Search

Studies investigating the safety of IgPro10 (Privigen ® , CSL Behring, King of Prussia, PA, USA) in Japanese patients with primary immunodeficiency (PID) are lacking. This study evaluated safety and tolerability of IgPro10 in Japanese patients with PID. In this prospective, open-label, single-arm, registrational study for Japan, IgPro10 was administered intravenously at pre-study doses of 138-556 mg/kg body weight per 3-/4-weekly dosing cycle for up to 4 months. Frequency and intensity of adverse events (AEs), their relationship to IgPro10 and AE rate per infusion (AERI) were evaluated. Of 11 enrolled patients, 10 completed the study. The median (range) total duration of exposure was 16.14 (4.1-16.3) weeks. Eight patients reported 19 AEs, none severe (based on maximum severity), giving an AERI of 0.442. One AE was deemed related to IgPro10 treatment. Three patients experienced temporally associated AEs. No serious AEs or deaths were reported. Nine patients (90%) who completed the study tolerated flow rates of ≥ 8 mg/kg/min; 5 tolerated 12 mg/kg/min (7.2 mL/kg/h), translating into a threefold decrease in mean infusion time. IgPro10 was well tolerated at a flow rate of up to 12 mg/kg/min. Safety and tolerability findings were consistent with previously reported studies in non-Japanese patients with PID.

Objective: Assessing retention rate and risk factor for drug discontinuation is important for drug evaluation. We examined a 3-year retention rate and the risk factor for discontinuation due to insufficient efficacy (IE) and adverse events (AE) in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are receiving etanercept (ETN)., Methods: Data were collected from 588 patients treated with ETN as a first biologic from the Tsurumai Biologics Communication Registry. Baseline characteristics for the incidence of both IE and AE were analyzed using the Cox proportional-hazards regression model. Patients were divided into groups based on age and concomitant methotrexate (MTX). Drug retention rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared among groups using the log-rank test., Results: ETN monotherapy without concomitant MTX [MTX(-)] was significantly related to a higher incidence of discontinuation due to IE [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.226, 95% CI 1.363-3.634]. Older age and MTX(-) were significantly related to a higher incidence of discontinuation due to AE [HR = 1.040, 1.746, 95% CI 1.020-1.060, 1.103-2.763, respectively]. The MTX(-)/≥ 65 years group had the lowest retention rate (p < 0.001). The discontinuation rate due to IE was lower in the MTX(+)/< 65 years group compared to < 65 years/MTX(-), ≥ 65 years/MTX(-) group (p = 0.006, p < 0.001, respectively). The discontinuation rate due to AE was highest in the MTX(-)/≥ 65 years group (p < 0.001)., Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the risk of discontinuation due to IE was high in the patients who did not use concomitant MTX and that the risk of discontinuation due to AE was high in elderly patients who did not use concomitant MTX.

Objective: To compare the incidence and risk factors of serious adverse events (SAEs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with etanercept (ETN) or adalimumab (ADA) between Korean and Japanese registries., Methods: We recruited 416 RA patients [505.2 patient-years (PYs)] who started ETN or ADA from Korean registry and 537 RA patients (762.0 PY) from Japanese registry. The patient background, incidence rate (IR) of SAE in 2 years, and risk factors for SAEs were compared., Results: Korean patients were younger and used more nonbiologic DMARDs, higher doses of methotrexate, and lower doses of prednisolone (PSL). The IR of SAEs (/100 PY) was higher in the Japanese registry compared to the Korean [13.65 vs. 6.73]. In both registries, infection was the most frequently reported SAE. The only significant risk factor for SAEs in Korean registry was age by decade [1.45]. In Japanese registry, age by decade [1.54], previous use of nonbiologic DMARDs ≥ 4 [1.93], and concomitant use of oral PSL ≥ 5 mg/day [2.20] were identified as risk factors for SAEs., Conclusions: The IR of SAE in Japan, especially infection, was higher than that of Korea, which was attributed to the difference of demographic and clinical characteristics of RA patients and treatment profiles.

