Search

Patients receiving interleukin (IL)‐inhibiting biologics for moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis (PsO) may be treated with escalated doses to optimize outcomes. This study evaluated escalation prevalence in a Japanese claims analysis of patients with PsO diagnosis preceding IL‐inhibiting biologic treatment and ≥1 post‐induction maintenance claim (index date) with sufficient data availability from January 2014 to May 2022. Patients with non‐persistence were excluded. Expected daily dose (EDD) was calculated as the recommended maintenance dose divided by the treatment interval. Dose escalation was defined as ≥2 claims showing a ≥20% increase in the observed average daily dose (ADD) over the EDD (with sensitivities requiring ≥1 claim and ≥30%). Significant differences were tested using multivariable regressions. The study included 982 unique patients treated with brodalumab (BRO; n = 104), guselkumab (GUS; n = 207), ixekizumab (IXE; n = 159), risankizumab (RIS; n = 135), secukinumab (SEC; n = 215) and ustekinumab (UST; n = 196). Within 12 months, dose escalation was observed for all IL‐inhibiting biologics other than GUS and RIS: 44.4% for UST, 37.2% for IXE, 3.4% for SEC and 1.4% for BRO. In multivariable‐adjusted analyses, odds of dose escalation were significantly lower for all products relative to UST. In sensitivities, escalation was observed for all products except RIS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: In addition to various immunosuppressive agents, belimumab and anifrolumab became available in Japan. We aimed to investigate glucocorticoid-free clinical remission in a single-centre retrospective cohort in October 2023. Methods: Our cohort included patients with SLE who needed to start or increase glucocorticoids for disease activity and were followed up for more than 1 year. We investigated the rate of achievement of clinical remission off corticosteroids (CR off C), defined as no clinical score on the SLEDAI-2K without glucocorticoids, baseline predictors of CR off C, medications used when CR off C was achieved, and flare rates following CR off C. Results: Out of the 60 patients followed for an average of 5.4 (±2.6) years, 17 (28.3%) achieved CR off C in 3.6 (±1.2) years after enrolment. Use of belimumab and anifrolumab accounted for eight (47.1%) of the achievers. Among the baseline data, male sex, recent enrolment, high glucocorticoid dose, and detection of immune complex (IC) significantly predicted CR off C, while lupus nephritis (LN) and a low C3 level tended to predict it. In the multivariate analysis, IC detection was the only predictor of CR off C. Clinical flares were observed in 5.9% of the achievers during a median 1.2 years after achievement of CR off C. Conclusion: In the era of biologics, CR off C was achieved in 28.3% of the patient cohort requiring the start or increase of glucocorticoids for disease activity, with a relatively low rate of flares, suggesting that glucocorticoid-free clinical remission is an achievable target in SLE. IC disease, represented by male sex or nephritis, is likely to benefit from currently available medications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article discusses asthma-related death trends and the use of biologics for severe asthma in Japan, which is considered a super-aged society with a large population of individuals over 65 years old. The article highlights the gender disparity in asthma prevalence, with males being more affected until adolescence and females becoming more prevalent in adulthood. The highest number of adult patients with asthma in Japan was found among people in their 70s. The article also addresses the reasons for poor asthma control among older individuals and the initiatives taken by the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare to improve treatment efficacy. It emphasizes the importance of addressing regional disparities in severe asthma management and rectifying specialist imbalances to reduce asthma-related deaths among older adults. [Extracted from the article]

Many molecular targeted agents, including biologics, have emerged for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), but their high prices have prevented their widespread use. This study aimed to reveal the changes in patient characteristics and the therapeutic strategies of IBD before and after the implementation of biologics in Japan, where the unique health insurance system allows patients with IBD and physicians to select drugs with minimum patient expenses. The analysis was performed using a prospective cohort, including IBD expert and nonexpert hospitals in Japan. In this study, patients were classified into two groups according to the year of diagnosis based on infliximab implementation as the prebiologic and biologic era groups. The characteristics of therapeutic strategies in both groups were evaluated using association analysis. This study analyzed 542 ulcerative colitis (UC) and 186 Crohn's disease (CD). The biologic era included 53.3% of patients with UC and 76.2% with CD, respectively. The age of UC (33.9 years vs. 38.8 years, P < 0.001) or CD diagnosis (24.3 years vs. 31.9 years, P < 0.001) was significantly higher in the biologic era group. The association analysis of patients with multiple drug usage histories revealed that patients in the prebiologic era group selected anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α agents, whereas those in the biologic era group preferred biologic agents with different mechanisms other than anti-TNF-α. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that both patient characteristics and treatment preferences in IBD have changed before and after biologic implementation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The oral corticosteroid (OCS)-sparing effect of several biologics (BIOs) has been shown in clinical trials. To date, no study has evaluated differences in OCS dose reduction between BIO-initiated and BIO-non-initiated patients in real-world clinical practice. We compared dose reductions in maintenance OCS between BIO-initiated and BIO-non-initiated severe asthma patients in a real-world setting.Patients and Methods: This retrospective cohort study used the data from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database of Medical Data Vision in Japan. Severe asthma patients with continuous use of OCS were selected from December 2015 to February 2020. The primary endpoint was the proportion reduction in daily maintenance OCS dose from Week 0 to Week 24. Analyses were performed using inverse probability treatment weighting.Results: In total, 2927 patients were included (BIO-initiated: 239 patients, BIO-non-initiated: 2688 patients). Adjusted median (quartile [Q] 1–Q3) proportion reduction in daily maintenance OCS dose at Week 24 from the index date was 25.0% (0.0– 100.0%) and 0.0% (0.0– 83.3%) in the BIO-initiated and BIO-non-initiated groups, respectively (Hodges–Lehmann estimate [95% confidence interval], 0.0000% [0.0000– 0.3365%]). Respective proportions of patients in the BIO-initiated and BIO-non-initiated groups achieving dose reductions from the index date in the daily maintenance OCS dose at Week 24 were > 0% reduction, 56.6% and 44.1% (odds ratio [OR] 1.6554); ≥ 25% reduction, 50.5% and 40.6% (OR 1.4888); ≥ 50% reduction, 42.8% and 33.7% (OR 1.4714); and 100% reduction, 26.2% and 24.4% (OR 1.1005).Conclusion: Among severe asthma patients, the daily dose of maintenance OCS was reduced with BIO treatment. Although a higher percentage of patients in the BIO-initiated group had an OCS reduction of ≤ 75% than the BIO-non-initiated group, we found no clear difference in OCS reduction. Our findings will be justified by further research that incorporates a longer observation period and variables excluded from this study.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05136547). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the effect of the interaction between methotrexate and glucocorticoids on the risk of developing bacterial infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using biological disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). Methods: We used the 2005–2018 JMDC claims database, a nationwide claims database in Japan. From the database of 7 175 048 patients, study patients were obtained by applying the following exclusion criteria: no use of bDMARDs; without information on the date of prescription; without RA as a disease; other than the new users of bDMARDs; and age <18 years. The exposures were glucocorticoids and methotrexate, and the outcome was bacterial infection. The interaction effects were examined using multivariate Cox regression analysis. Bacterial infections were identified according to antibiotic prescription and International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision codes. Results: A total of 2837 RA patients were identified, with a median age of 50 years. The incidence of infection was 16.8% (95% confidence interval: 15.5–18.3). The interaction term for the doses of glucocorticoids and methotrexate was significant. Additionally, a higher dose of glucocorticoid was a significant risk factor for developing bacterial infections on the side of high doses of methotrexate. The incidence of bacterial infections tended to increase significantly with increasing methotrexate doses coprescribed with glucocorticoids ≥5 mg or glucocorticoid doses coprescribed with methotrexate ≥8 mg. Conclusion: Our results indicate a potential association between methotrexate dose and bacterial infections during bDMARDs administration with glucocorticoids in patients with RA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: This study aimed to retrospectively examine the drug survival of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha inhibitors and switched subsequent biologic agents after discontinuation of TNF inhibitors. Methods: This real-world setting study was conducted at a single academic center. We included patients who were treated with adalimumab (n = 111), certolizumab pegol (n = 12), and infliximab (n = 74) at Jichi Medical University Hospital from 1 January 2010 to 31 July 2021. Results: No significant differences were noted in drug survival between the three TNF inhibitors. The 10-year drug survival rate for adalimumab and infliximab was 14% and 18%, respectively. Of the patients who discontinued TNF inhibitors for any reason (n = 137), 105 chose biologics as their subsequent treatment. The subsequent biologics included 31 cases of TNF inhibitors (adalimumab in 20, certolizumab pegol in 1, and infliximab in 10), 19 of interleukin-12/23 inhibitor (ustekinumab), 42 of interleukin-17 inhibitors (secukinumab in 19, brodalumab in 9, and ixekizumab in 14) and 13 of interleukin-23 inhibitors (guselkumab in 11, risankizumab in 1, and tildrakizumab in 1). Cox proportional hazards analysis for the subsequent drugs in cases of discontinuation due to inadequate efficacy revealed that female sex was a predictor of drug discontinuation (hazard ratio 2.58, 95% confidence interval 1.17–5.70) and that taking interleukin-17 inhibitors rather than TNF inhibitors was a predictor of drug persistence (hazard ratio 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.15–0.93). Conclusions: Interleukin-17 inhibitors may be a favorable option for patients who need to switch from TNF inhibitors due to inadequate efficacy. However, this study is limited by the small number of cases and its retrospective design. Plain Language Summary: With many biologic options available for the treatment of psoriasis, choosing the optimal drug can be challenging, especially when switching drugs. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors are the oldest category of biologics used for psoriasis, with adalimumab and infliximab being available since 2010 and certolizumab pegol since 2019 in Japan. In this study, we examined the drug survival of TNF inhibitors in patients treated with adalimumab (n = 111), certolizumab pegol (n = 12), and infliximab (n = 74) at Jichi Medical University Hospital from 1 January 2010 to 31 July 2021. No significant differences were noted in drug survival between the three TNF inhibitors, and the 10-year drug survival rate for adalimumab and infliximab was 14% and 18%, respectively. We examined the drug survival of subsequent biologics used by patients who discontinued TNF inhibitors for any reason (n = 137) and found that among patients who discontinued TNF inhibitors due to inadequate efficacy, female sex was a predictor of drug discontinuation and that taking interleukin-17 inhibitors rather than TNF inhibitors was a predictor of drug continuation. The study results suggest that interleukin-17 inhibitors is a favorable option for patients who discontinue TNF inhibitors due to inadequate efficacy and need to switch to other agents. However, this study has limitations, including the small number of cases and the single-center and retrospective study design. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Limited information is available on the use of biologics in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) or SSc-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) in Japan. The types of biologics, treatment duration, treatment prior to biologics, concomitant treatment, and characteristics of patients receiving biologics were investigated. Methods: We used a Japanese hospital claims database provided by Medical Data Vision Co. (2008–2021). Results: In the database, 1186 of 34,207 SSc patients (3.5%) and 620 of 12,303 SSc-ILD patients (5.0%) received anti-interleukin-6 (anti-IL-6) drugs, anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) drugs, abatacept, or rituximab. The most common were anti-IL-6 drugs [used in 35.5% of SSc patients and 38.5% of SSc-ILD patients (tocilizumab, 34.5% and 36.6%)], followed by anti-TNF drugs [31.3% and 26.5% (etanercept, 10.5% and 9.0%; others, <8%)], abatacept (17.5% and 20.6%), and rituximab (15.7% and 14.4%). Among SSc and SSc-ILD patients treated with anti-IL-6 drugs, anti-TNF drugs, or abatacept, the most common immunosuppressive drugs prior to initiation of biologics were methotrexate and tacrolimus. Approximately half of patients receiving anti-IL-6 drugs, anti-TNF drugs, or abatacept continued treatment beyond 1 year. Conclusions: Our study indicates that off-label biologics have been used in a certain number of SSc or SSc-ILD patients in Japan, with tocilizumab the most common. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: As best practices for treating children with severe-onset ulcerative colitis remain controversial in the era of biologic agents, we prospectively investigated treatments and outcomes in a multicenter cohort. Methods: Using a Web-based data registry maintained in Japan between October 2012 and March 2020, we compared management and treatment outcomes in an S1 group defined by a Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index of 65 or more points at diagnosis with those in an S0 group defined by an index value below 65. Results: Three hundred one children with ulcerative colitis treated at 21 institutions were included, with follow-up for 3.6 ± 1.9 years. Among them, 75 (25.0%) were in S1; their age at diagnosis was 12.3 ± 2.9 years, and 93% had pancolitis. Colectomy free rates in S1 were 89% after 1 year, 79% after 2, and 74% after 5, significantly lower than for S0 (P = 0.0003). Calcineurin inhibitors and biologic agents, respectively, were given to 53% and 56% of S1 patients, significantly more than for S0 patients (P < 0.0001). Among S1 patients treated with calcineurin inhibitors when steroids failed, 23% required neither biologic agents nor colectomy, similarly to the S0 group (P = 0.46). Conclusions: Children with severe ulcerative colitis are likely to require powerful agents such as calcineurin inhibitors and biologic agents; sometimes colectomy ultimately proves necessary. Need for biologic agents in steroid-resistant patients might be reduced to an extent by interposing a therapeutic trial of CI rather than turning to biologic agents or colectomy immediately. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness of tofacitinib versus current biologics, considering combinations of first-line (1L) and second-line (2L) therapies, from a Japanese payer's perspective in patients with moderate-to-severe active UC following an inadequate response to conventional therapy and in those who were naïve to biologics. Methods: A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted during the time horizon specified in the Markov model, which considers a patient's lifetime as 60 years and an annual discount rate of 2% on costs and effects. The model compared tofacitinib with vedolizumab, infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, and ustekinumab. The time of active treatment was divided into induction and maintenance phases. Patients not responding to their biologic treatment after induction or during the maintenance phase were switched to a subsequent line of therapy. Treatment response and remission probabilities (for induction and maintenance phases) were obtained through a systematic literature review and a network meta-analysis that employed a multinomial analysis with fixed effects. Patient characteristics were sourced from the OCTAVE