Search

Background: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a neuromuscular disease caused by homozygous deletion of SMN1 exons 7 and 8. However, exon 8 is retained in some cases, where SMN2 exon 7 recombines with SMN1 exon 8, forming a hybrid SMN gene. It remains unknown how the hybrid SMN gene contribute to the SMA phenotype., Method: We analyzed 515 patients with clinical suspicion for SMA. SMN1 exons 7 and 8 deletion was detected by PCR followed by enzyme digestion. Hybrid SMN genes were further analyzed by nucleotide sequencing. SMN2 copy number was determined by real-time PCR., Results: SMN1 exon 7 was deleted in 228 out of 515 patients, and SMN1 exon 8 was also deleted in 204 out of the 228 patients. The remaining 24 patients were judged to carry a hybrid SMN gene. In the patients with SMN1 exon 7 deletion, the frequency of the severe phenotype was significantly lower in the patients with hybrid SMN gene than in the patients without hybrid SMN gene. However, as for the distribution of SMN2 exon 7 copy number among the clinical phenotypes, there was no significant difference between both groups of SMA patients with or without hybrid SMN gene., Conclusion: Hybrid SMN genes are not rare in Japanese SMA patients, and it appears to be associated with a less severe phenotype. The phenotype of patients with hybrid SMN gene was determined by the copy number of SMN2 exon 7, as similarly for the patients without hybrid SMN gene., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2020 The Japanese Society of Child Neurology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis using DNA from dried blood spot (DBS) samples on filter paper is a critical technique for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) newborn screening. However, DNA extraction from DBS is time-consuming, and elimination of PCR inhibitors from DBS is almost impossible., Methods: Exon 7 of the two homologous SMA-related genes, survival motor neuron (SMN) 1 and SMN2, of five SMA patients and five controls were amplified by PCR with a punched-out circle of the DBS paper. Two types of DNA preparation methods were tested; DNA-extraction (extracted DNA was added in a PCR tube) and non-DNA-extraction (a punched-out DBS circle was placed in a PCR tube). As for the DNA polymerases, two different enzymes were compared; TaKaRa Ex Taq™ and KOD FX Neo™. To test the diagnostic quality of PCR products, RFLP (Restriction fragment length polymorphism) analysis with DraI digestion was performed, differentiating SMN1 and SMN2., Results: In PCR using extracted DNA, sufficient amplification was achieved with TaKaRa Ex Taq™ and KOD FX Neo™, and there was no significant difference in amplification efficiency between them. In direct PCR with a punched-out DBS circle, sufficient amplification was achieved when KOD FX Neo™ polymerase was used, while there was no amplification with TaKaRa Ex Taq™. RFLP analysis of the direct PCR products with KOD FX Neo™ clearly separated SMN1 and SMN2 sequences and proved the presence of both of SMN1 and SMN2 in controls, and only SMN2 in SMA patients, suggesting that the direct PCR products with KOD FX Neo™ were of sufficient diagnostic quality for SMA testing., Conclusion: Direct PCR with DNA polymerases like KOD FX NeoTM has potential to be widely used in SMA newborn screening in the near future as it obviates the DNA extraction process from DBS and can precisely amplify the target sequences in spite of the presence of PCR inhibitors.

Background: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a neuromuscular disease caused by a mutation in SMN1. SMA is classified into three subtypes (types 1, 2, 3) based on achieved motor milestones. Although NAIP and SMN2 are widely accepted as SMA-modifying factors, gender-related modifying factors or gender effects on the clinical phenotype are still controversial., Methods: A total of 122 Japanese patients with SMA, of which SMN1 was homozygously deleted, were analyzed from the perspective of the achieved motor milestone, NAIP status and SMN2 copy number., Results: A predominance of male patients was observed in SMA type 3 (the walker group) without NAIP-deletion or with high SMN2 copy number (3 or 4 copies)., Conclusion: We suggest the presence of gender-related modifiers on disease severity in SMA patients. The modifiers may contribute only in the presence of NAIP and a high copy number of SMN2.

Background: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an autosomal recessive neuromuscular disorder caused by deletion or intragenic mutation of SMN1. SMA is classified into several subtypes based on clinical severity. It has been reported that the copy number of SMN2, a highly homologous gene to SMN1, is associated with clinical severity among SMA patients with homozygous deletion of SMN1. The purpose of this study was to clarify the genotype-phenotype relationship among the patients without homozygous deletion of SMN1., Methods: We performed molecular genetic analyses of SMN1 and SMN2 in 112 Japanese patients diagnosed as having SMA based on the clinical findings. For the patients retaining SMN1, the PCR or RT-PCR products of SMN1 were sequenced to identify the mutation., Results: Out of the 112 patients, 106 patients were homozygous for deletion of SMN1, and six patients were compound heterozygous for deletion of one SMN1 allele and intragenic mutation in the retained SMN1 allele. Four intragenic mutations were identified in the six patients: p.Ala2Val, p.Trp92Ser, p.Thr274TyrfsX32 and p.Tyr277Cys. To the best of our knowledge, all mutations except p.Trp92Ser were novel mutations which had never been previously reported. According to our observation, clinical severity of the six patients was determined by the type and location of the mutation rather than SMN2 copy number., Conclusion: SMN2 copy number is not always associated with clinical severity of SMA patients, especially SMA patients retaining one SMN1 allele., (Copyright © 2013 The Japanese Society of Child Neurology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)