Purpose: Intravenous (IVIG) and subcutaneous (SCIG) immunoglobulin infusions are widely used for the treatment of patients with primary immunodeficiency (PID) worldwide. This prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm Phase III study evaluated the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of IgPro20 (Hizentra®; L-proline-stabilized 20 % human SCIG) in adult and pediatric Japanese patients with PID., Methods: Patients received three IVIG infusions at 3-4-week intervals followed by a dose-equivalent switch to weekly SCIG infusions. A 12-week wash-in/wash-out period was followed by a 12-week SCIG efficacy period. The primary efficacy endpoint was the comparison of total serum IgG trough levels during the IVIG and SCIG efficacy periods by calculating the geometric mean ratio (GMR)., Results: The GMR of IgG trough levels on SCIG versus IVIG was 1.09 (2-sided 90% confidence interval: 1.06-1.13). No serious bacterial infections were reported. Eleven patients (52.4%) had infectious episodes with an overall rate of 2.98 infections/patient/year; 7 patients (33.3%) missed school/work/daycare due to infection (3.48 days/patient/year). Sixteen patients (76.2%) were treated with antibiotics for an adverse event (AE; 47.6%) or prophylaxis (23.8%), resulting in 167.42 days/patient/year of antibiotic use. During SCIG treatment, 24 patients (96.0%) had 269 AEs (0.461 AEs per/infusion) including local reactions as the most common AE (20 patients, 80.0%). Local tolerability of IgPro20 was assessed as "very good" or "good" after 85.4% of SCIG infusions. One patient (4.0%) experienced a serious AE of moderate severity (bacterial infection) that was considered unrelated to study medication., Conclusion: IgPro20 was effective and well tolerated in Japanese patients with PID.

Objective: To assess real-world safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of etanercept monotherapy, etanercept plus methotrexate (MTX), or etanercept plus other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite previous treatment with DMARD., Methods: In this 24-week, all-cases postmarketing surveillance study, adverse events (AE) were coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities. Effectiveness was assessed every 4 weeks using the 28-joint Disease Activity Score and the European League Against Rheumatism response criteria., Results: Of 13,861 patients (81% women) in the analysis, 3616, 2506, and 7739, respectively, were classified into etanercept monotherapy (ETN-mono), etanercept plus DMARD other than MTX (ETN + DMARD), and etanercept plus MTX (ETN + MTX) groups. Rates of AE and serious AE (SAE) in the ETN + MTX group were lower than in other groups. Risk of SAE or serious infections was not significantly increased with higher versus lower MTX doses at baseline or with concomitant use of salazosulfapyridine or bucillamine in ETN + DMARD versus ETN-mono groups. A greater likelihood of achieving clinical remission was seen with ETN + MTX versus ETN-mono (OR 1.36; 95% CI, 1.16-1.60; p < 0.001). Higher MTX dose at baseline was associated with a higher remission rate (> 8 mg vs 0 to ≤ 4 mg, OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.07-2.00, p = 0.016; 6 to ≤ 8 mg vs 0 to ≤ 4 mg, OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.01-1.60, p = 0.038)., Conclusion: Combination therapies with etanercept plus MTX or other DMARD were reasonably well tolerated, and ETN + MTX at higher doses was more effective than ETN-mono in Japanese patients with RA.

Etanercept (ETN) is a fusion protein of the receptor (CD120b) for tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and the Fc portion of IgG1. A phase III trail and the JESMR study, both performed in Japan, implicated the importance of concomitant methotrexate (MTX) use in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Further evidences, including the TEAR study and the PRESERVE study, supported the recent treatment strategy for RA, being divided into at least two phases: remission induction phase(step-up or initial combination) and its maintenance phase (step-down). Thus, optimization of RA treatment chiefly based on MTX and anti-TNF biological agents is in progress.

Objective: To investigate associations between continuous treatments with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists and risk for developing serious infections (SIs) over 3 years in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) enrolled in the Registry of Japanese RA Patients for Long-Term Safety (REAL) database., Methods: We analyzed 727 RA patients who had started either infliximab or etanercept (the anti-TNF group; 1,480.1 patient-years [PY]) and 571 RA patients who had started conventional nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (the unexposed group; 1,104.1 PY) at the time of enrollment in the REAL. We assessed the occurrence of SIs within a 3-year observation period, including the period after switching to other TNF antagonists, and all SIs, unlimited to the first one in each patient as reported in other studies, to evaluate the real safety of TNF antagonists in daily practice., Results: The incidence rate of SIs per 100 PY was 5.54 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 4.44-6.84) in the anti-TNF group and 2.72 (95% CI 1.87-3.83) in the unexposed group. Poisson regression analysis revealed that the relative risk (RR) of continuous use of TNF antagonists for SIs after adjusting for baseline and time-dependent covariates was significantly elevated both overall (1.97, 95% CI 1.25-3.19) and for the first year (2.40, 95% CI 1.20-5.03), but not for the second and third years combined (1.38, 95% CI 0.80-2.43). The adjusted RR for SIs of etanercept compared to infliximab was not significantly elevated., Conclusion: Continuous anti-TNF therapy was significantly associated with increased risks for developing SIs during, but not after, the first year., (Copyright © 2012 by the American College of Rheumatology.)

The aim is to investigate the relationship of duration of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with safety and effectiveness of etanercept (ETN) in Japan. Post-marketing surveillance data for 7,099 patients treated with ETN were analyzed. Baseline characteristics, treatment effectiveness, incidence of adverse events (AEs), and serious AEs (SAEs) in relation to duration of RA were studied. At baseline, patients with RA for longer duration were older, weighed less, had more comorbidities, allergies, and corticosteroid use, but smoked less and had less morning stiffness. By 2-5 years with RA, more than half of the patients had advanced to Steinbrocker radiographic stage III or IV. Methotrexate (MTX) was the most commonly used pre-treatment disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; however, concomitant MTX use and its dose were lower among patients with longer duration of RA. Remission rates (26.6%) were greatest among patients having RA for <2 years. Less AEs and SAEs were observed among patients with shorter duration of RA. These results suggest that RA treatment in Japan in the era pre-biologics may not have been adequate to control disease activity and prevent joint destruction. Patients with shorter duration of RA may have better physical status which allows the opportunity to treat more intensively putting a higher percentage of patients in remission and possibly decreasing exposure to SAEs.

Finding an effective treatment strategy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who have not benefited from previous tumor necrosis factor-α antagonist treatment is important for minimizing RA disease activity and improving patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of etanercept in patients with and without infliximab (IFX) treatment experience. Patients (n = 7,099) from a large postmarketing observational study of etanercept use in Japan were divided into 2 cohorts based on previous IFX use (pre-IFX and non-IFX). Baseline characteristics were assessed in each cohort. Adverse events (AEs) and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) responses were monitored every 4 weeks for 24 weeks. At baseline, pre-IFX patients were younger and had fewer comorbidities and a shorter RA duration than non-IFX patients. During the study, pre-IFX patients received concomitant methotrexate more often than non-IFX patients. The incidence of AEs and serious AEs were significantly lower in pre-IFX patients, as was the percentage of patients who discontinued treatment. Both cohorts had significant improvement (P < 0.001) in EULAR responses at the end of the treatment period. This study demonstrated that etanercept was effective and well tolerated in active RA patients with and without prior IFX treatment.

Efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics results from 4 studies-3 open-label (OL) and 1 randomized double-blind (DB)-have provided data for approval of etanercept for treatment of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD)-refractory juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) in Japan. Results from the 3 shorter-term (2 OL and 1 DB) studies are reported here. Subjects (4-17 years) enrolled in the OL studies had active JIA, i.e. ≥5 swollen joints and ≥3 joints with limitation of motion and pain or tenderness. Subjects enrolled in the primary OL study received etanercept 0.4 mg/kg subcutaneously twice weekly; in the lower-dose OL study subjects received etanercept 0.2 mg/kg. Subjects in the primary OL study who completed ≥48 weeks could continue into a 12-week DB dose-down extension study in which subjects received etanercept 0.4 or 0.2 mg/kg twice weekly. The primary endpoint in all 3 studies, i.e. 30% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology criteria for JIA (ACR Pedi 30) at 12 weeks, was achieved by ≥80% of subjects by week 2 and sustained to week 12. Common adverse events reported were injection site reactions, nasopharyngitis, and gastroenteritis. These results provide further evidence that etanercept is effective therapy for DMARD-refractory polyarticular JIA patients.

Background & Aims: Distinction of immunoglobulin G4-associated cholangitis (IAC) from primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) or cholangiocarcinoma is challenging. We aimed to assess the performance characteristics of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) for the diagnosis of IAC., Methods: Seventeen physicians from centers in the United States, Japan, and the United Kingdom, unaware of clinical data, reviewed 40 preselected ERCs of patients with IAC (n = 20), PSC (n = 10), and cholangiocarcinoma (n = 10). The performance characteristics of ERC for IAC diagnosis as well as the κ statistic for intraobserver and interobserver agreement were calculated., Results: The overall specificity, sensitivity, and interobserver agreement for the diagnosis of IAC were 88%, 45%, and 0.18, respectively. Reviewer origin, specialty, or years of experience had no statistically significant effect on reporting success. The overall intraobserver agreement was fair (0.74). The operating characteristics of different ERC features for the diagnosis of IAC were poor., Conclusions: Despite high specificity of ERC for diagnosing IAC, sensitivity is poor, suggesting that many patients with IAC may be misdiagnosed with PSC or cholangiocarcinoma. Additional diagnostic strategies are likely to be vital in distinguishing these diseases., (Copyright © 2011 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Our aim was to evaluate real-world safety and effectiveness in a 6-month postmarketing surveillance study covering all Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who received etanercept during a 2-year period. Data for 13,894 patients (1334 sites) enrolled between March 2005 and April 2007 were collected. Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported in 4336 (31.2%) and 857 (6.2%) patients, respectively. The most frequent AEs were injection site reactions (n = 610, 4.4%) and rash (n = 339, 2.4%), whereas pneumonia (n = 116, 0.8%) and interstitial lung disease (n = 77, 0.6%) were the most frequent SAEs. Significant improvement in the proportion of patients with a good European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response was observed from week 4 (17.6%) to week 24 (31.6%) (p < 0.001); 84.3% of patients had good or moderate EULAR responses at week 24. The percentage of patients achieving remission increased significantly from week 4 (9.3%) to week 24 (18.9%) (p < 0.001). Patients with early moderate RA were less likely to experience SAEs and were more likely to achieve remission compared with patients with more severe disease. The safety and effectiveness of etanercept was demonstrated in Japanese patients in one of the largest observational trials conducted thus far in RA patients treated with biologics.

Objective: To compare tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitors to nonbiological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) for the risk of serious infection in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)., Methods: Serious infections occurring within the first year of the observation period were examined using the records for patients recruited to the Registry of Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients for Longterm Safety (REAL), a hospital-based prospective cohort of patients with RA. The analysis included 1144 patients, 646 of whom were treated with either infliximab or etanercept [exposed group: 592.4 patient-years (PY)]. The remaining 498 patients received nonbiological DMARD with no biologics (unexposed group: 454.7 PY)., Results: In the unexposed group, the incidence rate for all serious adverse events (SAE) was 9.02/100 PY and for serious infections, 2.64/100 PY. In the exposed group, SAE occurred in 16.04/100 PY and serious infections in 6.42/100 PY. The crude incidence rate ratio comparing serious infections in the exposed group with the unexposed group was 2.43 (95% CI 1.27-4.65), a significant increase. A multivariate analysis revealed that the use of TNF inhibitors is a significant independent risk factor for serious infection (relative risk 2.37, 95% CI 1.11-5.05, p = 0.026)., Conclusion: Our study has provided the first epidemiological data on Japanese patients with RA for the safety of TNF inhibitors compared to nonbiological DMARD for up to 1 year of treatment. Anti-TNF therapy was associated with a significantly increased risk for serious infections, compared to treatment with nonbiological DMARD.

Objective: Postmarketing surveillance (PMS) was conducted evaluating safety and effectiveness of etanercept (ETN; Enbrel) in Japan, following all patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) during the conditional approval period of ETN., Methods: Registration of patients from 1,334 medical sites was conducted between March 2005 and April 2007. Patients were followed for 24 weeks; data regarding patients' background, safety, and effectiveness was recorded centrally. Adverse events (AE) and adverse drug reactions (ADR) were coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities. Effectiveness was measured using the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)., Results: Of 14,369 patients registered, data collection and evaluation for 7,091 patients by March 2006 is reported. At least 1 AE was observed for 2,173 patients (30.6%); 60% of AE occurred within 8 weeks of starting ETN. Most frequent AE were injection site reaction (n = 377, 5.3%) and rash (n = 228, 3.2%). Serious AE occurred in 403 patients (5.7%); most frequent were pneumonia (n = 59, 0.8%) and interstitial lung disease (n = 42, 0.6%). Pneumonia was the most common specifically important ADR (n = 102, 1.4%). Mean baseline DAS28 was 6.0, which reduced to 4.4 within 4 weeks, and to 3.9 within 24 weeks. The proportion of patients having good or moderate EULAR response measured by DAS28 was 84.1% at Week 24. Effectiveness rates were more favorable in patients concomitantly using methotrexate. Good or moderate EULAR response rate among patients switched from infliximab was 84.9%., Conclusion: This extensive observational trial, including all patients with RA in Japan taking ETN, found ETN to be both effective and well tolerated by Japanese patients with RA., Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00503503.

Etanercept is a soluble tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor fusion protein that binds and inactivates TNF. Since etanercept was just approved in January 2005 in Japan, a strict postmarketing surveillance has been undertaken. In this trial, initial 3,319 patients with rheumatoid arthritis were collected, and the adverse events and efficacy of etanercept were evaluated. The frequency of adverse events were found in 30.9 %, among total patients particularly severe adverse effects in 4.2 %. Among severe adverse events, 83 patients experienced infection. They included 25 patients with bacterial pneumonia. Interstitial pneumonia, pneumocystis jiroveci and tuberculosis were observed in 11 cases (0.3 %), 5 cases (0.2 %) and 2 cases (0.1%), respectively. Patients who received etanercept had a more rapid rate of improvement in disease activity determined by DAS 28 ESR and DAS28 CRP. These improvements continued through 24 months of etanercept exposure. Using the analysis of EULAR response criteria, the good or moderate response in the DAS 28 ESR response and DAS 28 CRP was found in more than 80% of patients with RA.

Application of biological agents targeting tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) caused a paradigm shift in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The introduction of infliximab in 2003 and etanercept in 2005 in Japan had a significant impact on both Japanese rheumatologists and RA patients, although serious adverse effects such as bacterial pneumonia, tuberculosis and Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia are significant concerns. Based on the data from post-marketing surveillance in Japan and accumulating evidence worldwide, the Internal Medicine Rheumatology Study Group of the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (MHLW), Japan, has updated the guidelines for the use of anti-TNF-alpha agents for RA, which were subsequently approved by the Board of Japan College of Rheumatology (JCR). In the present revised guidelines, we combined the guidelines for use of each of infliximab and etanercept together with some modifications and precautions, paying special attention to serious adverse reactions. Although it is still controversial whether the use of TNF-alpha blocking agents per se increases the risk of infection or not, bacterial pneumonia, regardless of the pathogens, is the most frequent complications in RA. The risk factors associated with pneumonia identified in the post-marketing surveillance of infliximab in Japan are presented in this guideline. The diagnostic algorithm is also designed for early diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary lesions seen during the treatment of biological agents. Preventive measures and precautions against tuberculosis, another frequent and significant complication in Japan, are also described. Furthermore, risk factors for developing Pneumocystis pneumonia, which uniquely occurs at 30- to 50-fold frequency under TNF-alpha blockade therapy in Japan, are described here and its preventive measures are discussed. It is stressed that secondary-care rheumatologists should be better familiarized with the proper use of TNF-alpha blocking agents and be alert to any adverse events for a better management of RA patients.