1. Best practices for clinical pathology testing in carcinogenicity studies.
- Author
-
Young JK, Hall RL, O'Brien P, Strauss V, and Vahle JL
- Subjects
- Animals, Benchmarking, Carcinogenicity Tests, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions, Europe, Guidelines as Topic, Humans, Japan, Mice, Mice, Transgenic, North America, Neoplasms pathology, Pathology, Clinical standards
- Abstract
The Society of Toxicologic Pathology (STP) and American Society for Veterinary Clinical Pathology (ASCVP) convened a Clinical Pathology in Carcinogenicity Studies Working Group to recommend best practices for inclusion of clinical pathology testing in carcinogenicity studies. Regulatory guidance documents and literature were reviewed, and veterinary pathologists from North America, Japan, and Europe were surveyed regarding current practices, perceived value, and recommendations for clinical pathology testing in carcinogenicity studies. For two-year rodent carcinogenicity studies, the Working Group recommends that clinical pathology testing be limited to collection of blood smears at scheduled and unscheduled sacrifices to be examined only if indicated to aid in the diagnosis of possible hematopoietic neoplasia following histopathologic evaluation. Additional clinical pathology testing is most appropriately used to address specific issues from prior toxicity studies or known test article-related class effects. Inadequate data were available to make a recommendation concerning clinical pathology testing for alternative six-month carcinogenicity assays using genetically modified mice, although the Working Group suggests that it may be appropriate to use the same approach as for two-year carcinogenicity studies since the study goal is the same.
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF