities were perceived as facilitators., Conclusions: Efforts to strengthen IPC activities in Latin American HCFs should focus on improving support from hospital leadership and public health authorities to ensure better resource allocation, promoting safety culture, and improving training in quality improvement., (© 2024. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF