Search

Background: The curative criteria after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric carcinoma were updated by the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. No study has shown promising results with endoscopic submucosal dissection for early adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction based on the new curative criteria. The purpose of this study was to validate clinical efficacy of the application of the curative criteria of the 5th edition Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines for early adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Methods: Patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma between January 2013 and June 2018 were eligible for this study. Clinical and pathological features and treatment outcomes were retrospectively reviewed using medical records. Results: The success rate for en-bloc resection was 97.2% (172/177) and the curative resection rate was 71.2% (126/177). Additional endoscopic submucosal dissection or radical surgery was conducted in 10 patients (5.6%) who did not fulfil the curative resection criteria, while one patient with curative resection remedied with endoscopic submucosal dissection because of recurrence. According to eCura scoring system, 94 patients (53.1%) were categorized into eCura A, 34 patients (19.2%) into eCura B, 11 patients (6.2%) into eCura C-1, and 38 patients (21.5%) into eCura C-2. Five patients categorized as eCura C-2 underwent radical surgery, two of whom have lymph node metastasis. Conclusions: Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction that met the expanded criteria of the 5th edition Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines were acceptable and should be the standard treatment instead of surgical resection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The aim of this multicenter study was to clarify the influence of timing of relapse after curative resection for colorectal cancer on prognosis. Methods: We enrolled 5,230 consecutive patients who underwent curative resection for colorectal cancer at 14 hospitals from 1991 to 1996. All patients were intensively followed up. Time to relapse (TR) was classified into three groups as follows: group A, TR ≤1 year; group B, TR >1 year and ≤3 years, and group C, TR >3 years. The prognoses after relapse were compared among the three groups. Results: Of the 5,230 patients, 906 experienced relapse (17.3%). The curative resection rates for recurrent tumors were 35.2% in group A, 46.6% in group B, and 45.1% in group C (p = 0.0045). There were significant differences in the prognoses after relapse among the three TR groups in patients with relapse to the liver (p = 0.0175) and in those with local relapses (p = 0.0021), but not in those with pulmonary or anastomotic recurrence. There were no differences in prognoses after relapse in any recurrence site among the three groups in patients who underwent curative resection for relapse. Conclusion: If patients can undergo curative resection for relapse, they receive a survival benefit regardless of the timing of relapse. Copyright © 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Surveillance after curative surgery for gastric cancer is conventionally performed for 5 years. However, the appropriate follow-up period remains controversial., Methods: This study retrospectively compiled a clinicopathological database of patients who underwent curative gastrectomy between 1975 and 2010 at Toranomon Hospital and were reviewed until March 2020. Analyzing the follow-up rate and recurrence rate for each stage in each postoperative year, we set each follow-up endpoint when the subsequent recurrence rate fell below 1%., Results: A total of 5235 patients were eligible for inclusion in the study. The rate of patients followed up for 5 years was 90.3%. The rates of follow-up were 52.7% at 10 years, 38.3% at 15 years, and 10.3% at 20 years. Recurrence was confirmed in 850 patients in total (16.2%) and in 50 patients beyond 5 years. The adequate follow-up endpoints according to stage (with < 1% recurrence risk) were 2 years for stage IA, 4 years for IB, 6 years for IIA, 9 years for IIB, 7 years for IIIA, and 8 years for IV (curative). For stage IIIB and IIIC, the recurrence risk remained., Conclusions: The adequate surveillance duration of resected gastric cancer might be different in each stage. Although the follow-up duration for stage I disease could be reduced to less than 5 years, advanced gastric cancer such as stage III or IV disease has risk of recurrence beyond 5 years and therefore additional follow-up is required. These results could help decide the strategy for surveillance.

Background: The curative criteria after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric carcinoma were updated by the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. No study has shown promising results with endoscopic submucosal dissection for early adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction based on the new curative criteria. The purpose of this study was to validate clinical efficacy of the application of the curative criteria of the 5th edition Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines for early adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction after endoscopic submucosal dissection., Methods: Patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma between January 2013 and June 2018 were eligible for this study. Clinical and pathological features and treatment outcomes were retrospectively reviewed using medical records., Results: The success rate for en-bloc resection was 97.2% (172/177) and the curative resection rate was 71.2% (126/177). Additional endoscopic submucosal dissection or radical surgery was conducted in 10 patients (5.6%) who did not fulfil the curative resection criteria, while one patient with curative resection remedied with endoscopic submucosal dissection because of recurrence. According to eCura scoring system, 94 patients (53.1%) were categorized into eCura A, 34 patients (19.2%) into eCura B, 11 patients (6.2%) into eCura C-1, and 38 patients (21.5%) into eCura C-2. Five patients categorized as eCura C-2 underwent radical surgery, two of whom have lymph node metastasis., Conclusions: Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction that met the expanded criteria of the 5th edition Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines were acceptable and should be the standard treatment instead of surgical resection., Competing Interests: None

Background and Aim: There are a number of published reports on long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC), but most reports are from single centers with median follow-up periods shorter than 5 years. This questionnaire study investigated long-term outcomes of curative ESD for EGC at six Japanese institutions with follow-up rates of at least 90% over a minimum 5-year period., Methods: All consecutive patients with initial-onset EGC who underwent ESD through December 2006 at the six institutions were included in our study. The questionnaire covered pathological curability and long-term outcomes of patients with curative resections or curative resections for expanded indications over follow-up periods of at least 5 years., Results: There were 3788 patients with initial-onset EGC including 1710 (45.1%) patients with curative resections and 1289 (34.0%) patients with curative resections for expanded indications. The remaining 789 (20.8%) patients had non-curativeresections. Altogether, 1601 (93.6%) patients with curative resections and 1205 (93.5%) patients with curative resections for expanded indications were successfully followed up for at least 5 years. No recurrences were reported in any of the 1601 patients with curative resections whereas three recurrences (0.2%) were reported in the 1205 patients with curative resections for expanded indications. Gastric cancer-related deaths occurred in seven (0.2%) of the 2806 patients with curative resections or curative resections for expanded indications including six patients with metachronous gastric cancer-related deaths., Conclusion: This questionnaire study's results indicated favorable long-term outcomes for patients with curative resections or curative resections for expanded indications., (© 2013 The Authors. Digestive Endoscopy © 2013 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.)