1. Characteristics of patients with longer treatment period of lenvatinib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A post-hoc analysis of post-marketing surveillance study in Japan.
- Author
-
Yamashita T, Suzuki N, Motoyoshi K, Zhu W, and Furuse J
- Subjects
- Humans, Japan, Prospective Studies, Product Surveillance, Postmarketing, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular pathology, Liver Neoplasms pathology, Antineoplastic Agents adverse effects, Phenylurea Compounds, Quinolines
- Abstract
Patient profiles suitable for long-term lenvatinib treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) are yet to be fully understood. This post-hoc analysis aimed to identify such patient characteristics and explore the impact of treatment duration and relative dose intensity (RDI) on treatment outcomes. The data were obtained from 703 patients in a multicenter, prospective cohort study in Japan. Lenvatinib-naïve patients with uHCC were enrolled between July 2018 and January 2019 and were followed up for 12 months. Moreover, patients were dichotomized using the median treatment duration into the longer- (≥177 days; n = 352) or shorter-treatment (<177 days; n = 351) groups. The longer-treatment group often had better performance status, lower Child-Pugh score and better modified albumin-bilirubin grade than the shorter treatment group (p<0.05 for all). The objective response rate (47.6% vs. 28.2%; p<0.001) and disease control rate (92.4% vs. 60.2%; p<0.001) were both significantly higher in the longer-treatment groups than in the shorter-treatment groups. The proportion of patients with any adverse drug reactions was generally similar between the two treatment groups. Within the longer-treatment group, the disease control rate was high regardless of dose modification (i.e., RDI <100% vs. ≥100% during the initial 177 days) (91.2% vs. 98.0%). In conclusion, patients with longer treatment tended to have better overall conditions. Lenvatinib dose modifications at the physician's discretion, considering the balance between effectiveness and safety, may contribute to the long-term treatment., Competing Interests: I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Tatsuya Yamashita has received travel grants and honoraria for speaking or participation at meetings from Chugai Pharma, Eli Lilly Japan, and Eisai. Natsumi Suzuki, Katsuaki Motoyoshi, and Wanjun Zhu are employees of Eisai Co., Ltd. Junji Furuse received research grants from Astellas, Astra Zeneca, Incyte Biosciences Japan, Eisai, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, Sanofi, J-Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo, Sumitomo Dainippon, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda, Delta-Fly-Pharma, Chugai Pharma. He has received travel grants and honoraria for speaking or participation at meetings from Ono Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharma, Incyte Biosciences Japan, Eisai, Eli Lilly Japan, Astra Zeneca, Yakult Honsha, Servier Japan, MSD, Novartis Pharma, Takeda, Bayer, Taiho Pharmaceutical, EA Pharma, Teijin pharma, Daiichi Sankyo, Terumo, Fuji film, Astellas, Onco Therapy Science, Delta-Fly-Pharma, Merck Bio, Incyte Biosciences Japan, J-Pharma. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials., (Copyright: © 2024 Yamashita et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF