Search

Simple Summary: Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) using S-1 has demonstrated favorable outcomes for patients with pancreatic cancer (PC). However, the current S-1 completion rate is insufficient to achieve its benefits. Moreover, an absence of dependable markers to forecast S-1 completion warrants C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) investigation as a potential predictive factor related to nutritional status. Previously, we revealed that a postoperative CAR value of ≥0.05 serves as a marker predicting S-1 AC treatment non-completion due to adverse events (AEs) in the Ehime study. Thus, this study aims to substantiate the correlation between postoperative CAR and S-1 therapy non-completion due to AEs using an alternative cohort from another institution (the Dokkyo study). Background: S-1 in adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) administration after pancreatic cancer (PC) surgery has been standardized in Japan. The Ehime study confirmed that a postoperative higher C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) value predicted the risk of adverse event (AE)-related S-1 non-completion as an AC in patients with PC after curative surgery. This study aimed to investigate the index to predict S-1 tolerance among patients who underwent curative surgery for PC (the Dokkyo study). Methods: This retrospective validation cohort study included 172 patients at the Department of Hepato-Biliary Pancreatic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Japan, from January 2010 to December 2022. All patients underwent nutritional screening using the postoperative CAR. S-1 completion status and its effect on prognosis were systematically followed up and investigated. We conducted a statistical analysis of predictive markers to investigate their association with S-1 completion. Results: Patients were categorized into the S-1 completion (N = 91) and non-completion (N = 81) groups. The S-1 completion group demonstrated a significantly lower CAR than the S1 non-completion group. Moreover, the current study revealed a significant difference in the S-1 completion rate, applying the CAR cutoff value of 0.05 established in the Ehime study. Additionally, univariate and multivariate analyses confirmed that a CAR of <0.05 was significantly associated with S-1 completion. Conclusions: The Dokkyo study confirmed the results observed in the Ehime study. Consequently, an increased postoperative CAR value appeared as a universal applicable marker for the risk factor of AE-related S-1 non-completion after curative surgery for patients with PC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although there is insufficient evidence for the treatment of older patients with advanced gastric cancer, fluorouracil combined with platinum chemotherapy has been recognized as a standard first-line treatment for such populations in Japan despite the lack of efficacy and toxicity data. Methods: Patients aged 75 years or older with advanced gastric cancer were enrolled. S-1 plus docetaxel (docetaxel: 40 mg/m2, day 1; S-1: 80 mg/m2, days 1–14; q21 days) was repeated every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall response rate. Secondary endpoints were safety, progression-free survival, time to treatment failure, and overall survival. The sample size was calculated as 30 under the hypothesis of an expected response rate of 40% and a threshold response rate of 20%, at a power of 90% and a two-sided alpha value of 5%. Results: From February 2010 to January 2015, 31 patients were enrolled and assessed for efficacy and toxicity. The response rate was 45.2% (95% CI 27.3%–64.0%; p = 0.001) and it exceeded the expected response rate set at 40%. Median progression-free survival was 5.8 months, the 1-year survival rate was 58.1%, and the median survival time was 16.1 months. The major grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (58%), febrile neutropenia (13%), anemia (10%), anorexia (10%), and fatigue (6%). Conclusions: These findings indicate that S-1 plus docetaxel as first-line treatment for older patients is feasible and that it has promising efficacy against advanced gastric cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: S-1 plus docetaxel (DS) therapy followed by S-1 is the standard of care in Japan in postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III gastric cancer, but long-term survival and the number of DS cycles required are unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of the number of cycles of DS therapy on the 5-year survival in stage III gastric cancer in a pooled analysis of two phase II trials (OGSG0604 and OGSG1002). Patients and methods: Patients with histologically confirmed stage III gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy were enrolled in this pooled analysis. They received DS therapy for four or eight cycles, followed by S-1 until 1 year postgastrectomy. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and the 5-year disease free survival (DFS) by the landmark analysis was evaluated. Results: In total, 113 patients from the OGSG0604 and OGSG1002 trials were enrolled in this study. The landmark analysis showed a 5-year OS that was better with four to eight cycles of DS therapy than with one to three cycles of DS therapy, with the best 5-year OS of 77.4% (95% confidence interval, 66.5–90.1%) for eight cycles. The 5-year DFS was approximately 66% when four or eight cycles of DS therapy were given. Conclusion: Although eight cycles of DS therapy may prolong prognosis, the present study did not provide a clear conclusion as to how many DS therapy cycles are needed to improve prognosis after D2 gastrectomy for stage III gastric cancer. Trial registration: Registration number: UMIN00000714 and UMIN000004440. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Based on the Japan Adjuvant Study Group of Pancreatic Cancer-01 results, S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy has been the standard in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients in Japan and elsewhere, initiated within 10 weeks after surgery. To assess the clinical impact of this timing, we conducted a secondary analysis of a nationwide survey by the Japan Pancreas Society. Methods: A total of 3361 patients were divided into two groups: 2681 (79.8%) initiating the therapy within 10 weeks after surgery (standard) and 680 (20.2%) after 10 weeks (delayed). We compared recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model with conditional landmark analysis between the groups. Results were verified by adjustment with inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis. Results: The median timing of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy initiation was 50 days (interquartile range: 38–66). In the standard group, 5-year RFS and OS rates were 32.3–48.7%, respectively, compared with 25.0–38.7% in the delayed group. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals were 0.84 (0.76–0.93) for RFS (p < 0.001) and 0.77 (0.69–0.87) for OS (p < 0.001). The IPTW analysis yielded 5-year RFS rates of 32.1% and 25.3% in the standard versus delayed group, respectively [HR = 0.86 (0.77–0.96), p < 0.001] and 5-year OS rates of 48.3% and 39.8%, respectively [HR = 0.81 (0.71–0.92), p < 0.001]. Conclusions: Initiation of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy in resected PDAC patients within 10 weeks after surgery may offer survival benefit over later initiation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Venous invasion (VI) in pathological examination of surgically resected gastric cancer (GC) may predict postoperative recurrence, but there are no objective criteria for VI grading. Methods: 157 GC patients (pathological stages I 82, II 34, and III 41) who underwent surgery with curative intent were analyzed. VI was graded in pathological examination by elastica van Gieson staining based on the number of VIs per glass slide as follows: v0, 0; v1, 1−3; v2, 4−6; and v3, ≥ 7. Filling-type invasion in veins with a minor axis of ≥ 1 mm increased the grade by 1. The association of VI grade with prognosis was statistically analyzed. Results: Recurrence increased with VI grade (v0 1.5%, v1 29.6%, v2 41.7%, v3 78.6%). VI grade as well as pathological (p) tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) stage was a significant recurrence predictor by the multivariate Cox analysis. VI grade was implicated in hematogenous and peritoneal recurrences independent of pTNM stage but not in nodal recurrence. GC was then divided into two tiers, without indication of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) (pStage I, pT1 and pT3N0) and with AC indication (pStages remaining II/III), based on the ACTS-GC trial, which is common in Japan and East Asia. VI grade was a significant recurrence predictor in both tiers. v2/v3 revealed a significantly worse recurrence-free survival (RFS) than v0/v1 in GC without AC indication. v0/v1 exhibited RFS rate exceeding 95% even after 5 years but that of v2/v3 fell around 70% within one year postoperatively, suggesting that AC may be considered for this tier with v2/v3. GC with AC indication exhibited dismal RFS according to the VI grade. RFS rate fell below 80% within one year postoperatively when VI was positive, while recurrence was not observed in v0, which was, however, rare in this tier (10.9%). Differentiation grade did not significantly affect postoperative prognosis in both tiers. Conclusions: VI grade was a significant predictor of postoperative GC recurrence irrespective of the AC indication based on the ACTS-GC study and this VI grading system could be applied in future studies of adjuvant therapy in GC presently deemed without AC indication in Japan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Surgical resection of oligo-metastasis in gastric cancer (GC) is weakly recommended for patients without other incurable factors in the Japanese GC Treatment Guidelines. While post-operative chemotherapy is the standard treatment in patients with stage II or III GC, its efficacy for resected stage IV GC is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of post-operative chemotherapy after curative resection of GC with oligo-metastasis. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with GC who were diagnosed with synchronous oligo-metastasis at 20 institutions in Japan between 2007 and 2012. The selection criteria were: adenocarcinoma, stage IV with oligo-metastasis at liver or lymph node without other distant metastasis, curative resection including synchronous oligo-metastasis, and no prior treatment of GC before surgery. Results: A total of 110 patients were collected. Of the 94 eligible patients, 84 underwent gastrectomy with surgical resection of oligo-metastasis (39 [41%] liver metastasis and 55, [59%] distant lymph node metastasis), followed by post-operative chemotherapy with S-1 (S1: n = 55), S1 plus cisplatin (CS: n = 22), or Others (n = 7). Moreover, 10 patients did not receive post-operative chemotherapy (Non-Cx). The median overall survival (OS) was 35.2 and 11.1 months in the post-operative chemotherapy and Non-Cx groups (hazard ratio, 3.56; 95% confidence interval, 1.74–7.30; p < 0.001), respectively. In multivariable analysis, Non-Cx and age over 70 years were identified as poor prognostic factors for OS (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Curative resection followed by post-operative chemotherapy in patients with GC with synchronous oligo-metastasis showed favorable survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: S-1 monotherapy had previously been widely used as a second-line treatment for pancreatic cancer (PC) after gemcitabine-based chemotherapy mainly in Japan. Based on the results of the NAPOLI-1 trial, the recommended second-line therapy is now liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil/folinic acid (nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV). However, there have been no studies comparing nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV therapy with S-1 monotherapy., Methods: The main objective of this study was to compare overall survival (OS) in patients treated with nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV and those treated with S-1 monotherapy as second-line treatments, using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method. This study was conducted in 31 institutions participating in Japan Oncology Network in Hepatobiliary and Pancreas. To minimize potential biases due to the retrospective design, IPTW analysis was performed with multiple imputation, and imputed IPTW-adjusted hazard ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model and combined into pooled estimates., Results: A total of 463 metastatic PC patients were enrolled in this study (257 in the S-1 monotherapy group and 206 in the nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV group). The median OS was 7.50 months (95% CI 4.18-12.69 months) in the nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV group and 5.72 months (95% CI 2.76-10.79 months) in the S-1 monotherapy group. In the IPTW-adjusted Cox proportional hazards model, nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV was associated with a significant OS benefit (pooled IPTW-adjusted hazard ratio, 0.779; 95% CI 0.399-0.941; p = 0.025)., Conclusion: These findings support the use of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV as standard second-line treatment for PC patients after gemcitabine-based chemotherapy., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflict of interest: Hiroshi Imaoka has received research funding from Ono Pharmaceutical, Servier, Novartis, and Boehringer Ingelheim; and honoraria from Servier and Novartis. Masafumi Ikeda has received research funding from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Chiome Bioscience, Delta-Fly Pharma, Eisai, Eli Lilly Japan, Invitae, MSD, J-Pharma, Merck biopharma, Merus N.V., Novartis, Servier, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, and Syneos Health; and honoraria from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eisai, Eli Lilly Japan, Fujifilm Toyama Chemical, Guardant Health Japan, Incyte Biosciences Japan, MSD, Servier, Novartis, Nippon Kayaku, Ono Pharmaceutical, Taisho Pharmaceutical, Teijin, Takeda, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Yakult Honsha; and is a member of advisory board for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai Pharmaceutical, MSD, and Servier. Satoshi Kobayashi has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Boston Scientific, Taiho, Daiichi Sankyo, and Yakult Honsha. Yasuyuki Kawamoto has received research funding from Takeda. Noritoshi Kobayashi has received research funding from Novartis; and honoraria from Novartis, Teijin Pharma, Teijin Healthcare, EA Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Yakult Honsha, MSD, and PD Radiopharma (successor to the radiopharmaceutical business of Fujifilm Toyama Chemical). Naohiro Okano has received honoraria from AstraZeneca. Kumiko Umemoto has received honoraria from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Novartis and Yakult Honsha. Ayumu Hosokawa has received honoraria from Ono Pharmaceutical and Daiichi Sankyo. Hiroyuki Okuyama has received honoraria from Novartis and AstraZeneca. Satoshi Shimizu has received research funding from AstraZeneca, Incyte, Delta-Fly Pharma, and Servier. Chigusa Morizane has received research funding from Eisai, Yakult Honsha, Ono Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, J-Pharma, AstraZeneca, Merck, Daiichi Sankyo, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eisai, Daiichi Sankyo RD Novare, Labcorp, Hitachi, and MSD; and honoraria from Novartis, Yakult Honsha, Servier, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Eisai, MSD, AstraZeneca, TORAY, Guardant, and Myriad Genetics; and is a member of advisory board for Yakult Honsha, MSD, Servier, Boehringer Ingelheim, Taiho, Novartis, AstraZeneca, MSD, Servier, and Merck. Makoto Ueno has received research funding from Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Chiome Bioscience, Chugai Pharmaceutical, DFP, Eisai, Incyte, J-pharma, MSD, Novartis, Novocure, Ono Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Servier; and honoraria from AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Incyte, J-pharma, MSD, Servier, Ono Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Yakult Honsha. The other authors have no conflict of interest., (© 2025. The Author(s).)

Background: Combination chemotherapy is used to treat advanced thymic carcinoma; however, the effects are insufficient. Methods: Previously untreated patients with unresectable locally advanced thymic carcinoma received two cycles of 80 mg/m2/day S‐1 orally on days 1–14 plus 60 mg/m2/day cisplatin intravenously on day 1, and concurrent radiotherapy (60 Gy). Results: Three patients were enrolled into the study. Toxicity and survival were assessable in all patients, but the treatment response was only assessable in one patient. The study was terminated because of poor case recruitment. The patients' characteristics were as follows: male/female = 2/1; PS 0/1 = 2/1; median age (range) = 59 (55–72); and stage III/IV = 2/1. The patient in which the treatment response was assessed exhibited SD (response rate: 0%). In both nonevaluable cases, the second course of chemotherapy was judged to be post‐protocol treatment because it was delayed by ≥14 days, but a CR and PR were achieved after the end of the study, respectively. G4 leukopenia/neutropenia and G3 febrile neutropenia occurred in one patient each (33%). The median time to tumor progression was 17.6 months, and the 1‐, 2‐, 3‐, and 4‐year survival rates were 67, 33, 33, and 33%, respectively. The median overall survival time was not reached, and the 1‐, 2‐, 3‐, and 4‐year survival rates were 100, 67, 67, and 67%, respectively. Conclusions: Although it was difficult to recruit patients, there was a long‐term survivor >4 years who appeared to have achieved a CR, indicating that such chemoradiotherapy may be effective against locally advanced thymic carcinoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The mainstream first-line chemotherapy for advanced/recurrent gastric cancer (ARGC) is combination therapy including platinum-based agents. With the progressive aging of the society, the incidence of gastric cancer in elderly patients is increasing. However, elderly patients cannot tolerate these agents because of renal dysfunction or low quality of life. The KSCC1701 study explored the efficacy and safety of S-1 + ramucirumab in elderly patients with ARGC. Chemotherapy-naive patients aged ≥70 years with ARGC were eligible. Patients received S-1 (40–60 mg twice daily for 4 weeks in 6-week cycles) and ramucirumab (8 mg/kg every 2 weeks) until disease progression. The primary end-point was the 1-year overall survival (OS) rate. The anticipated lower threshold of 1-year survival was set at 40% in light of previous S-1–based regimens. The secondary end-points included progression-free survival (PFS), OS, the overall response rate (ORR) and safety. Between September 2017 and November 2019, 48 patients (34 men and 14 women) were enrolled in this study. The median patient age was 77.5 years, and all patients had a performance status of 0 (n = 20) or 1 (n = 28). The 1-year OS rate was 65.2%, which met the primary end-point. The median survival time and median PFS were 16.4 and 5.8 months, respectively. The ORR was 41.9%. The most frequent grade 3/4 (≥15%) adverse events were neutropenia, anorexia and anaemia. Considering these findings, S-1 + ramucirumab appears to be an excellent treatment option for elderly patients with ARGC. (250 words). This trial has been registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials Registry under the number jRCTs071180066. • Elderly ARGC patients with good performance status were enrolled. • Explored the efficacy and safety of S-1 + ramucirumab, achieved good OS. • PFS and ORR were also sufficient results. • Frequent grade 3/4 (≥15%) adverse events were neutropenia, anorexia and anaemia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The clinical effectiveness of triple chemotherapy consisting of gemcitabine, cisplatin plus either S-1 (GCS), durvalumab (DGC), or pembrolizumab (PGC) as first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) has been reported. However, their comparative cost-effectiveness is unclear. We conducted a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of Japanese healthcare payer., Methods: A 10-year partitioned survival model was constructed by comparing the time-dependent hazards of the KHBO1401-MITSUBA, TOPAZ-1, and KEYNOTE-966 trials. The cost and utility came from previously published reports. Quality-adjusted life years (QALY) were used to measure the effects on health. Costs for direct medical care were taken into account. There was a one-way analysis and a probability sensitivity analysis. A willingness-to-pay threshold of 7.5 million yen (57,034 USD) per QALY was defined., Results: The incremental costs per QALY for GCS, DGC, and PGC in the base case study were 3,779,374 JPY (28,740 USD), 86,058,056 JPY (65,4434 USD), and 28,982,059 JPY (220,396 USD), respectively. No parameter had an influence beyond the threshold in a one-way sensitivity analysis. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that the probability of GCS, DGC, and PGC being cost-effective at the threshold was 85.6%, 0%, and 0%, respectively., Conclusion: Given the current circumstances, it is probable that triple therapy utilizing GCS will emerge as a plausible and efficient primary chemotherapy strategy for patients with advanced BTC in the Japanese healthcare system, as opposed to DGC and PGC., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Summary: Background Combination therapy of gemcitabine with cisplatin (GC) is a standard first-line therapy for unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer (BTC). S-1 is often used as a second-line therapy in clinical practice, based on the results of some clinical studies investigating its efficacy and safety following gemcitabine monotherapy. However, few studies have reported on the clinical outcomes of S-1 following GC. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the efficacy and safety of S-1 following GC for unresectable and recurrent BTC. Methods We retrospectively collected the data of 116 patients (pts) who were treated with S-1 as a second-line therapy following GC for unresectable or recurrent BTC at Shizuoka Cancer Center (November 2009 to July 2019). Results Of these 116 pts., 84 were assessable. Patient characteristics were as follows: intrahepatic bile duct/extrahepatic bile duct/gallbladder cancer, 30/23/31 pts.; metastatic/recurrent/locally advanced, 57/17/10 pts. The median time to treatment failure and overall survival were 2.5 and 6.0 months, respectively. Among 65 pts. with measurable lesions, the overall response rate was 3.1% (2/65 pts) and the disease control rate was 24.6% (19/65 pts). The common grade 3/4 toxicities included anemia (12%), neutropenia (4%), infections (16%), fatigue (6%), and diarrhea (4%). Dose reduction or treatment schedule modification of S-1 was required in 29 pts. (34.5%), and 17 pts. (20%) terminated S-1 due to adverse events. Conclusions The efficacy and safety of S-1 following GC were almost the same as those of S-1 following GEM monotherapy for unresectable or recurrent BTC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is still a highly fatal malignancy among the most common cancers. More powerful treatments are expecting to bring hope for patients. Biweekly gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel/S-1 (GAS) was proved safe and effective for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer in Japan. The objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and toxicity of GAS (repeated every 3 weeks) in the treatment of locally advanced or advanced pancreatic cancer and determine the recommended dose of S-1 in this combination.Methods: This is an open-label, single-arm, and single-center phase I trial. Patients who have been diagnosed with locally advanced or advanced PDAC pathologically without previous systemic treatments will be enrolled and be treated with GAS chemotherapy every 3 weeks (nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m 2, ivgtt, day1, 8; gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, day1, 8; different doses of S-1 within a dose escalation scheme) until the presence of disease progression (PD), intolerable adverse events (AEs), or requirement of patients and researchers. The primary endpoints are maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). The secondary endpoints include safety, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).Discussion: This trial will adjust the administration of GAS to make it more effective for Chinese patients, while exploring the toxicity and feasibility of this adjustment.Trial Registration: ChiCTR, ( ChiCTR1900027833 ). Registered 30 November 2019. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Background Aflibercept, a recombinant fusion protein binding VEGF-A, VEGF-B and placental growth factor, inhibits tumor growth by blocking angiogenesis. The aim of this phase I dose-escalation study was to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of aflibercept in combination with S-1 in Japanese patients with solid tumors. Patients and methods Sequential cohorts of 3–6 patients with metastatic or unresectable solid tumors, who had failed at least one prior line of standard treatment or who were not suitable for such treatment, were to receive escalating doses of aflibercept every 2 weeks, starting at 2 mg/kg, combined with S-1 at 40 mg/m2 twice daily (80 mg/m2/day; 4 weeks on/2 weeks off). Dose-escalation was to be based on the incidence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis. Results At the first dose level (aflibercept 2 mg/kg plus S-1) 1 of 6 patients experienced a DLT (grade 4 proteinuria). The aflibercept dose was consequently escalated to 4 mg/kg; 1 of 3 patients treated at this dose level had a DLT (grade 2 pleural effusion), and another patient experienced grade 3 reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome after the DLT assessment period. Additional patients were therefore enrolled into the first dose level to explore safety and tolerability. The study was subsequently terminated prematurely. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached and the RP2D was not determined in Japanese patients. Conclusions The tolerability and safety of aflibercept 2 mg/kg in combination with S-1 was confirmed in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Owing to the rarity of this tumor, there is limited information about second‐line chemotherapy for patients with previously treated advanced thymic carcinoma. Material and Methods: We performed a multi‐institutional, retrospective study named NEJ023 for patients with advanced thymic carcinoma. Patients without indications for curative treatment were treated with chemotherapy from 1995 to 2014 at 40 institutions in the North East Japan Study Group. Demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics, data on treatment methods, and outcomes of second‐line chemotherapy were obtained from medical records. Results: In total, 191 patients were enrolled in this study. Second‐line chemotherapy included platinum‐based doublets in 57.6% of patients, other multidrug chemotherapy (e.g., cisplatin, doxorubicin, vincristine, and cyclophosphamide) in 13.6%, and monotherapy in 28.8%. The median follow‐up time was 50.5 months, and the median overall survival (OS) from the start of second‐line chemotherapy was 22.4 (95% confidence interval, 17.5‐26.7) months. The average response rate (RR) was 20.0% overall; it was 21.6% for patients treated with platinum‐based doublet chemotherapy, 13.6% for those treated with other multidrug chemotherapy, and 19.6% for those treated with single agent chemotherapy. There was no significant difference in OS between platinum‐based doublet chemotherapy, other multidrug chemotherapy, and monotherapy (the median OS was 22.4, 25.7, and 21.4 months, respectively). Conclusion: The median OS was 22.4 months in patients with advanced thymic carcinoma treated with second‐line chemotherapy. There were no significant differences in RR and OS between monotherapy and multidrug chemotherapy in this study. Implications for Practice: Owing to the rarity of this tumor, there is limited information about second‐line chemotherapy for patients with previously treated advanced thymic carcinoma. This is the largest data for those patients treated with second‐line chemotherapy. This study suggests there is no significant difference in efficacy between monotherapy and multidrug chemotherapy for previously treated advanced thymic carcinoma. This result can support the adequacy to select monotherapy as treatment of those patients. Thymic carcinoma is rare and highly progressive. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of second‐line chemotherapy for patients previously treated for advanced thymic carcinoma and to identify promising chemotherapeutic regimens for clinical practice and further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Trastuzumab with cisplatin and fluoropyrimidines improves overall survival (OS) in patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer (AGC). S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) is one of the standard regimens for HER2-negative AGC in Japan. However, few studies have evaluated trastuzumab combined with SOX in patients with HER2-positive AGC. Methods: This was a multicenter, phase II study conducted at 10 institutions in Japan. Patients with HER2-positive AGC received S-1 twice a day on days 1–14 and oxaliplatin and trastuzumab on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint was the confirmed overall response rate (ORR), and the secondary endpoints were OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. The sample size was 75 to have 90% power with an alpha error of 0.1 (one-sided), expecting an ORR of 65% and threshold of 50%. Results: From June 2015 to January 2018, 75 patients were enrolled. The ORR was 70.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 59.0–80.6]. The median OS and PFS were estimated as 18.1 months (95% CI 15.6–26.5) and 8.8 months (95% CI 7.4–12.2), respectively. The major grade 3 or 4 adverse events were sensory neuropathy (16.0%) and neutropenia (10.7%). Conclusions: Trastuzumab with SOX had promising activity with well-tolerated toxicities for patients with HER2-positive AGC. Clinical trial registration: UMIN000017602. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Adjuvant S-1 monotherapy prolongs the survival of patients with pathological stage II or III gastric cancer undergoing D2 gastrectomy. This therapeutic regimen is standard in Japan. Unfortunately, some patients who undergo this treatment suffer from recurrent disease. However, information regarding the timing and site-specific trends of recurrence is insufficient. Methods: Among 396 patients who underwent D2 gastrectomy followed by adjuvant S-1 monotherapy between 2008 and 2012, 122 experienced a recurrence. We retrospectively determined the timing and sites of recurrence. Results: The median RFS of the 122 patients was 19.5 months, and their 1-, 3- and 5-year RFS rates were 67.2%, 23.0% and 5.7%, respectively. There were no significant differences in RFS among disease substages. Local recurrence, lymph node involvement and peritoneal and hematogenous metastases were found in 6, 25, 63 and 42 patients, respectively. Approximately 10% of patients presented with contemporaneous sites of recurrence. Local recurrence and lymph node metastasis plateaued 3 years after gastrectomy. Peritoneal and hematogenous metastasis increased within 5 years after surgery. In patients with hematogenous metastasis, the number of liver metastases plateaued but increased in others. Conclusions: In patients with recurrent disease who underwent D2 gastrectomy followed by adjuvant S-1 monotherapy, 80% of recurrences occur within 3 years after gastrectomy. The timing of recurrence is not significantly different among substages. Although the rates of local recurrence and lymph node and liver metastasis plateau after 3 years, peritoneal and the other hematogenous metastases increase within 5 years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Background This first-in-human phase 1 study assessed the safety of TAS-114, a novel deoxyuridine triphosphatase inhibitor, combined with S-1 to determine its maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD). Methods In this dose-escalation study with a 3 + 3 design, TAS-114 and S-1 were concurrently administered orally under fasting conditions at 5–240 mg/m2 and 30–36 mg/m2, respectively, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) were evaluated. Results Seventy-six patients were enrolled. The MTD and RD were TAS-114 200 mg/m2 plus S-1 36 mg/m2 and TAS-114 240 mg/m2 plus S-1 30 mg/m2, respectively. Common treatment-related adverse events were anemia, lymphocytopenia, leukopenia, neutropenia, decreased appetite, rash, nausea, and pigmentation disorder. Partial response (PR) was observed in 10 patients (non-small cell lung cancer [NSCLC], n = 5; pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, n = 2; gastric cancer, n = 2; gallbladder cancer, n = 1). Of these, four patients achieved PR despite prior treatment history with S-1. Patients administered TAS-114 exhibited linear PK and CYP3A4 induction, with no effect on the PK of S-1. Conclusion TAS-114 plus S-1 showed tolerable, safe, and potentially effective results. To confirm safety and efficacy, two phase 2 studies are ongoing in NSCLC and gastric cancer patients. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01610479). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Highlights • Addition of oxaliplatin to preoperative CRT with S-1 in patients with LARC might be feasible and lead to better local control than standard treatment. • We adopted a chemotherapy gap and S-1 in the regimen, and these may have been factors in the excellent results. • This trial showed that CRT with S-1 plus oxaliplatin and the incorporation of a chemotherapy gap in the third week of radiotherapy was feasible and resulted in a high pCR rate without severe toxicity and excellent loco-regional control. Abstract Purpose The study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adding oxaliplatin to py (CRT) with S-1 in patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma (LARC). We report here the final results of the study. Patients and methods Patients with histopathologically confirmed LARC (cT3-T4, any N) were eligible. They received oral S-1 (80 mg/m2/day on days 1–5, 8–12, 22–26, and 29–33) and infusional oxaliplatin (60 mg/m2/day on days 1, 8, 22, 29) plus radiotherapy (1.8 Gy/day, total dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions), with a chemotherapy gap in the third week of radiotherapy. Primary endpoint of the study was pathological complete response (pCR) rate. Secondary endpoints were rates of R0 resection, down-staging, cumulative 3-year local recurrence, 3-year disease-free survival (DFS), and toxicity. Results Forty-five patients were enrolled at six centers in Japan. All patients received CRT, and 44 underwent operation. The pCR rate was 27.3% (12/44). The R0 resection rate was 95.5% (42/44). T-down-staging rate was 59.1% (26/44), and N-down staging rate was 65.9% (29/44); the combined pathological down-staging rate was 79.5% (35/44). There were no grade 4 adverse events, but 11.1% of the patients had grade 3 adverse events. Cumulative 3-year local recurrence rate was 0%. However, 13 (30.0%) patients suffered from distant metastasis, and one patient suffered from secondary esophageal cancer that was unrelated to rectal cancer. Eight patients had lung metastasis, 4 had liver metastasis, and 3 patients died of the metastatic disease. The 3-year DFS rate of the 44 patients was 67.5% (median follow-up 36.3 months), and the 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was 93.0% (median follow-up 39.6 months). The patients were then divided into the pCR (12 patients) group and non pCR (32 patients) group. The 3-year rate of DFS for each group was 91.7% and 58.1% and that of OS was 100% and 90.3%, respectively. Conclusions The study showed a high pCR rate with no severe toxicity, good follow-up results, and good loco-regional control. Therefore, addition of oxaliplatin to preoperative CRT with S-1 in patients with LARC might be feasible and lead to better local control than standard treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Resminostat is an oral hydroxamate inhibitor of class I, IIb, and IV histone deacetylases. S-1 is widely used to treat biliary tract cancer and pancreatic cancer in Japan. We performed a phase I study of resminostat combined with S-1 as second-line or later therapy in Japanese patients with biliary tract or pancreatic cancer. A total of 27 patients were enrolled. We determined the optimal regimen for resminostat/S-1 therapy in part 1, and investigated its safety and efficacy in part 2. In part 1, 17 patients were enrolled. One DLT (anorexia and stomatitis, respectively) occurred with each of regimens 2 and 3. In part 2, an additional 10 patients received regimen 3, which was selected in part 1. Regimen 3 was resminostat (200 mg/day on Days 1 to 5 and Days 8 to 12: 5 days on/2 days off) plus S-1 (80-120 mg/day according to body surface area on Days 1 to 14) repeated every 21 days. A total of 16 patients (13 with biliary tract cancer and 3 with pancreatic cancer) received regimen 3 and it was well tolerated. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events were thrombocytopenia and anorexia (11 patients each, 69%). The disease control rate was 81.3% (84.6% for biliary tract cancer and 66.7% for pancreatic cancer, respectively). Median progression-free survival was 3.1 months (5.5 and 2.3 months), while median overall survival was 8.8 months (10.2 and 4.7 months). In conclusion, regimen 3 was well tolerated by patients with pre-treated biliary tract or pancreatic cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background In our previous randomised phase 2 study for patients with gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer, S-1 plus leucovorin improved progression-free survival compared with S-1 alone. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of TAS-118 (S-1 plus leucovorin) versus S-1 in overall survival (OS). Patients and methods This randomised, open-label, phase 3 study was conducted at 58 centres in Japan and Korea. Patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer that progressed during first-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy or recurred during or after post-operative gemcitabine-based adjuvant treatment were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either S-1 (40–60 mg, twice daily for 4 weeks in a 6-week cycle) or TAS-118 (S-1 40–60 mg plus leucovorin 25 mg, twice daily for 1 week in a 2-week cycle). The primary end-point was OS. Results A total of 603 patients were randomised, and 300 and 301 patients received TAS-118 and S-1, respectively. There was no difference in OS between groups (median OS for TAS-118 versus S-1, 7.6 months versus 7.9 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.98 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.82–1.16]; P = 0.756). Progression-free survival was significantly longer with TAS-118 than S-1 (median, 3.9 months versus 2.8 months; HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.67–0.95]; P = 0.009). There were interactions between Japan and Korea (P = 0.004) and between unresectable and recurrent disease (P = 0.025) in OS. Incidence, profile and severity of adverse events were similar between groups. Conclusion TAS-118 did not improve OS in patients with gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer compared to S-1. Further studies are needed to find patients who have benefit from adding leucovorin to S-1. Highlights • TAS-118 did not improve overall survival for gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer. • TAS-118 improved progression-free survival compared with S-1 monotherapy. • TAS-118 might be more effective than S-1 in some populations of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In Japan, S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy for 1 year is the standard of care for the treatment of stage II and III patients under 80 years old with gastric cancer after curative operation. However, the feasibility of S-1 chemotherapy in patients over 80 years old has not yet been elucidated.Methods: To clarify the current treatment situation and feasibility of S-1 treatment in patients over 80 years old, a questionnaire survey of the patients treated from January 2011 to December 2012 was conducted at 58 