Search

Summary: Background: Long‐term efficacy and safety of ixekizumab [160 mg at week 0, then 80 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) for 12 weeks, followed by every 4 weeks (Q4W) thereafter (i.e. Q2W/Q4W), which is the labelled psoriasis dosing where approved, except in Japan] have been established for the treatment of adults with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis. However, some patients may benefit from remaining on Q2W dosing beyond 12 weeks. Methods: Among patients who had static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) > 1 at week 12, efficacy through week 52 of continuous Q2W dosing in the IXORA‐P study was compared indirectly with Q2W/Q4W in the integrated data from the UNCOVER‐1, UNCOVER‐2 and UNCOVER‐3 studies. The continuous Q4W dose group, which had comparable results across studies, was used as the common comparator. Results: In the IXORA‐P study, among patients with sPGA > 1 at week 12, 64% of patients in the continuous Q2W group achieved sPGA ≤ 1 at week 52, which was statistically significantly higher than the 36% of patients with sPGA > 1 in the Q2W/Q4W group based on the integrated data from the UNCOVER studies (P = 0·0007). There were no clinically meaningful differences in frequencies of safety events between patients with sPGA ≤ 1 and patients with sPGA > 1 at week 12 in the IXORA‐P study. Conclusions: Among patients who did not have clear or almost clear skin at week 12, nearly 30% more patients who were treated continuously with ixekizumab Q2W in IXORA‐P had clear or almost clear skin at week 52 when compared indirectly with those who were treated using the labelled psoriasis dosing in integrated UNCOVER studies. What's already known about this topic? Most patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis who were given the labelled psoriasis dosing of ixekizumab [160‐mg loading dose at week 0, 80 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) through week 12, and 80 mg every 4 weeks (QW4) thereafter] respond quickly with a high percentage of skin clearance.Additionally, patients who achieve static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) ≤ 1 by week 12 tend to maintain this response, even after switching to Q4W. What does this study add? Here, we assessed whether patients with sPGA > 1 at week 12 benefited from receiving more frequent dosing beyond the first 12 weeks.The results showed that Q2W dosing beyond 12 weeks resulted in more patients achieving sPGA ≤ 1 by week 52 than the labelled psoriasis dosing among patients with sPGA > 1 at week 12. Linked Comment: Kim. Br J Dermatol 2020; 183:6. Plain language summary available online Respond to this article [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Psoriasis involvement in special areas (e.g., scalp or nails) is associated with a great disease burden yet it is often inadequately treated with topical treatments. The efficacy and tolerability of apremilast plus existing topical therapy in Japanese patients with mild to moderate plaque psoriasis were demonstrated in PROMINENT, a phase 3b, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study. We evaluated the efficacy of apremilast across disease severities and special areas involved in these patients. Methods: In PROMINENT, patients received apremilast 30 mg twice daily for 16 weeks in addition to their existing topical therapy, with the option of topical therapy reduction at the discretion of their physician while continuing apremilast treatment from Weeks 16 to 32. We performed a post hoc analysis, assessing apremilast efficacy and safety in Japanese patients stratified by baseline static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) score (2 [mild] or 3 [moderate]) and special area involvement. Results: Of patients with baseline sPGA = 2 and sPGA = 3, 62.7% and 30.7%, respectively, achieved sPGA score 0 or 1 at Week 32. At Week 32, improvements in skin, nail, scalp, and quality of life assessments were observed regardless of baseline sPGA score. Improvements in these endpoints at Week 32 were also observed in patients with special area (scalp or nail) involvement (n = 134). Incidence of adverse events was similar between patients with baseline sPGA = 2 and sPGA = 3. Conclusions: Apremilast in combination with topical therapy may be a beneficial treatment for Japanese patients, who have limited systemic treatment options for mild to moderate psoriasis or psoriasis in special areas. Trial Registration: NCT03930186. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tapinarof is a nonsteroidal, topical, aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonist. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of tapinarof cream 1% in Japanese patients aged ≥12 years with atopic dermatitis (AD) in two phase 3 trials, ZBB4-1 and ZBB4-2. ZBB4-1 (N = 216) consisted of an 8-week, double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period (period 1) and a 16-week extension treatment period (period 2). Patients were randomized 2:1 to tapinarof or vehicle in period 1; subsequently, all patients who enrolled in period 2 received tapinarof. ZBB4-2 (N = 291) was a 52-week, open-label, uncontrolled trial in which all patients received tapinarof. In period 1 of ZBB4-1, the proportion of patients who achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) with ≥2-grade improvement from baseline at week 8 (IGA treatment success, the primary end point) was 20.24% in the tapinarof group and 2.24% in the vehicle group (p = 0.0007). The proportion of patients with ≥75% improvement from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score at week 8 (EASI-75 response, the key secondary end point) was 40.3% in the tapinarof group and 4.3% in the vehicle group (p < 0.0001). In ZBB4-2, IGA treatment success rate was 28.1% at week 16, 32.3% at week 24, and 41.3% at week 52, and EASI-75 response rate was 53.3% at week 16, 63.7% at week 24, and 76.6% at week 52, indicating that efficacy responses improved over time and were maintained over 52 weeks. Across the two trials, most adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate; common AEs included folliculitis, acne, and headache. In summary, tapinarof cream 1% was effective and generally safe for up to 52 weeks of treatment in Japanese patients with AD., (© 2024 The Author(s). The Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Dermatological Association.)

Psossibility and appropriate timing of discontinuation of dupilumab for atopic dermatitis (AD) remain unclear. We explored the possibility of patients, who could maintain remission with topical therapy alone after withdrawing dupilumab in the real world. Furthermore, we identified their characteristics. All adult AD patients who initiated dupilumab from June 2018 to July 2022 and were treated with dupilumab for more than 3 months at our hospital were included in this study. The observation period was from June 2018 to July 2023. In 138 patients, 58 (42.0%) discontinued dupilumab at least once. Among them, 18 (13.0%) discontinued dupilumab but reinitiated dupilumab later due to exacerbation. Only seven patients (5.1%) could maintain remission with topical therapy alone after discontinuation of dupilumab, with characteristics of lower POEM, VAS of pruritus, serum levels of TARC and LDH, and neutrophil counts at baseline, and those of longer duration of dupilumab until its discontinuation (24.0 ± 13.3 vs. 12.8 ± 7.3 months) and lower EASI and affected BSA at the discontinuation of dupilumab. In 118 patients treated with dupilumab for at least 1 year, 38 patients (32.2%) discontinued at least once. Only four patients (3.4%) could maintain remission with topical therapy alone after discontinuation of dupilumab, with characteristics of lower POEM at baseline and lower EASI at the discontinuation of dupilumab. In conclusion, maintaining remission after withdrawing dupilumab is challenging. Discontinuation of dupilumab may be considered in patients with low baseline POEM, after more than 2 years of dupilumab treatment, with a substantial decrease in EASI., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Dupilumab was approved for treating adult patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) refractory to topical therapy in Japan in April 2018, and self‐injection of dupilumab has been available since May 2019. Subcutaneous self‐injection of medication has benefits for patients and the healthcare system. However, anxiety about self‐injection, lack of confidence, and the complicated procedure could prevent initiating self‐injection. In this study, we assessed the experience of AD patients treated with dupilumab before and after introducing self‐injection, utilizing the Self‐Injection Assessment Questionnaire (SIAQ). Adult AD patients who received dupilumab by self‐injection and had been treated for more than 3 months after initiating self‐injection in our hospital from March 1, 2020, to June 19, 2021, were included in this study. Patients rated their perceptions about self‐injections using the SIAQ before the first self‐injection and 3 months after initiating self‐injection. Data were collected retrospectively from their charts. Data on 36 patients were analyzed. The mean age was 34.1 ± 11.5 years. Twenty patients used a prefilled auto‐injector, and the others used a prefilled syringe. Scores on self‐confidence and satisfaction with self‐injection significantly improved after introducing self‐injection. Feelings about injections improved in patients over 40 years and in those who felt anxious about self‐injection. A strong correlation in scores between satisfaction with self‐injection and the ease of use was observed. The results were not affected by clinical severity, gender, or device. Our results could encourage patients who dither to introduce self‐injection of dupilumab due to anxiety and/or lack of self‐confidence about self‐injection to initiate self‐injection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: This study aimed to retrospectively examine the drug survival of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha inhibitors and switched subsequent biologic agents after discontinuation of TNF inhibitors. Methods: This real-world setting study was conducted at a single academic center. We included patients who were treated with adalimumab (n = 111), certolizumab pegol (n = 12), and infliximab (n = 74) at Jichi Medical University Hospital from 1 January 2010 to 31 July 2021. Results: No significant differences were noted in drug survival between the three TNF inhibitors. The 10-year drug survival rate for adalimumab and infliximab was 14% and 18%, respectively. Of the patients who discontinued TNF inhibitors for any reason (n = 137), 105 chose biologics as their subsequent treatment. The subsequent biologics included 31 cases of TNF inhibitors (adalimumab in 20, certolizumab pegol in 1, and infliximab in 10), 19 of interleukin-12/23 inhibitor (ustekinumab), 42 of interleukin-17 inhibitors (secukinumab in 19, brodalumab in 9, and ixekizumab in 14) and 13 of interleukin-23 inhibitors (guselkumab in 11, risankizumab in 1, and tildrakizumab in 1). Cox proportional hazards analysis for the subsequent drugs in cases of discontinuation due to inadequate efficacy revealed that female sex was a predictor of drug discontinuation (hazard ratio 2.58, 95% confidence interval 1.17–5.70) and that taking interleukin-17 inhibitors rather than TNF inhibitors was a predictor of drug persistence (hazard ratio 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.15–0.93). Conclusions: Interleukin-17 inhibitors may be a favorable option for patients who need to switch from TNF inhibitors due to inadequate efficacy. However, this study is limited by the small number of cases and its retrospective design. Plain Language Summary: With many biologic options available for the treatment of psoriasis, choosing the optimal drug can be challenging, especially when switching drugs. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors are the oldest category of biologics used for psoriasis, with adalimumab and infliximab being available since 2010 and certolizumab pegol since 2019 in Japan. In this study, we examined the drug survival of TNF inhibitors in patients treated with adalimumab (n = 111), certolizumab pegol (n = 12), and infliximab (n = 74) at Jichi Medical University Hospital from 1 January 2010 to 31 July 2021. No significant differences were noted in drug survival between the three TNF inhibitors, and the 10-year drug survival rate for adalimumab and infliximab was 14% and 18%, respectively. We examined the drug survival of subsequent biologics used by patients who discontinued TNF inhibitors for any reason (n = 137) and found that among patients who discontinued TNF inhibitors due to inadequate efficacy, female sex was a predictor of drug discontinuation and that taking interleukin-17 inhibitors rather than TNF inhibitors was a predictor of drug continuation. The study results suggest that interleukin-17 inhibitors is a favorable option for patients who discontinue TNF inhibitors due to inadequate efficacy and need to switch to other agents. However, this study has limitations, including the small number of cases and the single-center and retrospective study design. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common chronic inflammatory skin disorder in Japan. Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, targets a shared subunit of the interleukin (IL)‐4 and IL‐13 receptors. Post‐marketing surveillance of the safety and effectiveness of dupilumab in adult AD patients was conducted in Japan, where the drug is also allowed for use in older adolescents (i.e., ≥15 years), and interim results are reported here. Methods: This observational, multicenter study enrolled Japanese patients with AD who initiated dupilumab between July 2018–June 2020 (UMIN‐CTR Trials Registry: UMIN000032807). Baseline demographics, clinical history, medication data and dupilumab safety and effectiveness data were collected. Results: By the data cut‐off date of March 26, 2021, information from 600 patients has been collected. All the available safety and 1‐year effectiveness data are presented. The mean (standard deviation) age was 42.0 (15.9) years, the majority (69.1%) were male, and asthma was present in 12.2%. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were observed in 98 patients (16.4%), including conjunctivitis (n = 40; 6.7%), conjunctivitis allergic (n = 30; 5.0%), blepharitis (n = 5; 0.8%), headache and eye pruritus (n = 4; 0.7% each) and eosinophilia (n = 3; 0.5%). Six patients experienced asthma, all of whom had a history of, or concurrent, asthma. Disease severity improved remarkably at 4 months in most patients, which was maintained up to 1 year. Conclusion: Dupilumab appears to be a safe and effective treatment for patients aged ≥15 years with moderate‐to‐severe AD in routine clinical practice in Japan. Dupilumab was well tolerated, with no new safety signals and no new‐onset asthma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There are prevalent financial relationships between dermatologists and pharmaceutical companies in Japan. However, little was known about the extent of whole picture of the personal payments made to dermatologists by pharmaceutical companies. This study aimed to examine the personal payments to the board-certified dermatologists by the Japanese Dermatological Association from the pharmaceutical companies between 2016 and 2019. Using the publicly disclosed payments data by the pharmaceutical companies between 2016 and 2019, we evaluated the magnitude, prevalence, and trends in the personal payments made to all board-certified dermatologists for the lecturing, writing, and consulting compensations. The payments were descriptively analyzed overall and by dermatologist demographics. Additionally, the payment trends were assessed by generalized estimating equation models. Of 6883 active board-certified dermatologists, 3121 (45.3%) received a total of $33,223,806 personal payments between 2016 and 2019. The median per-physician payments and number of payments (interquartile range) were $1737 ($613–$5287) and 4.0 (2.0–10.0) over the 4 years, respectively. Only top 1%, 5%, 10% of dermatologists received 41.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 38.2–45.1%), 76.9% (95% CI 74.7–79.1%), and 87.6% (95% CI 86.2–88.9%) of overall payments. The number of dermatologists receiving payments and per-dermatologist payments increased by 4.3% (95% CI 3.1‒5.5%, p < 0.001) and 16.4% (95% CI 13.5‒19.4%, p < 0.001) each year. The board-certification in dermatology-oncology, in cosmetic dermatology, and male sex were significantly associated with higher personal payments with relative monetary values of 2.29 (95% CI 1.65–3.19, p < 0.001), 3.16 (95% CI 1.89–5.26, p < 0.001), and 5.38 (95% CI 4.12–7.04, p < 0.001). Less than half of Japanese board-certified dermatologists received lower personal payments from the pharmaceutical companies than those to other specialists. However, these personal payments were increasingly more prevalent and greater over the 4 years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As the first biologics for psoriasis in Japan, infliximab and adalimumab, anti-tumor necrosis factor-α antibodies, became available in the field of dermatology in 2010, followed by ustekinumab, an anti-interleukin (IL)-12/IL-23p40 antibody, which was launched in Japan in 2011. Since 2015, three IL-17 inhibitors of secukinumab and ixekizumab, anti-IL-17A antibodies, and brodalumab, an anti-IL-17 receptor antibody, and two anti-IL-23p19 antibodies of guselkumab and risankizumab, have also been launched. It is important for physicians to select appropriate biologic therapy for each psoriatic patient after due consideration of disease factors, treatment factors and patient background factors, sharing such information with patients. The following can be listed as points to be considered for the selection of biologics: drug effects (e.g. strength of effectiveness, time to onset of effectiveness, effectiveness against arthritis, primary failure, secondary failure), safety (e.g. infections, administration-related reactions and relationships with other comorbidities), convenience for patients (e.g. hospital visit intervals, self-injection, maintenance therapy at clinics, feasibility of drug discontinuation/re-administration) and payment (medical costs) borne by patients. This guidance has been prepared with the aim of allowing dermatologists experienced in the treatment of psoriasis to use biologics appropriately according to the circumstances of individual patients after consideration of the above-mentioned factors., (© 2020 Japanese Dermatological Association.)

Background: The Japanese biosimilar guideline requires that the sponsors conduct clinical studies such as comparative pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD), or efficacy studies. In each biosimilar development, the sponsors consider the clinical data package, and thus clinical data packages vary among biosimilar developments., Objectives: The aim of this study was to elucidate the clinical data packages for the biosimilars approved in Japan. The details of clinical data packages and sample size for the regulatory approvals of biosimilars in Japan was reported., Methods: We surveyed the clinical data packages and sample size based on the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) website review reports between 2009 and 2023., Results: Twenty-four biosimilars have been approved based on the comparative PK and efficacy studies, 10 biosimilars have been approved based on the comparative PK/PD study, and one biosimilar has been approved based on the comparative efficacy study. Regarding the sample size, comparative PK studies were conducted in healthy volunteers or patients for up to 300 cases, although the majority enrolled only 1-100 cases (68.1%, 32/47). Comparative PD studies enrolling 1-30, 31-60, and 61-90 cases totaled 4, 7, and 4 cases, respectively. Finally, comparative efficacy studies enrolling 1-300, 301-600, and 601-900 totaled 6, 10, and 11 cases, respectively. In particular, the oncology and rheumatology areas were the first and second disease areas recruiting 601-900 patients., Conclusion: Large numbers of patients were enrolled to conduct a comparative efficacy study. Efficient biosimilar development should be considered on the basis of the accumulation of scientific understanding of comparable features of biosimilars and their development., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Plaque psoriasis is a systemic immune-mediated disease driven by interleukin-17 producing cells under the regulation of interleukin-23. Interleukin-23 signaling is mediated by the intracellular kinase tyrosine kinase 2, a Janus kinase family member. Tyrosine kinase 2 is a potential target for oral small-molecule therapies to treat psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. A number of tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitors are in development or approved for the treatment of psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis. Deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration as a first-in-class treatment for adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy, and is approved by Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PDMA) in Japan for patients with plaque psoriasis, generalized pustular psoriasis, and erythrodermic psoriasis who have had an inadequate response to conventional therapies. Deucravacitinib selectively binds to the unique tyrosine kinase 2 regulatory pseudokinase domain in an allosteric fashion, preventing a conformational change in the catalytic domain required for ATP substrate binding, thus effectively locking tyrosine kinase 2 in an inactive state. Two other tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitors in later stage clinical development, brepocitinib (PF-06700841) and ropsacitinib (PF-06826647), are orthosteric inhibitors that target the highly conserved catalytic domain. This selective allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibition may explain the improved safety profile of deucravacitinib versus orthosteric Janus kinase and tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitors. Two phase 3 psoriasis trials demonstrated deucravacitinib was efficacious and not associated with safety concerns characteristic of Janus kinase inhibitors, hence the new class designation (TYK2 inhibitor) by health authorities in the USA and Japan. Allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitors represent a promising new class of molecules for the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, and longer-term trials will establish their place in therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atopic dermatitis (AD) places a burden on work productivity. Recently, dupilumab was approved for AD, but its impact on work productivity in Japanese patients has not been reported. Furthermore, data on the effect of long-term treatment with dupilumab on work productivity are limited. We investigated the work productivity and activity in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe AD, utilizing the Japanese version of the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI-AD-Japan) questionnaire. Furthermore, we examined the impact of dupilumab on work productivity. Adult moderate-to-severe AD patients treated with dupilumab for more than 12 months from March 2020 to June 2022 who filled out the WPAI-AD-Japan questionnaire were included. Twenty-eight adult AD patients were analysed. Absenteeism was low (mean: 5.3%), but presenteeism, work productivity loss and activity impairment were high (36.8%, 39.7%, 48.9%, respectively). Significant positive correlations were observed between work productivity loss and visual analogue scale (VAS) score of pruritus and between activity impairment and dermatology life quality index (DLQI). Dupilumab treatment significantly reduced presenteeism, work productivity loss and activity impairment at both 6 and 12 months. The extent of their amelioration was numerically higher at 12 months than at 6 months. The reduction rates in presenteeism, work productivity loss and activity impairment were positively correlated with the reduction rates in DLQI and VAS score of pruritus at 12 months. Dupilumab improved work productivity in Japanese AD patients. Long-term remission of pruritus and improved quality of life are important for comprehensive improvement of work productivity., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: Patients with mild-to-moderate plaque psoriasis often experience reduced quality of life and increased disease burden due to itch or involvement of psoriasis in special areas such as the scalp and nails. Systemic therapy may be used concurrently with topical therapy in patients with active disease not controlled by topical therapy alone. The objective of PROMINENT was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apremilast in combination with topical therapy in patients with mild-to-moderate psoriasis in Japan. Methods: PROMINENT, a phase 3b, open-label, single-arm study in Japan, enrolled adults ≥ 20 years of age with plaque psoriasis [static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) 2 (mild) or 3 (moderate)] not adequately controlled by topical therapy. Patients received apremilast 30 mg twice daily for 16 weeks in addition to their existing topical therapy, with the option of topical therapy reduction at the discretion of their physician while continuing apremilast treatment from weeks 16 to 32. Results: Of the 152 patients enrolled in the study, 136 completed week 32. The primary endpoint of sPGA response [score 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear)] was achieved by 43.7% of patients at week 16, and 40.8% maintained response at week 32. Clinically meaningful improvements in skin, scalp, and nails were observed in > 40% of patients at weeks 16 and 32. Similarly, improvements in pruritus, quality of life, and treatment satisfaction were observed at week 16 and maintained at week 32. Common treatment-emergent adverse events through week 32 included gastrointestinal events, nasopharyngitis, and headache. Conclusions: Apremilast in combination with topical therapy resulted in clinically meaningful and sustained efficacy in physician- and patient-reported outcomes at weeks 16 and 32 in Japanese patients with mild-to-moderate psoriasis. Tolerability was consistent with available prior safety data for apremilast. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03930186. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objective: Abrocitinib is a Janus kinase 1 inhibitor in development for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD). This work characterized orally administered abrocitinib population pharmacokinetics in healthy individuals, patients with psoriasis, and patients with AD and the effects of covariates on abrocitinib exposure. Methods: Abrocitinib concentration measurements (n = 6206) from 995 individuals from 11 clinical trials (seven phase I, two phase II, and two phase III) were analyzed, and a non-linear mixed-effects model was developed. Simulations of abrocitinib dose proportionality and steady-state accumulation of maximal plasma drug concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve (AUC) were conducted using the final model. Results: A two-compartment model with parallel zero- and first-order absorption, time-dependent bioavailability, and time- and dose-dependent clearance best described abrocitinib pharmacokinetics. Abrocitinib coadministration with rifampin resulted in lower exposure, whereas Asian/other race coadministration with fluconazole and fluvoxamine, inflammatory skin conditions (psoriasis/AD), and hepatic impairment resulted in higher exposure. After differences in body weight are accounted for, Asian participants demonstrated a 1.43- and 1.48-fold increase in Cmax and AUC, respectively. The overall distribution of exposures (Cmax and AUC) was similar in adolescents and adults after accounting for differences in total body weight. Conclusions: A population pharmacokinetics model was developed for abrocitinib that can be used to predict abrocitinib steady-state exposure in the presence of drug–drug interaction effects or intrinsic patient factors. Key covariates in the study population accounting for variability in abrocitinib exposures are Asian race and adolescent age, although these factors are not clinically meaningful. Clinical Trial Numbers: NCT01835197, NCT02163161, NCT02201524, NCT02780167, NCT03349060, NCT03575871, NCT03634345, NCT03637790, NCT03626415, NCT03386279, NCT03937258. Plain Language Summary: Abrocitinib is a drug approved in the UK and Japan for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. A population pharmacokinetic model for abrocitinib was developed based on data from 11 clinical trials that included 995 healthy individuals or patients with atopic dermatitis or psoriasis. Simulations of different patient factors, such as age, race, sex, body weight, liver function, and drug–drug interactions, were tested to examine differences in abrocitinib drug levels achieved in the body. The results of these simulations indicate that although there are some differences in abrocitinib exposure, no dose adjustments of abrocitinib are necessary based on these factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Of those patients diagnosed with generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) in Japan, approximately 30% have a prior psoriasis vulgaris (PsV) diagnosis. Therefore, understanding factors associated with a GPP diagnosis is essential for early diagnosis of GPP in patients with PsV. This retrospective cohort study was conducted to identify associated factors for GPP diagnosis in patients with PsV. Eligible patients with two confirmed diagnoses of PsV with/without a confirmed GPP diagnosis (International Classification of Disease 10th revision codes L40.0 and L40.1, respectively) were identified from the Japanese Medical Data Center database (JMDC) (July 1, 2005-January 31, 2019). Weighted logistic regression was used to identify associated factors (based on recorded comorbidities) between the PsV only and PsV with GPP cohorts. Odds ratios (ORs) of ≥1.5, associated with a high probability of a GPP diagnosis, were reported for factors with ≥5 patients/cohort. The time from event to GPP diagnosis was evaluated. The highest associated factor for GPP diagnosis was psoriatic arthritis (OR 20.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 17.06-23.92, P < 0.0001), which also had the shortest time from event to GPP diagnosis (median 119 days). Other comorbidities associated with GPP diagnosis were other psoriasis, tonsillitis, and sinusitis. Treatments associated with GPP diagnosis included systemic corticosteroids (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.98-2.43, P < 0.0001; median time from treatment initiation to GPP diagnosis 180 days). Other associated treatments (other immunosuppressants, interleukin [IL]-17 or IL-23 inhibitors, and phototherapy) had a delay of ≥1 year from treatment initiation to GPP diagnosis. Back pain, headache, and fever were also identified as associated with a GPP diagnosis. Patients with PsV requiring systemic therapies are more likely to receive a GPP diagnosis than those not requiring systemic treatment. These data will help identify patients with PsV at high risk of developing GPP and potentially support early GPP diagnosis., (© 2023 The Authors. The Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Dermatological Association.)

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of risankizumab versus other biologic treatments (adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab, secukinumab, brodalumab, ixekizumab, and guselkumab) of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in Japan. A Markov cohort-level model was constructed to estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs for each treatment over a lifetime horizon. The model simulated patients' transition through one line of active biologic therapy followed by best supportive care and death. Transition probabilities were informed by network meta-analyses of Psoriasis Activity and Severity Index responses and adverse event-related discontinuation in clinical trials, as well as published real-world evidence and national mortality rates. Costs were evaluated from the health system, societal, and patient out-of-pocket perspectives. Risankizumab was expected to provide 0.30–0.89 additional QALYs versus comparator biologics. Under the health system perspective, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of risankizumab ranged from ¥2,545,812/QALY versus ustekinumab to ¥6,077,134/QALY versus adalimumab. Societal ICERs were lower, ranging from ¥921,770/QALY to ¥4,350,879/QALY. From the patient perspective, risankizumab was estimated to be cost-saving versus four comparators and was associated with ICERs of <¥500,000/QALY versus the remaining comparators. Risankizumab was associated with higher QALYs and, based on typical willingness-to-pay benchmarks (¥5-6.7 million/QALY), considered cost-effective versus other biologics for the treatment of psoriasis in Japan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Biologic agents are used in patients with severe psoriasis who have not adequately responded to existing conventional systemic therapies. However, only a limited number of medical institutions in Japan are approved to use them, and their relatively high cost represents a substantial burden to patients. Apremilast is an oral phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor approved in Japan for the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris in adult patients with an inadequate response to topical therapies and psoriatic arthritis in adult patients with active disease. To date, a large-scale real-world study of treatment patterns and costs associated with apremilast in Japan has not been conducted. The objective of this study was to assess whether apremilast can prolong time to first biologic therapy use and decrease total medical cost. Methods: Using the Medical Data Vision hospital-based claims database, 506 psoriasis patients were propensity score matched and analyzed (apremilast: n = 253; non-apremilast: n = 253). Results: The incidence rate of first biologic therapy use per 1000 patient-years was significantly lower in the apremilast group than in the non-apremilast group (30.3 vs. 107.6; P < 0.001), and the total medical costs per month were significantly lower in the apremilast group than in the non-apremilast group (76,594 yen/month vs. 102,411 yen/month, P < 0.001). In a sensitivity analysis of a propensity-score-matched subset of eligible patients prescribed biologics during the follow-up period (apremilast: n = 14; non-apremilast: n = 14), the incidence of first biologic therapy use was 2,797.6 per 1000 patient-years (95% CI: 1,656.9, 4,723.6) in the non-apremilast group and 856.1 per 1000 patient-years (95% CI: 507.0, 1,445.5) in the apremilast group. Conclusion: These results suggest that apremilast prolongs the time to first biologic therapy use in patients with psoriasis, thereby reducing the total medical cost and decreasing the economic burden on patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Since the 2012 Multinational Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (MAPP) survey, several systemic treatments for psoriasis (PsO) and/or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have been approved. The population-based UPLIFT survey was conducted to understand how perceptions of treatment-related outcomes have evolved, particularly for patients with mild to moderate PsO and/or PsA and their dermatologists. Methods: This population- and web-based survey was conducted from 2 March to 3 June 2020, in North America, Europe, and Japan. Adults with self-reported healthcare practitioner (HCP)-diagnosed PsO and/or PsA and dermatologists who spent > 50% of time treating patients and treated ≥ 20 patients with PsO, including plaque PsO, per month were included. Patient participants were recruited at random from online panels; dermatologists were recruited randomly from representative physician panels. Results: Of 264,054 patient responses, 3806 who self-reported an HCP diagnosis of PsO and/or PsA were included in the final sample; 67% had PsO alone, 28% had PsO and PsA, and 5% had PsA alone. The estimated population prevalence of psoriatic disease was 7% (PsO only: 4%; PsO and PsA: 2%; PsA only: 1%). Most patients (78%) reported PsO-involved body surface area (BSA) ≤ 3 palms, and ~ 90% or more reported itching, redness, flaking, and scales. Many PsO patients without diagnosed PsA reported musculoskeletal symptoms suggestive of PsA (63%). Across BSA categories, approximately one in four patients was not currently receiving treatment and > 50% had Dermatology Life Quality Index score > 5. Patients and dermatologists had different perceptions of PsO severity, office visit discussions, treatment goals, and treatment satisfaction. The survey was conducted during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which could have affected assessments of patient-reported outcomes and ability to have in-person HCP visits. Conclusions: Patients with PsO and PsA in UPLIFT reported high disease burden, including patients with limited skin involvement. An opportunity exists to align patient and dermatologist perceptions to optimize management of PsO and PsA. Infographic: Digital feature: This article is published with digital features, including an infographic, to facilitate understanding of the article. To view digital features for this article go to https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.17104586. Plain Language Summary: In recent years, several new treatments for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis have become available. The UPLIFT survey was conducted to understand how viewpoints on psoriatic disease outcomes have changed, especially for patients whose disease is mild or moderate. UPLIFT was a large, online, population-based survey conducted in North America, Europe, and Japan. Adults with psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis and dermatologists who treated at least 20 patients with psoriasis per month were included. There were 3806 patients who participated; of these, most had psoriasis and few had psoriatic arthritis. Most patients (78%) with mild to moderate psoriasis had a limited area of skin affected by psoriasis. Psoriasis symptoms were common and included itching, redness, flaking, and scales. Many patients without a diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis reported symptoms that could be related to this disease (such as joint discomfort). Although many patients had psoriasis symptoms, approximately one in four was not currently receiving treatment and more than half reported psoriasis impacted their quality of life. Patients and dermatologists had different perceptions of psoriasis severity, office visit discussions, treatment goals, and treatment satisfaction. There is an opportunity to improve treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis and to better align patient and physician perceptions of psoriasis. This survey was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, which could have partially affected some assessments and the ability to have in-person doctor visits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: We present certolizumab pegol (CZP) efficacy data across patient demographic and baseline disease characteristic subgroups from a phase 2/3 trial investigating CZP treatment in Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (PSO; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03051217). Methods: Patients were randomised 1:2:2 to placebo once every 2 weeks (Q2W), CZP 400 mg Q2W and CZP 200 mg Q2W (400 mg weeks 0, 2 and 4) for 16 weeks. Patients who achieved ≥ 50% reduction in their baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 50) score at week 16 continued therapy to week 52. PASI 75/90 (75% and 90% reduction, respectively) and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) 0/1 responder rates at weeks 16 and 52 were reported for patient demographic and baseline disease characteristic subgroups, including body mass index (BMI), PASI, disease duration and prior biologic use. Non-responder imputation was used. Results: Of the randomised patients, 2/26 patients in the placebo group, 47/53 patients in the CZP 400 mg Q2W group and and 39/48 patients in the CZP 200 mg Q2W group completed week 52. In the subgroups evaluated, week 16 efficacy was generally maintained through week 52. At week 52, PASI 75 was achieved by 84.2, 85.7 and 80.0% of patients receiving CZP 400 mg Q2W in the low (15.0–23.7 kg/m2)/intermediate (> 23.7–27.4 kg/m2)/high (> 27.4–47.0 kg/m2) BMI subgroups, respectively, and by 77.8, 70.6 and 69.2%, respectively of patients treated with CZP 200 mg Q2W. PASI 75 at week 52 was achieved by 92.9, 75.0 and 84.2% of patients receiving CZP 400 mg Q2W in the low (12.0–18.0)/intermediate (> 18.0–27.0)/high (> 27.0–67.2) baseline PASI subgroups, respectively, and by 85.0, 58.3 and 68.8% of patients receiving CZP 200 mg Q2W, respectively. Similar responses were observed across other subgroups evaluated for both CZP doses in PASI 75/90 and PGA 0/1. Conclusion: Clinically meaningful improvements in signs and symptoms of PSO were maintained through week 52 for CZP dosed at 400 mg Q2W or 200 mg Q2W, across patient subgroups. In general, a numerically greater response was observed for patients receiving CZP 400 mg Q2W versus those receiving CZP 200 mg Q2W across patient subgroups. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03051217. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This is the English version of the Japanese guidance for biologics in treating atopic dermatitis (AD). The signaling pathway mediated by interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 contributes to type 2 inflammatory responses and plays an important role in the pathogenesis of AD. IL-31 is a cytokine mainly produced by activated T cells and is known to be involved in the pruritus of AD. Biologics for AD have been approved, including dupilumab, an anti-IL-4 receptor α antibody that was approved for expanded use in AD in 2018. In 2022, nemolizumab, an anti-IL-31 receptor α antibody, was approved for pruritus of AD, and tralokinumab, an anti-IL-13 antibody, was approved for AD. Physicians who intend to use these drugs should sufficiently understand and comply with the contents of the guidelines prepared by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare to promote the optimal use of the drugs. In treatment with biologics, it is important to consider disease factors (activity and severity), treatment factors (dosage and administration as well as the efficacy and safety), and patients' background characteristics (age and comorbidities) and share this information with patients when choosing treatment options. This guidance was developed for board-certified dermatologists who specialize in treating AD, and for promoting the proper use of biologics, taking into account the variety of factors in individual patients., (© 2023 Japanese Dermatological Association.)

Psoriasis affects approximately 0.3% of the Japanese population. Recently, various effective systemic drugs have become available, and the continuation of a given treatment has become critical because of the chronic nature of psoriasis. Factors affecting drug survival (the time until treatment discontinuation) in psoriasis treatment include efficacy, safety, ease of use, and patient preference. In the present study, the authors retrospectively surveyed a multifacility patient registry to determine the real-world evidence of the survival rate of systemic interventions for psoriasis treatment. Patients with psoriasis who visited 20 facilities in the Western Japan area between January 2019 and May 2020 and gave written consent were registered as study participants, and their medical history of systemic interventions for psoriasis (starting from 2010) was retrospectively collected and analyzed. The drugs investigated were adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, guselkumab, risankizumab, cyclosporine, and apremilast. When drugs were discontinued, the reasons were also recorded. A total of 1003 patients with psoriasis including 268 with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) were enrolled. In biologics, more recently released drugs such as interleukin 17 inhibitors showed a numerically higher survival rate in the overall (post-2010) analysis. However, in the subset of patients who began treatment after 2017, the difference in the survival rate among the drugs was smaller. The reasons for discontinuing drugs varied, but a loss of efficacy against dermatological or joint symptoms were relatively frequently seen with some biologics and cyclosporine. The stratification of drug survival rates based on patient characteristics such as bio-naive or experienced, normal weight or obese, and with or without PsA, revealed that bio-experienced, obese, and PsA groups had poorer survival rates for most drugs. No notable safety issues were identified in this study. Overall, the present study revealed that the biologics show differences in their tendency to develop a loss of efficacy, and the factors that negatively impact the survival rate of biologics include the previous use of biologics, obesity, and PsA., (© 2023 Japanese Dermatological Association.)

Background and Objective: Risankizumab, a humanized monoclonal interleukin-23 antagonist antibody, has efficacy for treatment of plaque psoriasis, generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) and erythrodermic psoriasis (EP). These analyses characterized the relationships between risankizumab exposures and key efficacy and safety variables in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, GPP, or EP following treatment with 75 or 150 mg subcutaneous doses at weeks 0, 4, and every 12 weeks thereafter.Methods: Risankizumab average plasma concentrations (Cavg) were correlated with probabilities of achieving efficacy end points (PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100, and sPGA 0/1) using data from Japanese patients (N = 225) and non-Japanese patients (N = 1678) with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis enrolled in global trials, or a Japan Phase 2/3 trial.Results: The exposure-efficacy relationships in Japanese patients were consistent with relationships for patients in global Phase 3 trials. At Week 16, a plateau of efficacy was demonstrated for 150 mg subcutaneous dose providing estimated PASI 90 and sPGA 0/1 response probabilities of 77%, and 88%, respectively. The exposures for 75 mg dose appeared to be suboptimal for PASI 100 response and other efficacy responses in heavier patients. Exposure-safety analyses (N = 242) indicated no apparent relationship between risankizumab Cavg and key safety variables, including any adverse event, serious adverse event, infection and infestation, and serious infection during treatment, consistent with observations in the global trials.Conclusions: Overall, risankizumab 150 mg maximized efficacy, including PASI 100 response, in Japanese patients with psoriasis with no apparent relationship between exposure and evaluated safety variables.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03000075, NCT03022045, NCT02672852, NCT02684357, NCT02684370, NCT02694523, NCT02054481. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The goal of a treatment regimen for atopic dermatitis is to reach and maintain a state where the patient exhibits mild symptoms or an absence of symptoms, and the patient should not experience disturbance during daily activities. The basis of a treatment regimen for atopic dermatitis is topical therapy, and currently there exist topical corticosteroids, tacrolimus and delgocitinib. Using these, proactive therapy is performed as maintenance therapy after remission induction therapy. However, in cases of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis, topical drugs alone cannot induce remission and systemic therapies such as cyclosporin, ultraviolet therapy, and dupilumab should be used in combination. In particular, dupilumab has many advantages such as high efficacy, relatively few adverse reactions, and ease of use in elderly patients with severe atopic dermatitis. In this review, we present a treatment algorithm for atopic dermatitis that emphasizes the importance of maintaining remission after induction of remission, and summarizes the characteristics of current medication therapy for atopic dermatitis in Japan., (© 2020 Japanese Dermatological Association.)

This is a Japanese retrospective single-center study carried out between 1 January 2010 and 21 November 2018 at the Department of Dermatology in Jichi Medical University Hospital. The drug survival rate for six biologic agents used for the treatment of psoriasis was investigated. We reviewed the clinical records of 315 treatment series of 205 patients with moderate to severe psoriasis treated with adalimumab (103 cases), infliximab (70 cases), ustekinumab (66 cases), secukinumab (38 cases), brodalumab (12 cases) and ixekizumab (26 cases). In our study, ustekinumab revealed a trend towards higher drug survival among the six biologic agents. Ustekinumab had a higher drug survival rate than infliximab and secukinumab with significant differences by log-rank test among all patients and among biologic-naive (bio-naive) patients. There was no significant difference in drug survival between bio-naive and biologic-experienced (non-naive) patients in the treatment courses with adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab, secukinumab and ixekizumab. The dose augmentation therapy in infliximab-treated patients was associated with longer drug survival. Of all patients, 25 cases with generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) were included, who functioned as the negative predictor for drug persistence with a hazard ratio of 1.87 (95% confidence interval, 1.12-3.11; P = 0.016). Our results reveal that ustekinumab had a superior drug survival, which is supported by the previous studies. Further studies are needed to clarify the efficacy of biologic agents on patients with GPP., (© 2019 Japanese Dermatological Association.)

The authors discuss a study at Hyogo College of Medicine Hospital in Japan on the therapeutic effects and safety of dupilumab in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis who visited the hospital from April 2018 to May 2019, with highlights such as measurement of disease activity at the baseline visit and weeks 4 and 16, the baseline clinical attributes of the patients, and frequency of dupilumab-induced conjunctivitis in patients with a previous history of conjunctivitis.