1. Pipeline Embolization Device for Large/Giant or Fusiform Aneurysms: An Initial Multi-Center Experience in Korea.
- Author
-
Byung Moon Kim, Yong Sam Shin, Min Woo Baik, Deok Hee Lee, Pyoung Jeon, Seung Kug Baik, Tae Hong Lee, Dong-Hoon Kang, Sang-il Suh, Jun Soo Byun, Jin-Young Jung, Kihun Kwon, Dong Joon Kim, Keun Young Park, Bum-soo Kim, Jung Cheol Park, Seong Rim Kim, Young Woo Kim, Hoon Kim, and Kyungil Jo
- Subjects
- *
INTRACRANIAL aneurysms , *THERAPEUTIC embolization , *MEDICAL equipment , *INTERNAL carotid artery , *FOLLOW-up studies (Medicine) , *THERAPEUTICS - Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and early outcomes of the Pipeline device for large/giant or fusiform aneurysms. Materials and Methods: The Pipeline was implanted in a total of 45 patients (mean age, 58 years; M:F=10:35) with 47 large/giant or fusiform aneurysms. We retrospectively evaluated the characteristics of the treated aneurysms, the periprocedural events, morbidity and mortality, and the early outcomes after Pipeline implantation. Results: The aneurysms were located in the internal carotid artery (ICA) cavernous segment (n=25), ICA intradural segment (n=11), vertebrobasilar trunk (n=8), and middle cerebral artery (n=3). Procedure-related events occurred in 18 cases, consisting of incomplete expansion (n=8), shortening-migration (n=5), transient occlusion of a jailed branch (n=3), and in-stent thrombosis (n=2). Treatment-related morbidity occurred in two patients, but without mortality. Both patients had modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores of 2, but had an improved mRS score of 0 at 1-month follow-up. Of the 19 patients presenting with mass effect, 16 improved but three showed no changes in their presenting symptoms. All patients had excellent outcomes (mRS, 0 or 1) during the follow-up period (median, 6 months; range, 2-30 months). Vascular imaging follow-up (n=31, 65.9%; median, 3 months, range, 1-25 months) showed complete or near occlusion of the aneurysm in 24 patients (77.4%) and decreased sac size in seven patients (22.6%). Conclusion: In this initial multicenter study in Korea, the Pipeline seemed to be safe and effective for large/giant or fusiform aneurysms. However, a learning period may be required to alleviate devicerelated events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF