Search

Men who have sex with men (MSM) in Kenya bear a heavy burden of HIV/STIs and are a priority population in the national HIV/AIDS response, yet remain criminalised and stigmatised within society. HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) offers an opportunity to significantly impact the HIV epidemic, as does the concept of U = U, whereby those who are living with HIV and on treatment are uninfectious when their viral load has been suppressed so as to be undetectable. However, the value of such innovations will not be realised without sufficient understanding of, and respect for, the sexual health service provision needs of MSM. This paper describes findings from 30 in-depth interviews with MSM living in Nairobi that explored engagement with sexual health service providers, barriers to access and perceived opportunities to improve service design and delivery. Findings indicate concern relating to the professionalism of some staff working within public hospitals as well as feelings that many sexual health services were not considered safe spaces for the discussion of MSM-specific sexual behaviour. Diverse views were expressed relating to comfort in public, community and private sexual health services as well as how these are and should be organised.

Background: Transgender people are disproportionately affected by HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) worldwide, and culturally competent prevention and treatment services are often unavailable or inaccessible. Despite recent improvements in national HIV responses for many key populations in east Africa, evidence of effective responses informed by transgender sexual health needs is sparse. We aimed to assess gender identity among men and transgender people who have sex with men in Kenya, and to explore its associations with sexual health-related outcomes, risk behaviours, and uptake of HIV prevention and care interventions., Methods: We did a cross-sectional study in Nairobi, Kenya, and recruited adult cisgender men and transfeminine people who reported having sex with men, through respondent-driven sampling. Inclusion criteria were possession of a valid study coupon, being aged 18 years or older, having male sex assignment at birth or male gender identification currently, living within 50 km of Nairobi, and having had consensual anal or oral sexual activity with a man in the previous 12 months. Seed participants were identified by three community organisations that provide targeted health-care services to gay, bisexual, or other men who have sex with men (MSM) communities in Nairobi. We assessed gender identity, sociodemographics, sexual behaviour, and HIV prevention and care uptake, by self-completed survey. Participants were tested for HIV, syphilis, and rectal and urethral gonorrhoea and chlamydia. We compared prevalence of sexual health outcomes, risk behaviour, and HIV prevention and care service uptake among transfeminine and cisgender participants, using multivariable robust Poisson regression models, with gender identity as the independent variable., Findings: Between May 4 and Dec 8, 2017, we enrolled 618 participants. Six participants did not answer the questions on sex assigned at birth and gender identity and so were excluded from the analyses. 522 (sample-weighted percentage 86%) of 612 participants were classified as cisgender men, 70 (11%) as transfeminine, and three (<1%) as transmasculine. 17 participants (2%) did not identify as male, female, or transgender. Compared with cisgender men, transfeminine people were more likely to be HIV-positive (28 [41%] of 70 transfeminine vs 151 [25%] of 521 cisgender men; p=0·0009) and to report current symptoms consistent with a rectal STI (eight [16%] of 67 vs 38 [7%] of 518; p=0·014). Transfeminine people reported higher numbers of recent male sexual partners (22 [27%] of 70 transfeminine people reported four or more male sexual partners in the past 3 months vs 112 [13%] of 522 cisgender men; p=0·042) and were more likely to report condomless anal intercourse with men (43 [62%] of 70 vs 208 [39%] of 522; p=0·0009) and receptive anal intercourse (54 [76%] of 70 vs 252 [46%] of 522; p<0·0001) in the past 3 months, and transactional sex with men (42 [57%] of 69 vs 240 [42%] of 518; p=0·023) and experience of sexual assault (16 [23%] of 69 vs 65 [11%] of 520; p=0·019) in the past 12 months. Use of pre-exposure prophylaxis and post-exposure prophylaxis was low in both groups., Interpretation: Transfeminine people who have sex with men have a higher burden of HIV and associated risk behaviours compared with cisgender MSM in the same context, yet their uptake of prevention and care services is poor. Policies should acknowledge the specific needs of transfeminine people as distinct from cisgender MSM, and support health-care providers to address these needs., Funding: Evidence for HIV Prevention in Southern Africa (EHPSA), UK Aid., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: There is little published literature about gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men and transgender individuals (MSM and TG)'s use of social media in sub-Saharan Africa, despite repressive social and/or criminalizing contexts that limit access to physical HIV prevention. We sought to describe MSM and TG's online socializing in Nairobi and Johannesburg, identifying the characteristics of those socializing online and those not, in order to inform the development of research and health promotion in online environments., Methods: Respondent-driven sampling surveys were conducted in 2017 in Nairobi (n = 618) and Johannesburg (n = 301) with those reporting current male gender identity or male sex assigned at birth and sex with a man in the last 12 months. Online socializing patterns, sociodemographic, sexual behaviour and HIV-testing data were collected. We examined associations between social media use and sociodemographic characteristics and sexual behaviours among all, and only those HIV-uninfected, using logistic regression. Analyses were RDS-II weighted. Thirty qualitative interviews were conducted with MSM and TG in each city, which examined the broader context of and motivations for social media use., Results: Most MSM and TG had used social media to socialize with MSM in the last month (60% Johannesburg, 71% Nairobi), mostly using generic platforms (e.g. Facebook), but also gay-specific (e.g. Grindr). HIV-uninfected MSM and TG reporting riskier recent sexual behaviours had raised odds of social media use in Nairobi, including receptive anal intercourse (adjusted OR = 2.15, p = 0.006), buying (aOR = 2.24, p = 0.015) and selling sex with men (aOR = 2.17, p = 0.004). Evidence for these associations was weaker in Johannesburg, though socializing online was associated with condomless anal intercourse (aOR = 3.67, p = 0.003) and active syphilis (aOR = 13.50, p = 0.016). Qualitative findings indicated that while online socializing can limit risk of harm inherent in face-to-face interactions, novel challenges were introduced, including context collapse and a fear of blackmail., Conclusions: Most MSM and TG in these cities socialize online regularly. Users reported HIV acquisition risk behaviours, yet this space is not fully utilized for sexual health promotion and research engagement. Effective, safe and acceptable means of using online channels to engage with MSM/TG that account for MSM and TG's strategies and concerns for managing online security should now be explored, as complements or alternatives to existing outreach., (© 2020 The Authors. Journal of the International AIDS Society published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International AIDS Society.)