Search

Objectives: To improve visceral leishmaniasis (VL) treatment in Eastern Africa, 14- and 28-day combination regimens of paromomycin plus allometrically dosed miltefosine were evaluated. As the majority of patients affected by VL are children, adequate paediatric exposure to miltefosine and paromomycin is key to ensuring good treatment response., Methods: Pharmacokinetic data were collected in a multicentre randomized controlled trial in VL patients from Kenya, Sudan, Ethiopia and Uganda. Patients received paromomycin (20 mg/kg/day for 14 days) plus miltefosine (allometric dose for 14 or 28 days). Population pharmacokinetic models were developed. Adequacy of exposure and target attainment of paromomycin and miltefosine were evaluated in children and adults., Results: Data from 265 patients (59% ≤12 years) were available for this pharmacokinetic analysis. Paromomycin exposure was lower in paediatric patients compared with adults [median (IQR) end-of-treatment AUC0-24h 187 (162-203) and 242 (217-328) µg·h/mL, respectively], but were both within the IQR of end-of-treatment exposure in Kenyan and Sudanese adult patients from a previous study. Cumulative miltefosine end-of-treatment exposure in paediatric patients and adults [AUCD0-28 517 (464-552) and 524 (456-567) µg·day/mL, respectively] and target attainment [time above the in vitro susceptibility value EC90 27 (25-28) and 30 (28-32) days, respectively] were comparable to previously observed values in adults., Conclusions: Paromomycin and miltefosine exposure in this new combination regimen corresponded to the desirable levels of exposure, supporting the implementation of the shortened 14 day combination regimen. Moreover, the lack of a clear exposure-response and exposure-toxicity relationship indicated adequate exposure within the therapeutic range in the studied population, including paediatric patients., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.)

Introduction: Intramuscular paromomycin monotherapy to treat visceral leishmaniasis (VL) has been shown to be effective for Indian patients, while a similar regimen resulted in lower efficacy in Eastern Africa, which could be related to differences in paromomycin pharmacokinetics., Methods: Pharmacokinetic data were available from two randomized controlled trials in VL patients from Eastern Africa and India. African patients received intramuscular paromomycin monotherapy (20 mg/kg for 21 days) or combination therapy (15 mg/kg for 17 days) with sodium stibogluconate. Indian patients received paromomycin monotherapy (15 mg/kg for 21 days). A population pharmacokinetic model was developed for paromomycin in Eastern African and Indian VL patients., Results: Seventy-four African patients (388 observations) and 528 Indian patients (1321 observations) were included in this pharmacokinetic analysis. A one-compartment model with first-order kinetics of absorption and elimination best described paromomycin in plasma. Bioavailability (relative standard error) was 1.17 (5.18%) times higher in Kenyan and Sudanese patients, and 2.46 (24.5%) times higher in Ethiopian patients, compared with Indian patients. Ethiopian patients had an approximately fourfold slower absorption rate constant of 0.446 h -1 (18.2%). Area under the plasma concentration-time curve for 24 h at steady-state (AUC τ,SS ) for 15 mg/kg/day (median [interquartile range]) was higher in Kenya and Sudan (172.7 µg·h/mL [145.9-214.3]) and Ethiopia (230.1 µg·h/mL [146.3-591.2]) compared with India (97.26 µg·h/mL [80.83-123.4])., Conclusion: The developed model provides detailed insight into the pharmacokinetic differences among Eastern African countries and India, however the resulting differences in paromomycin exposure do not seem to explain the geographical differences in paromomycin efficacy in the treatment of VL patients., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a serious and fatal disease caused by the parasites Leishmania infantum and Leishmania donovani The gold standard diagnostic test for VL is the demonstration of parasites or their DNA in spleen, lymph node, or bone marrow aspirates. Serological tests exist but cannot distinguish active VL from either prior exposure to the parasites or previously treated VL disease. Using mass spectroscopy, we have previously identified three L. infantum protein biomarkers ( Li-isd1 , Li-txn1 , and Li-ntf2 ) in the urine of VL patients and developed a sensitive and specific urine-based antigen detection assay for the diagnosis of VL that occurs in Brazil (where VL is caused by L. infantum ). However, unpublished observations from our laboratory at DetectoGen showed that these biomarkers were detected in only 55% to 60% of VL patients from India and Kenya, where the disease is caused by L. donovani Here, we report the discovery and characterization of two new biomarkers of L. donovani ( Ld-mao1 and Ld-ppi1 ) present in the urine of VL patients from these two countries. Capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays using specific rabbit IgG and chicken IgY were developed, and the assays had sensitivities of 44.4% and 28.8% for the detection of Ld-mao1 and Ld-ppi1 , respectively. In contrast, a multiplexed assay designed to simultaneously detect all five leishmanial biomarkers markedly increased the assay sensitivity to 82.2%. These results validate the utility of leishmanial protein biomarkers found in the urine of VL patients as powerful tools for the development of an accurate diagnostic test for this disease., (Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology.)

The Leishmania parasite resides and replicates within host macrophages during visceral leishmaniasis (VL). This study aimed to evaluate neopterin, a marker of macrophage activation, as possible pharmacodynamic biomarker to monitor VL treatment response and to predict long-term clinical relapse of VL. Following informed consent, 497 plasma samples were collected from East-African VL patients receiving a 28-day miltefosine monotherapy (48 patients) or 11-day combination therapy of miltefosine and liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB, 48 patients). Neopterin was quantified with ELISA. Values are reported as median (inter-quartile range). Baseline neopterin concentrations were elevated in all VL patients at 98.8 (63.9-135) nmol/L compared to reported levels for healthy controls (<10 nmol/L). During the first treatment week, concentrations remained stable in monotherapy patients ( p = 0.807), but decreased two-fold compared to baseline in the combination therapy patients ( p < 0.01). In the combination therapy arm, neopterin concentrations increased significantly 1 day after L-AMB infusion compared to baseline for cured patients [137 (98.5-197) nmol/L, p < 0.01], but not for relapsing patients [84.4 (68.9-106) nmol/L, p = 0.96]. The neopterin parameter with the highest predictive power for VL relapse was a higher than 8% neopterin concentration increase between end of treatment and day 60 follow-up (ROC AUC 0.84), with a 93% sensitivity and 65% specificity. In conclusion, the identified neopterin parameter could be a potentially useful surrogate endpoint to identify patients in clinical trials at risk of relapse earlier during follow-up, possibly in a panel of biomarkers to increase its specificity.

Background: Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a parasitic disease transmitted by sandflies and is fatal if left untreated. Phase II trials of new treatment regimens for VL are primarily carried out to evaluate safety and efficacy, while pharmacokinetic data are also important to inform future combination treatment regimens. The efficacy of VL treatments is evaluated at two time points, initial cure, when treatment is completed and definitive cure, commonly 6 months post end of treatment, to allow for slow response to treatment and detection of relapses. This paper investigates a generalization of the triangular design to impose a minimum sample size for pharmacokinetic or other analyses, and methods to estimate efficacy at extended follow-up accounting for the sequential design and changes in cure status during extended follow-up., Methods: We provided R functions that generalize the triangular design to impose a minimum sample size before allowing stopping for efficacy. For estimation of efficacy at a second, extended, follow-up time, the performance of a shrinkage estimator (SHE), a probability tree estimator (PTE) and the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) for estimation was assessed by simulation., Results: The SHE and PTE are viable approaches to estimate an extended follow-up although the SHE performed better than the PTE: the bias and root mean square error were lower and coverage probabilities higher., Conclusions: Generalization of the triangular design is simple to implement for adaptations to meet requirements for pharmacokinetic analyses. Using the simple MLE approach to estimate efficacy at extended follow-up will lead to biased results, generally over-estimating treatment success. The SHE is recommended in trials of two or more treatments. The PTE is an acceptable alternative for one-arm trials or where use of the SHE is not possible due to computational complexity., Trial Registration: NCT01067443 , February 2010.