Search

Purpose: T1 pelvic angle (TPA) and global tilt (GT) are spinopelvic parameters that account for trunk anteversion and pelvic retroversion. To investigate spinopelvic parameters, especially TPA and GT, in Japanese adults and determine norms for each parameter related to health-related quality of life (HRQOL).Materials and Methods: Six hundred and fifty-six volunteers (262 men and 394 women) aged 50-92 years (mean, 72.8 years) were enrolled in this study. The incidence of vertebral fracture, spondylolisthesis and coronal malalignment were measured. Five spinopelvic parameters (TPA, GT, sagittal vertical axis [SVA], pelvic tilt [PT], and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis [PI-LL]) were measured using whole spine standing radiographs. The mean values for each parameter were estimated by sex and decade of life. HRQOL measures, including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and EuroQuol-5D (EQ-5D), were also obtained. Pearson's correlation coefficients were determined between each parameter and HRQOL measure. Moreover, the factors contributing to the QOL score were calculated using logistic regression with age, sex, the existence of vertebral fracture and spondylolisthesis, coronal malalignment (coronal curve >30°) and sagittal malalignment (SVA >95 mm) as explanatory variables and the presence of disability (ODI >40) as a free variable.Results: The mean values for the spinopelvic parameters were as follows: TPA, 17.9°; GT, 23.2°; SVA, 50.2 mm; PT, 18.6°; and PI-LL, 7.5°. TPA and GT strongly correlated with each other (r = 0.990) and with the other spinopelvic parameters. TPA and GT correlated with ODI (r = 0.339, r = 0.348, respectively) and EQ-5D (r = -0.285, r = -0.288, respectively), similar to those for SVA. TPA, GT, PT, and PI-LL were significantly higher in women than in men. PT and PI-LL gradually increased with age, while TPA, GT, and SVA tended to deteriorate after the 7th decade. Based on a logistic regression analysis, the deterioration of ODI was mostly affected by the sagittal malalignment. The TPA and GT cut-off values for severe disability (ODI >40) based on linear regression modeling were 26.0° and 33.7°, respectively.Conclusions: We determined reference values for spinopelvic parameters in elderly volunteers. Similar to SVA, TPA and GT correlated with HRQOL. TPA, GT, PT, and PI-LL were worse in women and progressed with age. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The Scoliosis Research Society-22r (SRS-22r) has been shown to be reliable, valid and responsive to change in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) undergoing surgery. The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) quantifies a threshold value of improvement that is clinically relevant to the patient. Health-related quality of life scores depend on age. The purpose of this study was to assess MCID threshold values stratified by age for SRS-22r domains in patients with ASD undergoing surgical correction.Methods: We identified a consecutive series of 184 Japanese ASD patients who completed the SRS-22r and Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. Effectiveness as measured on the JOABPEQ was used as the anchor to determine MCID for the Function, Pain, and Mental health domains using receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. We performed MCID analysis stratified by age (<70 or ≥70).Results: Mean preoperative SRS-22r Function score was 2.69 improving to 3.23 at postoperatively (p < 0.001). Mean preoperative SRS-22r Pain score was 3.04 improving to 3.78 at postoperatively (p < 0.001). Mean preoperative SRS-22r Mental health score was 2.72 improving to 3.25 at postoperatively (p < 0.001). There was a statistically difference in change in domain score between "not effective" and "effective" (p < 0.001). The ROC curve analysis methods yielded MCID values of 0.58 for Function, 0.55 for Pain, and 0.70 for Mental health domains. There was difference of MCID value for Function and Mental health domain between aged <70 and ≥70; 0.78 and 0.55 for Function; 0.70 and 0.48 for Mental health.Conclusion: Results of this study showed that MCID threshold values for SRS-22 Function and Mental health domains in older than 70 was lower than in younger than 70, potentially implying that older patients have lower expectation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This prospective multicenter study, established by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare and involving 27 institutions, aimed to compare postoperative outcomes between laminoplasty (LM) and posterior fusion (PF) for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), in order to address the controversy surrounding the role of instrumented fusion in cases of posterior surgical decompression for OPLL. 478 patients were considered for participation in the study; from among them, 189 (137 and 52 patients with LM and PF, respectively) were included and evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, the JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ), and radiographical measurements. Basic demographic and radiographical data were reviewed, and the propensity to choose a surgical procedure was calculated. Preoperatively, there were no significant differences among the participants in terms of patient backgrounds, radiographical measurements (K-line or cervical alignment on X-ray, OPLL occupation ratio on computed tomography, increased signal intensity change on magnetic resonance imaging), or clinical status (JOA score and JOACMEQ) after adjustments. The overall risk of perioperative complications was found to be lower with LM (odds ratio [OR] 0.40, p = 0.006), and the rate of C5 palsy occurrence was significantly lower with LM (OR 0.11, p = 0.0002) than with PF. The range of motion (20.91° ± 1.05° and 9.38° ± 1.24°, p < 0.0001) in patients who had PF was significantly smaller than in those who had LM. However, multivariable logistic regression analysis showed no significant difference among the participants in JOA score, JOA recovery rate, or JOACMEQ improvement at two years. In contrast, OPLL progression was greater in the LM group than in the PF group (OR 2.73, p = 0.0002). Both LM and PF for cervical myelopathy due to OPLL had resulted in comparable postoperative outcomes at 2 years after surgery., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Study Design: Longitudinal cohort., Objective: To calculate the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) threshold values for the Scoliosis Research Society-22R (SRS-22R) in Japanese patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) and to compare the results with previously reported values in a North American population., Summary of Background Data: The SRS-22R has been shown to be reliable, valid, and responsive to change in patients with ASD undergoing surgery. The MCID quantifies a threshold value of improvement that is clinically relevant to the patient. We hypothesize that MCID threshold values of SRS-22R differ between different cultural groups., Methods: We identified ASD patients who completed the SRS-22R preoperatively and the SRS-30 at minimum two years after surgery. Answers to the last seven questions of the SRS-30 were used as anchors to determine the MCID for the SRS-22R Activity, Pain, Appearance, Mental domains, and Total score using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis., Results: A total of 122 (16 male, 106 female) patients were included in the analysis. There was a statistically significant improvement in all domain scores from preoperation to two years postoperation. There was a statistically significant difference in change in domain score among the responses to the anchors (p < .05). The ROC curve analysis yielded MCID values of 0.90 for Activity (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.766), 0.85 for Pain (AUC = 0.637), 1.05 for Appearance (AUC = 0.764), and 0.70 for Mental (AUC = 0.641) domain, 1.05 for Total score (AUC = 0.670). Except for Appearance, these MCID thresholds were higher compared with values reported in patients from North America (Activity = 0.60, Pain = 0.40, Appearance = 1.23, Total = 0.71)., Conclusions: Results of this study showed that cultural variations exist for MCID threshold values for SRS-22 Activity, Pain, Mental domains, and Total score after surgical treatment of ASD., (Copyright © 2018 Scoliosis Research Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is generally used for neutropaenia. Previous experimental studies revealed that G-CSF promoted neurological recovery after spinal cord injury (SCI). Next, we moved to early phase of clinical trials. In a phase I/IIa trial, no adverse events were observed. Next, we conducted a non-randomised, non-blinded, comparative trial, which suggested the efficacy of G-CSF for promoting neurological recovery. Based on those results, we are now performing a phase III trial., Methods and Analysis: The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of G-CSF for acute SCI. The study design is a prospective, multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled comparative study. The current trial includes cervical SCI (severity of American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale B/C) within 48 hours after injury. Patients are randomly assigned to G-CSF and placebo groups. The G-CSF group is administered 400 µg/m 2 /day×5 days of G-CSF in normal saline via intravenous infusion for 5 consecutive days. The placebo group is similarly administered a placebo. Our primary endpoint is changes in ASIA motor scores from baseline to 3 months. Each group includes 44 patients (88 total patients)., Ethics and Dissemination: The study will be conducted according to the principles of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki and in accordance with the Japanese Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act and other guidelines, regulations and Acts. Results of the clinical study will be submitted to the head of the respective clinical study site as a report after conclusion of the clinical study by the sponsor-investigator. Even if the results are not favourable despite conducting the clinical study properly, the data will be published as a paper., Trial Registration Number: UMIN000018752., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.)

Object: The purpose of this study is to analyze the data in terms of the number of channels employed to examine the usefulness of multi-channels in intraoperative spinal cord monitoring., Methods: The prerequisites for inclusion in the baseline data were as follows: (1) cases in which only CMAP monitoring was conducted; (2) cases in which monitoring was conducted under the same stimulation condition and the recording condition. Cases where inhalation anesthesia was used or muscle relaxants were used as maintenance anesthesia was excluded from the baseline data. Of the 6,887 cases, 884 cases met the criteria. The items examined for each of the different numbers of channels were the sensitivity and specificity, the false positive rate, the false negative rate, and the coverage rate of postoperative motor deficit muscles., Result: To examine these two items in terms of the number of channels, the 4-channel group had lower sensitivity and specificity scores compared with the 8- and 16-channel groups (4 channels 73/93 %, 8 channels 100/97 %, 16 channels 100/95 %). Only four channels were derived for these cases and the coverage of postoperative motor deficit muscles was 38 % with only 30 out of the 80 postoperative motor deficit muscles in total being monitored. In the 8-channel group, it was 60 % with 12 of the 20 postoperative motor deficit muscles being monitored. The 16-channel group had 100 % coverage rate of postoperative motor deficit muscles., Conclusion: We suggest that multi-channel monitoring of at least eight channels is desirable for intraoperative spinal cord monitoring.