member institutions of the Stomach Cancer Study Group of the JCOG (Japan Clinical Oncology Group).Results: Gastrectomy was performed in 15,573 patients of all ages, and 1,660 (10.7%) patients were over 80 years of age. Of these elderly patients, 661 (4.2%) were diagnosed as stage II and III. While S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy was recommended to 248 (37.5%) of the stageII/III patients, only 99 (15.0%) of them actually received S-1. Interestingly, the creatinine clearance rate was between 30 and 80 mL/min in 87 (87.9%) of the patients suggesting that S-1 dose modification should be considered. Moreover, S-1 compliance was poor in patients with more than 15% body weight loss.Conclusion: In general practice, surgery alone can be regarded as the standard of care for stage II and III gastric cancer patients over 80 years old. The feasibility and efficacy of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy should be elucidated in a randomized control trial considering the vulnerabilities of the elderly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Oxaliplatin + S-1 is a recognized treatment regimen in Japan, but there are no Japanese clinical data on an oxaliplatin dose of 130 mg/m2. The current research involves a single-arm, prospective, phase II clinical trial to examine the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin + S-1 with an oxaliplatin dose of 130 mg/m2 to treat HER2-negative advanced/recurrent gastric cancer previously untreated with chemotherapy in Japan.Methods/design: The primary endpoint of this trial will be the response rate, and the secondary endpoints will be the safety profile of oxaliplatin + S-1, progression-free survival, the response rate in subjects under the age of 75, overall survival, time to treatment failure, duration of treatment, time to failure of strategy, and dose intensity. The threshold response rate is 45% and the expected response rate is 60%. Assuming that a one-tailed score test will be performed with an α of 0.05, 68 patients are needed to ensure a statistical power of 80%. Planned enrollment is 70 subjects and the total duration of this trial is expected to be 3 years.Discussion: Since replacing cisplatin with oxaliplatin should provide the same level of therapeutic efficacy while limiting adverse events and simplifying treatment, oxaliplatin + S-1 may be increasingly used to treat gastric cancer in Japan. Verifying the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin + S-1 with an oxaliplatin dose of 130 mg is an important task that the current trial has set out to achieve.Trial Registration: The protocol was registered at the website of the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN), Japan (protocol ID UMIN000017550) on May 29, 2015. The details are available at the following web address: http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/ . [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of replacing standard intravenous therapy (taxane) with oral S-1 therapy for first-line metastatic breast cancer treatment.Methods: This cost-effectiveness analysis was based on data from a randomized phase III trial (SELECT BC). As cost-effectiveness was a secondary endpoint of the SELECT BC trial, some of the randomized patients participated in an EQ-5D survey (N = 391) and health economic survey (N = 146). The EQ-5D responses, claims, and prescription data were collected for as long as possible until death. The expected quality-adjusted life years (QALY) obtained from each treatment were calculated using patient-level EQ-5D data, and the expected cost was calculated using patient-level claim data. The analysis was performed from the perspective of public healthcare payers.Results: The estimated EQ-5D least-square means and 95% CI up to 48 months were 0.764 (95% CI, 0.741-0.782) and 0.742 (95% CI, 0.720-0.764) in the S-1 and taxane arms, respectively. The expected QALY was 2.11 for the S-1 arm and 2.04 for the taxane arm, with expected costs of JPY 5.13 million (USD 46,600) and JPY 5.56 million (USD 50,500), respectively. These results show that S-1 is cost-saving. According to probabilistic sensitivity analysis, S-1 was dominant with a probability of 63%. When the willingness to pay (WTP) value was JPY 5 million (USD 45,500) per QALY, the probability of being cost-effective was 92%.Conclusions: Our results show that the introduction of oral S-1 therapy for metastatic breast cancer is highly likely to be cost-effective.Trial Registration: UMIN CTR C000000416 . Registered on May 10, 2006. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary Oral cancer has been recognized as a tumor with low sensitivity to anticancer agents. However, introduction of S-1, an oral cancer agent is improving treatment outcome for patients with oral cancer. In addition, S-1, as a main drug for oral cancer treatment in Japan can be easily available for outpatients. In fact, S-1 exerts high therapeutic effects with acceptable side effects. Moreover, combined chemotherapy with S-1 shows higher efficacy than S-1 alone, and combined chemo-radiotherapy with S-1 exerts remarkable therapeutic effects. Furthermore, we should consider the combined therapy of S-1 and molecular targeting agents right now as these combinations were reportedly useful for oral cancer treatment. Here, we describe our findings related to S-1 that were obtained experimentally and clinically, and favorable therapeutic strategies with S-1 against oral cancer with bibliographic considerations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Non-inferiority for overall survival (OS) following alternate-day treatment with the oral anticancer drug S-1 compared with standard daily treatment was assessed in Japanese patients with unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer in a multicenter, randomized, phase II study. This trial was registered at the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (no. 000008604).Methods: Chemotherapy-naïve patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned 2:1 to treatment with alternate-day (twice daily on alternate days from days 1 through 42 of a 42-day cycle) or daily (twice daily on days 1 through 28 of a 42-day cycle) treatment with S-1. The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure, response rate, quality of life assessments, and safety.Results: A total of 190 patients were enrolled, of which 185 were included in the final analysis (alternate-day: 121; daily: 64). Median OS was 9.4 for the alternate-day group and 10.4 months for the daily group [hazard ratio (HR), 1.19; 95% credible interval, 0.86 to 1.64], indicating that non-inferiority of alternate-day treatment to daily treatment was not demonstrated. Median PFS was 3.0 for the alternate-day group and 4.2 months for the daily group (HR, 1.65; 95% credible interval, 1.20-2.29). The incidence of anorexia, fatigue, neutrophils, pigmentation, and pneumonitis was lower in alternate-day treatment compared with daily treatment.Conclusion: S-1 for advanced pancreatic cancer should be taken daily as recommended, based on the decreased OS and PFS and marginal improvement in safety observed in the alternate-day group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Combination chemotherapy with S-1 and irinotecan is one of the standard treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in Japan. However, there are few alternative practical second-line therapies. We conducted a phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of S-1 and irinotecan plus bevacizumab as a second-line treatment for oxaliplatin-refractory mCRC. Methods: Patients with mCRC who were previously treated with oxaliplatin-containing regimens were enrolled. Oral S-1 at a dose of 80 mg/m was administered twice daily for 2 weeks, followed by a 1-week drug-free interval. Irinotecan at a dose of 150 mg/m and bevacizumab at a dose of 7.5 mg/kg were administered on day 1. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Thirty-seven patients were enrolled, and 34 and 36 patients were assessed for response and safety, respectively. The overall response rate was 20.6 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 8.7-37.9), and the disease control rate was 76.5 % (95 % CI 58.8-89.3). The median PFS was 5.6 months (95 % CI 3.8-7.0). The median overall survival was 16.4 months (95 % CI 8.1-20.0). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia (25.0 %), anorexia (22.2 %), anemia (16.7 %), and fatigue/malaise (16.7 %). The most common grade 3/4 adverse event of special interest for bevacizumab was hypertension (30.6 %). One treatment-related death caused by gastrointestinal bleeding occurred. Conclusions: The findings suggest that the combination of S-1 and irinotecan plus bevacizumab is effective and tolerable as second-line chemotherapy for patients with oxaliplatin-refractory mCRC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Conclusion: It appears that patients with SCCHN should be recommended to take S-1 for more than 1 year and, if possible, more than 2 years, as adjuvant chemotherapy for SCCHN. Objectives: There is no established consensus on the duration of administration of S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Since it might be difficult to undergo prospective randomized study to identify the optimal duration of the administration period of S-1 without a standard, the authors have undergone a retrospective clinical study to decide the tentative standard of therapeutic duration of S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy for SCCHN. Methods: The clinical records of 89 patients with SCCHN who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 were investigated. Results: The median duration of S-1 administration as adjuvant chemotherapy for SCCHN was 7 months (range = 0.1–58 months). Disease-free survivals (DFSs) were generally longer when S-1 administration periods were longer. After adjusting for prognostic factors, S-1 administration periods of 24 months or longer showed significantly lower hazard ratios (HRs) than 0–12 months. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Capecitabine and S-1 are orally administered fluorinated pyrimidines with high-level activity against metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This randomized, multicenter, phase II study compared the activities and safeties of the oral fluoropyrimidines, capecitabine and S-1, in breast cancer patients. Methods: Patients with MBC were randomly assigned to receive capecitabine 825 g/m twice daily on days 1-21 every 4 weeks or S-1 40-60 mg twice daily, according to body surface area, on days 1-28 every 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: A total of 142 patients were enrolled and randomized to either capecitabine ( N = 73) or S-1 ( N = 69). Median PFS (progression-free survival) was 1.2 years for capecitabine and 1.3 years for S-1, with a hazard ratio (S-1/capecitabine) of 0.85 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.52-1.38) ( P = 0.48 by log-rank). The confirmed objective response rates were 24.0 % for capecitabine and 23.1 % for S-1 ( P = 0.938). The most common treatment-related adverse events were grade 1-2 in intensity. Thrombocytopenia (S-1: 9.2 %, capecitabine: 1.4 %; P = 0.040) and nausea (S-1: 26.2 %, capecitabine: 14.1 %; P = 0.079) were more frequent in the S-1 group, while hand-foot syndrome occurred more often in the capecitabine group (S-1: 10.8 %, capecitabine: 25.4 %; P = 0.029). Conclusions: The results of the current study demonstrate that both S-1 and capecitabine are effective and well-tolerated treatments in patients with MBC, while their adverse events were different. They are both convenient, orally administered drugs, making them attractive agents for use in outpatient treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Protracted low-dose infusion of irinotecan has been suggested to enhance antitumor activity. A phase II study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral S-1 combined with 24-hour infusion of irinotecan and intravenous bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). Methods: The subjects were 79 patients with MCRC; 57 were chemotherapy naïve. Irinotecan (125 mg/m2) was administered as a 24-hour infusion on days 1 and 15, S-1 (80 mg/m2) was administered orally on days 1-14, and bevacizumab (5.0 mg/kg) was given on days 1 and 15. The treatment was repeated every 4 weeks. Results: Median follow-up was 20.0 months, and the mean number of cycles was 7. The overall response rate was 79.7% (95% CI, 69.2-88.0), 86.0% (95% CI, 74.2-93.7) for first-line and 63.6% (95% CI, 40.7-82.8) for second-line treatment. The median progression-free survival was 16.4 months (95% CI, 13.9-21.0) for first-line and 9.4 months (95% CI, 4.9-16.5) for second-line treatment. The median overall survival was not reached. Grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (43%), leukopenia (20.3%), anorexia (19.0%), and diarrhea (10.1%). Toxicity was tolerable. Conclusions: Combination chemotherapy with oral S-1 and biweekly 24-hour infusions of irinotecan plus bevacizumab appears to be highly active and well tolerated both as first-line and second-line chemotherapy for MCRC. © 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This retrospective study aimed to address the therapeutic outcome for scirrhous gastric cancer patients by evaluating the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to gastrectomy. Methods: Two cycles of a 3-week regimen of fluoropyrimidine S-1 (40 mg/m2, orally, twice daily), together with cisplatin (60 mg/m2, intravenously, day 8), were administered to patients, separated by a 2-week rest period. Surgery was performed 3 weeks later in the neoadjuvant group (n = 27). We retrospectively evaluated overall survival and prognostic factors in these patients. Results: Univariate analysis showed that positive lavage cytology indicated significantly worse prognoses. In the 15 patients who also underwent curative gastrectomies after S-1 plus cisplatin chemotherapy, the pathological response grade was a significant prognostic factor for 5-year survival. Additionally, lymph node metastasis tended to be an adverse prognostic factor. Conclusion: After S-1 plus cisplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy, a grade 2-3 pathological response may predict favorable outcomes in scirrhous gastric cancer patients receiving curative gastrectomy, but further studies are needed to confirm these results. © 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Based on the Japan Adjuvant Study Group of Pancreatic Cancer 01 study, the standard duration of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 (an oral 5-fluorouracil prodrug consisting of tegafur, gimeracil, and oteracil) in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) was considered to be 6 months, but the impact of increasing its duration on postoperative survival was unknown. Here, the authors investigated this question by reviewing real-world data from a large cohort of patients with PDAC., Methods: In total, 3949 patients who underwent surgery for PDAC during the study period followed by S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy in board-certified institutions were included. Based on the duration of S-1 chemotherapy, two subgroups were defined: a standard-duration group that included patients who were treated for 180 ± 30 days and a longer duration group that included patients who received treatment for >210 days., Results: The median duration of S-1 chemotherapy was 167 days, with a mean ± standard deviation of 200 ± 193 days. After excluding patients who had a recurrence within 210 days after the initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy, postoperative recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in the standard-duration group (n = 1473) and the longer duration group (n = 975) were compared. RFS and OS did not differ significantly between the standard-duration and longer duration groups (5-year RFS: 37.8% vs. 36.2% respectively; p = .6186; 5-year OS: 52.8% vs. 53.4%, respectively; p = .5850). The insignificant difference was verified by multivariate analysis and propensity-score matching analysis., Conclusions: The current findings suggest that extending S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy beyond 6 months has no significant additional effect on survival in patients with PDAC. This could be useful in determining whether to extend S-1 chemotherapy in patients who have completed the standard 6-month treatment., (© 2022 American Cancer Society.)

Conclusion: Nedaplatin and S-1 treatment with concurrent radiotherapy was effective, with acceptable toxicities. This regimen does not require extensive intravenous hydration and continuous infusion. Nedaplatin and S-1 may contribute to better clinical outcomes and improve quality of life for patients. Objectives: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical efficacy and toxicity of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with nedaplatin and S-1 for head and neck squamous cell cancer. Methods: Forty-six patients with oropharyngeal, hypopharyngeal, and laryngeal cancer were treated with S-1 on days 1 through 14 and nedaplatin on day 1 every 4 weeks for two cycles of radiotherapy. Therapeutic responses and adverse events were assessed. Results: Primary site tumors and neck lymph nodes exhibited complete response rates of 91% and 64.3%, respectively. The 4-year relapse-free survival and overall survival rates were 76.2% and 85.3%, respectively. The main grade 3 and 4 toxicities were mucositis (30%), leukopenia (30%), anorexia (22%), dermatitis (15%), and thrombocytopenia (9%). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: A single-arm phase II clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with concurrent S-1, bevacizumab, and radiation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Methods: Fifty-two patients with LARC were enrolled. A total dose of 45 Gy was delivered in 25 fractions over 5 weeks, S-1 was administered orally twice a day on days 1-14 and 22-35, and bevacizumab was administered on days 1, 15, and 29. Surgical resection was scheduled 8 weeks (6-10 weeks) after completing the CRT. Results: All 52 patients underwent R0 radical surgery. Sphincter preservation was possible in 38 (73.1%) patients. A pathologic complete response was obtained in 10 (19.2%) patients, a pathologic downstaging was achieved in 37 (71.2%) patients, and the tumor shrinkage rate was 77.1%. The only grade 3 adverse events were leukopenia and rash in 1 (1.9%) patient. The rate of postoperative complications was 28.8%. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 9 (23.7%) of the 38 patients who underwent sphincter-preserving surgery. Perineal wound dehiscence developed in 2 (14.3%) of the 14 patients who received an abdominoperineal resection. Conclusions: Adding bevacizumab to S-1 clearly increased the incidence of wound-related complications, with no distinct enhancement of tumor response. © 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose We aimed to investigate the recommended dose for the combination of TSU-68, a multiple-receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 and platelet-derived growth factor receptor-β, and S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine, in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on its associated dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) frequency. We also determined the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and efficacy of the combination treatment. Patients and methods Patients without any prior systemic therapy received 400 mg/day TSU-68 orally and 80 mg/day (level 1) or 100 mg/day (level 2) S-1 for 4 or 2 weeks followed by a 2- or 1-week rest period (groups A and B, respectively). According to the treatment, patients progressed from level 1B to level 2A, then level 2B. Safety and response rates were assessed. Results Eighteen patients were enrolled. Two patients at levels 1B and 2A but none at level 2B showed DLTs. The common adverse drug reactions were a decrease in hemoglobin levels, hypoalbuminemia, and anorexia, which were mild in severity (grades 1-2). PK data from levels 1B and 2A indicated that the area under the curve for TSU-68 and 5-fluorouracil was unlikely to be affected by the combination treatment. Response rate, disease control rate, median time to progression, and median overall survival were 27.8 %, 61.1 %, 5.3 months, and 12.8 months, respectively. Conclusion The recommended dose for advanced HCC should be 400 mg/day TSU-68 and 100 mg/day S-1 for 4 weeks followed by 2-week rest. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Sorafenib is the sole molecular-targeted agent showing a survival benefit in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We evaluated the tolerability and effectiveness of a combination of S-1 with sorafenib in patients with advanced HCC. Methods S-1 was administered during days 1-14 and sorafenib was administered every day. This treatment was repeated every 21 days. In phase I, we determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). The dose of each drug was planned as follows: cohort 1: S-1 48 mg/m/day and sorafenib 400 mg/day, cohort 2a: S-1 48 mg/m/day and sorafenib 800 mg/day, cohort 2b: S-1 64 mg/m/day and sorafenib 400 mg/day, cohort 3: S-1 64 mg/m/day and sorafenib 800 mg/day, and cohort 4: S-1 80 mg/m/day and sorafenib 800 mg/day. In phase II, the patients were treated at the MTD to evaluate safety and efficacy. Results Nineteen patients were enrolled in phase I. One of the six patients in cohort 1 and one of the six patients in cohort 3 experienced DLT. None of the three patients in cohort 2a experienced DLT and three of the four patients in cohort 4 experienced DLT. Therefore, cohort 3 was considered the MTD. Subsequently, 26 patients were enrolled in phase II. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were an increase of aspartate aminotransferase (38.5 %), thrombocytopenia (23.1 %), neutropenia (19.2 %), hyperbilirubinemia (15.4 %), an increase of alanine aminotransferase (15.4 %), hyponatremia (11.5 %), rash (11.5 %), and hypophosphatemia (11.5 %). Sudden death occurred in one patient (3.8 %). A patient (3.8 %) had a partial response, 15 (57.7 %) had stable disease, and 10 (38.5 %) had progressive disease. The median times to progression and overall survival were 2.4 and 10.5 months, respectively. Conclusion The MTD of S-1 and sorafenib in patients with advanced HCC was 64 mg/m/day and 800 mg/day, respectively. This dose/regimen demonstrated substantial clinical activity among patients with advanced HCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Combined chemotherapy with S-1 and irinotecan (IRIS) for metastatic colorectal cancer has been reported to be effective and safe. However, there are only a few studies on the effects of adding bevacizumab to IRIS. We conducted a clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IRIS plus bevacizumab as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: Forty metastatic colorectal cancer patients were enrolled in this phase II study. All patients received irinotecan (80 mg/m2) and bevacizumab (7 mg/kg) on days 1 and 15 and S-1 (40-60 mg twice daily) on days 1-21 of a 5-week repeated cycle. Results: The response rate was 47.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 31.5-63.2], progression-free survival was 11.9 months (95% CI 9.4-16.8), and overall survival was 23.4 months (95% CI 19.0-inf). The only grade 3 hematological toxicity was neutropenia (16%) and the incidences of grade 3 nonhematological toxicity were low at <10%, other than diarrhea (10.9%). Conclusion: In this clinical study, we revealed IRIS plus bevacizumab to be a promising first-line regimen for metastatic colorectal cancer with a low incidence of serious toxicities, in which favorable response rates and extension of survival time can be expected. © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Carcinomas of unknown primary site (CUPs) are heterogeneous tumors associated with a poor prognosis. This phase II trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel combination chemotherapy of S-1 and cisplatin (CDDP) in patients with CUP. Patients and Methods Patients with previously untreated CUPs were eligible for this trial. The treatment schedule consisted of oral S-1 (40 mg/m) twice a day on days 1-21, and intravenous CDDP (60 mg/m) on day 8. This schedule was repeated every 5 weeks. Results A total of 46 patients were enrolled. The overall response rate and the disease control rate were 41.3 % and 80.4 %, respectively. The median overall survival time was 17.4 months. Grade 3/4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and febrile neutropenia occurred in 28.3 %, 13.0 %, and 2.2 % of the patients, respectively. Conclusion CDDP plus S-1 combination chemotherapy is well tolerated and active first-line empiric therapies for patients with CUP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The effectiveness of specific regimens of adjuvant therapy for gastric cancer has not been verified by large clinical trials. Recently, several large trials attempted to verify the effectiveness of adjuvant therapy. The Adjuvant Chemotherapy Trial of TS-1 for Gastric Cancer in Japan, a randomized controlled trial of adjuvant S-1 therapy for resected gastric cancer, demonstrated significant improvement in overall and relapse-free survival, compared to surgery alone. To evaluate value for money of S-1 therapy, cost-effective analysis was carried out.Methods: The analysis was carried out from a payer's perspective. As an economic measure, cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained was estimated. Overall survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, up to 5-year observation. Beyond this period, it was simulated by the modified Boag model. Utility score is derived from interviews with sampled patients using a time trade-off method. Costs were estimated from trial data during observation, while in the period beyond observation they were estimated using simulation results. To explore uncertainty of the results, qualitative and stochastic sensitivity analyses were done.Results: Adjuvant S-1 therapy gained 1.24 QALYs per patient and increased costs by $3,722 per patient for over lifetime (3% discount rate for both effect and costs). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (95% confidence intervals) for over lifetime was estimated to be $3,016 ($1,441, $8,840) per QALY. The sensitivity analyses showed the robustness of these results.Conclusion: Adjuvant S-1 therapy for curatively resected gastric cancer is likely cost-effective. This therapy can be accepted for wide use in Japan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: A phase II study was performed to investigate the safety and efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) combined with an orally active fluoropyrimidine, S-1, plus cisplatin for locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC). Methods: CCRT comprised 2 courses, a 30-Gy radiotherapy over 3 weeks plus daily oral S-1 (80 mg/m2/day) for 2 weeks and a 24-hour cisplatin infusion (70 mg/m2) on day 8, and an identical course administered after a 2-week break. Results: One hundred and sixteen patients, 12 with stage II, 71 with stage III, and 33 with stage IVa LAEC participated, and 106 of them (91.4%) completed the CCRT course. The most serious toxicity was myelosuppression: grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 28.4 and 9.5% of patients, respectively. Nonhematologic toxicity was moderate. Complete response rates in patients with stage II, III, and IVa LAEC were 91.7, 67.6, and 36.4%, respectively. The overall median survival time was 2.3 years and that of patients with stage II, III, and IVa cancer was 7.0, 2.6, and 1.3 years, respectively. Conclusions: CCRT combined with S-1 plus cisplatin showed promising safety and efficacy. Potentially, this combination therapy could become a baseline medication for patients with LAEC. Copyright © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: A number of clinical trials, including the FIRIS study, have shown that S-1 plus irinotecan (IRIS) is safe and effective in patients with colorectal cancer. Several different treatment protocols for IRIS are commonly used in Japan, besides the one used in the FIRIS study. This study was designed to evaluate the feasibility of a 5-week cycle of IRIS. Methods: Between January 2005 and February 2008, a total of 55 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were enrolled at nine centers in Japan. All patients received irinotecan intravenously (80 mg/m) on days 1 and 15 and S-1 orally (40-60 mg twice daily, according to body surface area) on days 1-21 of a 5-week repeated cycle. Results: The overall response rate was 29.1 %. The response rate was 43.8 % in patients who received IRIS as first-line therapy and 23.1 % in those who received IRIS as second-line or subsequent therapy. The median survival time was 678 days (22.6 months). Adverse events of Grade 3 or higher that occurred at an incidence of ≥10 % were neutropenia (12.7 %) and diarrhea (10.9 %). Conclusion: Our efficacy and safety data suggest that a 5-week cycle of IRIS is an effective alternative to used currently regimens. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: S-1 is widely used for various cancers. It may be useful for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC); however, there are insufficient data. The purpose is to provide results of an analysis of S-1 monotherapy for unresectable and recurrent ESCC. Patients and Methods: Twenty patients with histologically proven ESCC who were previously treated with other chemo(radio)therapies were treated with S-1 alone as second- or third-line chemotherapy. Results: A complete response (CR) was observed in 1 case (5%). A partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD) were seen in 4 (20.0%), 7 (35.0%), and 8 (40.0%) cases, respectively. Two cases (10%) of anemia, 1 case (5%) of leukopenia, 3 cases (15%) of fatigue, and 3 cases (15%) of diarrhea were observed as grade 3 toxicity; however, there were no cases of grade 4 toxicity. The 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 10.0%, and the median PFS was 100 days. The 1-year overall survival (OS) was 30.5%, and the median OS was 330 days. The 1-year PFS rate in CR/PR/SD and PD was 16.7 and 0%, and the median survival time was 120 and 40 days. Conclusion: S-1 is a promising new drug which can be used as a second- or third-line chemotherapy for ESCC. Copyright © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: This multicenter phase II study determined the efficacy and safety of new daily oral S-1 and weekly irinotecan (CPT-11) combination schedule in patients with previously untreated advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer. Patients and methods: Patients received first-line chemotherapy comprising S-1 80 mg/m2/day given on days 3 to 7, 10 to 14, and 17 to 21 and 60 mg/m2 CPT-11 administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Results: A total of 45 eligible patients were enrolled in this study. The overall response rate was 48.9%. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival was 8.1 months and 20.9 months, respectively. The rates of grade 3 or 4 toxicity were as follows: neutropenia, 8.9%; anemia, 4.4%; anorexia, 6.7%; and diarrhea, 6.7%. Conclusions: This new S-1 and irinotecan combination schedule appeared to be an effective, well-tolerated, and convenient regimen in patients with advanced colorectal cancer as compared with conventional regimens such as FOLFIRI and IRIS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We present the first case report of the use of sorafenib and S-1 for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) producing granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). This entity is clinically rare and has a poor outcome. A 78-year-old Japanese man presented with macrohematuria, left flank pain, and a palpable mass. Laboratory data showed marked leukocytosis with increased serum and urinary G-CSF. The histopathological diagnosis was unclassified RCC. New combination therapy with sorafenib and S-1 exerted a therapeutic effect and apparently decreased serum and urinary G-CSF levels, although the patient died of gastrointestinal perforation. The use of combined sorafenib and S-1 may be worthy of consideration in the treatment of RCC producing G-CSF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of an alternating regimen of S-1 plus low-dose cisplatin and S-1 alone as adjuvant therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer.Patients and Methods: The study group comprised 100 patients with stage IIIA, stage IIIB, or stage IV. Patients postoperatively received three 5-week cycles of chemotherapy. In the first cycle, S-1 (80 mg/m(2)) was given daily for 3 weeks, followed by 2 weeks of rest, and low-dose cisplatin (10 mg) was given on days 1 to 5 and 8 to 12. In the second and third 5-week cycles, S-1 alone was given. The primary endpoints were median survival time, and survival at 1 and 3 years. Secondary endpoints were safety and overall response rates.Results: Median survival time was 18 months in stage IV and 32 months in stage IIIB. The rates of survival at 1 and 3 years were 68.7% and 30.6% in stage IV, 100% and 68.4% in stage IIIA, and 100% and 46.6% in stage IIIB, respectively. Adverse events of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 14% of the patients. The overall response rate of target lesions was 54%.Conclusion: Our regimen is effective and safe for adjuvant therapy in patients with curatively resected stage III gastric cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: As S-1 monotherapy has recently become the standard adjuvant regimen for stage II-III gastric cancer patients after curative gastrectomy in Japan, the question whether adjuvant S-1 affects the subsequent clinical course of relapsed patients has attracted great concern. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the effect of adjuvant S-1 on survival following recurrence and efficacy of first-line treatment in patients with recurrent gastric cancer after curative gastrectomy. A total of 89 patients were evaluated. Thirty patients received adjuvant S-1 (cohort A), 10 patients were given adjuvant chemotherapy with other oral 5-FU agents (cohort B) and 49 patients received no adjuvant chemotherapy (cohort C). Results: Median survival time following recurrence was 287 days in cohort A, 451 days in B and 547 days in C, with a significant difference between A and C (p = 0.0034). Response rates of the first-line chemotherapy after recurrence were 6.7, 30.0 and 42.9% in cohorts A, B and C, respectively, with a significant difference between A and C (p = 0.0007). On multivariate analysis, S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy was independently associated with poor prognosis after recurrence (hazard ratio 2.64). Conclusion: S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy significantly reduced survival and response to first-line chemotherapy following recurrence in patients with recurrent gastric cancer. Copyright © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: S-1, an oral anticancer agent, contains tegafur (FT), 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (CDHP), and potassium oxonate (Oxo) at a molar ratio of FT:CDHP:Oxo = 1:0.4:1. The aim of this trial was to investigate the efficacy and safety of S-1 in Japanese patients with cytokine-refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Methods: We conducted a non-randomized, open-label trial in Japanese patients with metastatic RCC who had received nephrectomy and had failed cytokine-based immunotherapy. The primary endpoint was response rate. S-1 40-60 mg based on the body surface area was administered twice daily (80-120 mg/day) for 4 consecutive weeks, followed by a 2-week rest period; cycles were repeated every 6 weeks. Patients continued treatment until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Results: A total of 20 eligible patients were enrolled. Among these, 3 patients had partial response, yielding objective response rate of 15%; 13 patients had no change; 4 patients had progressive disease. The median time-to-progression and median overall survival were 12.0 and 25.7 months, respectively. The initial adverse event was generally mild to moderate in severity. The most common grade 3/4 drug-related hematological and non-hematological adverse events were neutropenia (20.0%) and anorexia (20.0%), respectively. Conclusions: S-1 is active and well tolerated for the treatment of cytokine-refractory metastatic RCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine derivative, in Japanese patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). The primary endpoint was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response. Methods: In this open-label phase II study, S-1 was started at a dose of 80, 100 or 120 mg daily based on body surface area (BSA) for 28 days, followed by 14 days of rest. Patients with histological proof of prostate cancer refractory to hormonal therapies were eligible. Patients who received prior chemotherapy were excluded. All patients provided written informed consent. To observe 20% confirmed PSA response, 33 assessable patients were needed. Treatment was continued until disease progression or the development of intolerable toxicity. Results: A total of 35 eligible patients were enrolled. The median number of treatment cycles was 3. PSA response was observed in 8 patients (22.9%, 90% CI 11.9-37.5), including 3 in which (8.6%) the PSA level normalized. The median overall survival was 25.4 months. The most common treatment-related grade 3 toxicity was anorexia (14.3%). There was no death during the study. Conclusion: S-1 monotherapy is active against castration-resistant prostate cancer and has acceptable toxicity. Copyright © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To evaluate the comprehensive safety profile of S-1, a promising novel oral fluoropyrimidine derivative, based on large cohort data. Study subjects were identified from a prospective registry of 3,758 advanced gastric cancer patients in Japan. Each patient was treated with an identical regimen of S-1 monotherapy (40 mg b.i.d. on days 1–28, every 6 weeks) and assessed for all adverse events. The median duration of treatment was 88 days; 1,605 (43%) patients underwent three or more treatment cycles. The relative dose intensity was 0.87 in the first two cycles (short-term treatment period) and 0.89 thereafter (long-term treatment period). Neutropenia was the most common severe (grade 3–4) hematological event (6.3% in the short-term period and 5.3% in the long-term period). Other hematological or key gastrointestinal events (diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, and stomatitis) had a low incidence of severe cases throughout the whole administration period (0.3–3.8%). The time to onset of severe events did not differ between patients with mild renal impairment (creatinine clearance, 50–79 ml/min) and those with normal renal function (≥80 ml/min) (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.87–1.23; P = 0.691). S-1 had manageable severe toxicity and allowed good compliance regardless of treatment duration. Prolonged administration of the drug was sustainable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Myelosuppression that occurs during chemotherapy has been reported to be a predictor of better survival in patients with breast or lung carcinomas. We evaluated the prognostic implications of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in advanced gastric carcinoma. Data from a prospective survey of oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 for advanced gastric cancer patients in Japan were reviewed. We identified 1055 untreated patients with adequate baseline bone marrow function. During treatment with S-1, a total of 293 (28%) patients experienced grade 1 or higher neutropenia. The adjusted hazard ratio of death for the presence of neutropenia, as compared with the absence of such toxicity, from a multivariate Cox model was 0.72 (95% confidence interval, 0.54–0.95; P=0.0189) for grade 1 neutropenia, 0.63 (0.50–0.78; P<0.0001) for grade 2 neutropenia and 0.71 (0.51–0.98; P=0.0388) for grade 3–4 neutropenia. These findings suggest that the occurrence of neutropenia during chemotherapy is an independent predictor of increased survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer, whereas the absence of such toxicity indicates that the dosages of drugs are not pharmacologically adequate. Monitoring of neutropenia in patients who receive chemotherapy may contribute to improved drug efficacy and favourable survival.British Journal of Cancer (2007) 97, 37–42. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6603831 www.bjcancer.com Published online 5 June 2007 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]