Search

Forty-one isolated large hominoid teeth, as well as most of the mandibular and three maxillary teeth associated with a partial skeleton, were recovered from middle Miocene Muruyur sediments near Kipsaramon in the Tugen Hills, Baringo District, Kenya. The isolated teeth were collected as surface finds and the skeleton was excavated in situ at locality BPRP#122 dated between 15·58 Ma and 15·36 Ma. The majority of the teeth recovered at BPRP#122 are referable to a minimum of five individuals of the hominoid Equatorius africanus. Three of the teeth, however, are provisionally assigned to Nyanzapithecus sp. The new hominoids from Kipsaramon add to an increasing inventory of specimens that suggest greater large hominoid taxonomic diversity from the middle Miocene of Kenya than was previously recognized. It is suggested that there are two large-bodied hominoid species present at Mabako, only one of which is assignable toEquatorius. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Understanding the biogeography and evolution of Miocene catarrhines relies on accurate specimen provenience. It has long been speculated that some catarrhine specimens among the early collections from Miocene sites in Kenya have incorrect provenience data. The provenience of one of these, the holotype of Equatorius africanus (NHM M16649), was previously revised based on x-ray fluorescence spectroscopy. Here we use nondestructive portable x-ray fluorescence spectroscopy to test the provenience of additional catarrhine specimens that, based on morphology and/or incomplete provenience information, were identified as possibly having been collected at a different site from that recorded at museum accession. We test the hypotheses that two specimens purportedly from the Early Miocene site of Rusinga (KNM-RU 1681 and KNM-RU 1999) are instead from Maboko, three specimens purportedly from the Middle Miocene site of Fort Ternan (KNM-FT 8, KNM-FT 41, and KNM-FT 3318) are instead from Songhor, and one specimen accessioned as being from Songhor (KNM-SO 5352) is from that site. Elemental data reveal that two of the specimens (KNM-FT 3318 and KNM-RU 1681) are likely to have been collected at sites other than their museum-accessioned provenience, while two others (KNM-RU 1999, and KNM-FT 41) were confirmed to have correct provenience. Results for both KNM-FT 8 and KNM-SO 5352, while somewhat equivocal, are best interpreted as supporting their accessioned provenience. Our results have implications for the distribution of certain catarrhine species during the Miocene in Kenya. Confirmation of the provenience of the specimens also facilitates taxonomic attribution, and resulted in additions to the morphological characterizations of some species. The protocol presented here has potential for wider application to assessing questions of provenience for fossils from other locations and periods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Describes a partial hominoid skeleton from a Middle Miocene site located west of Lake Baringo in central Kenya that seems to be an early member of the great ape-human clade. The two species of Kenyapithecus that are currently recognized; Description of this new genus; Etymology.

Kamoyapithecus hamiltoni is a potential early hominoid species described from fragmentary dentognathic specimens from the Oligocene site of Losodok (Turkana Basin, northwestern Kenya). Other catarrhine dental materials have been recovered at Losodok, but were not initially included in the Kamoyapithecus hypodigm. Here we present descriptions of the unpublished canine and incisor specimens from Losodok, and revisit the published specimens in light of recent changes in understanding of hominoid anterior dental evolution. The new fossils include a canine (KNM-LS 18354) that is morphologically compatible with being a female of Kamoyapithecus (KNM-LS 8). Randomization analyses of both Gorilla gorilla and middle Miocene Griphopithecus alpani demonstrate that the size difference between KNM-LS 8 and KNM-LS 18354 is also compatible with their being male and female canines of the same species. Significantly, a canine tip (KNM-LS 18352) attributed to Kamoyapithecus documents the distinctive burin tip morphology now recognized as characterizing Proconsul sensu stricto, which may indicate a close relationship between Kamoyapithecus and Proconsul. We also re-examined the enigmatic KNM-LS 1, a smaller lower canine assumed to derive from Losodok but for which historical provenience data are completely lacking. Elemental data derived from portable X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy show that KNM-LS 1 is almost certainly from Losodok rather than from nearby Miocene sites (i.e., Moruorot, Esha, Kalodirr). KNM-LS 1 displays a nyanzapithecine-like morphology and is shown by randomization analyses to be too small to be associated with the Kamoyapithecus canines. This demonstrates that there is a second hominoid taxon present at Losodok that records one of the earliest occurrences of the Nyanzapithecinae., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Forty-one isolated large hominoid teeth, as well as most of the mandibular and three maxillary teeth associated with a partial skeleton, were recovered from middle Miocene Muruyur sediments near Kipsaramon in the Tugen Hills, Baringo District, Kenya. The isolated teeth were collected as surface finds and the skeleton was excavated in situ at locality BPRP#122 dated between 15.58 Ma and 15.36 Ma. The majority of the teeth recovered at BPRP#122 are referable to a minimum of five individuals of the hominoid Equatorius africanus. Three of the teeth, however, are provisionally assigned to Nyanzapithecus sp. The new hominoids from Kipsaramon add to an increasing inventory of specimens that suggest greater large hominoid taxonomic diversity from the middle Miocene of Kenya than was previously recognized. It is suggested that there are two large-bodied hominoid species present at Mabako, only one of which is assignable to Equatorius., (Copyright 2002 Academic Press.)