Induction trials. Mean utilities associated with UC health states and adverse events (AEs) were obtained from published sources. Direct medical costs related to drug acquisition, administration, surgery, patient management, and AEs were derived from the JMDC database analysis, which corresponded with the medical procedure fees from 2021. The drug prices were adjusted to April 2021. Further validation through all processes by clinical experts in Japan was conducted to fit the costs to real-world practices. Scenario and sensitivity analyses were also performed to confirm the accuracy and robustness of the base-case results. Results: In the base-case, the treatment pattern including 1L tofacitinib was more cost-effective than vedolizumab, infliximab, golimumab, and ustekinumab for 1L therapies in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained (based on the Japanese threshold of 5,000,000 yen/QALY [38,023 United States dollars {USD}/QALY]). The base-case results demonstrated that the incremental costs would be reduced for all biologics, and decreases in incremental QALYs were observed for all biologics other than adalimumab. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was found to be dominant for adalimumab; for the other biologics, it was found to be less costly and less efficacious. The efficiency frontier on the cost-effectiveness plane indicated that tofacitinib–infliximab and infliximab–tofacitinib were more cost-effective than the other treatment patterns. When infliximab–tofacitinib was compared with tofacitinib–infliximab, the ICER was 282,609,856 yen/QALY (2,149,157 USD/QALY) and the net monetary benefit (NMB) was −12,741,342 yen (−96,894 USD) with a threshold of 5,000,000 yen (38,023 USD) in Japan. Therefore, infliximab–tofacitinib was not acceptable by this threshold, and tofacitinib–infliximab was the cost-effective treatment pattern. Conclusion: The current analysis suggests that the treatment pattern including 1L tofacitinib is a cost-effective alternative to the biologics for patients with moderate-to-severe UC from a Japanese payer's perspective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory condition affecting any part of the gastrointestinal tract. Current therapies involve pharmacological efforts to dampen inflammation. Biologics are recommended for patients with steroid-dependent or steroid-refractory disease; however, little is known about current biologic use in real-world settings in Japan. Methods: This observational, longitudinal, cohort study utilized the Japan Medical Data Center (JMDC) database to analyze claims data of patients who were prescribed ≥1 biologic (adalimumab, infliximab, or ustekinumab) following a new CD diagnosis made between January 2009 and January 2019. We primarily assessed the type of first-line treatment prescribed within 6 months of a patient's first CD diagnosis. Results: Of the 1,346 eligible patients, the most common prescriptions were 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) monotherapy (26.8%), 5-ASA plus biologic combination (26.3%), and biologic monotherapy (12.9%). First-line biologics were prescribed within 6 months of initial CD diagnosis in 61.1% of patients, either alone or in combination with other therapies. As an individual first-line treatment, the proportion of patients receiving prescriptions of infliximab was high (66.3%) and steroids, low (1.3%). Patients who had a procedure to inspect the small intestine, such as endoscopy (n = 508), were mostly treated with a nonbiologic therapy (74.8%), whereas those who had not (n = 838), mostly received biologics (alone or in combination, 82.8%) as a first-line treatment. Conclusions: In this study, we discovered the typical treatment pattern of patients with CD who received biologics and are registered in the JMDC database in Japan. Biologics were commonly used in the early phase of CD treatment. Treatment with traditional approaches such as steroids and nutritional therapy with evaluation for small intestine lesions, before turning to the use of biologics, may be prudent for achieving optimal outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aim: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a rare extraintestinal manifestation of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Several studies from Western countries have reported that the severity of AP in patients with IBD is similar to that in the general population; however, its severity in patients from Eastern countries in the era of biologics remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the severity of AP in patients with IBD and the effect of biologics on the severity of AP using a nationwide database. Methods: We divided 1138 eligible AP admissions from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database system into IBD and non‐IBD groups after propensity score matching, and compared the severity of AP. We divided the IBD group into ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) subgroups and compared each with the non‐IBD group. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the clinical factors affecting acute pancreatitis. Results: IBD and UC groups had lower rate of severe AP compared to the non‐IBD group (13.7% vs 28.3%, P < 0.0001 and 11.0% vs 28.3%, P < 0.0001, respectively). There were no differences in the rates of severe AP between the CD and non‐IBD groups. Multivariate analysis showed that biologics did not affect the severity of AP. Conclusion: The severity of AP in patients with IBD may be lower than that in the general population; biologics for IBD may not worsen its severity. Further prospective studies are required to clarify the severity of AP in patients with IBD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Biologics have been used increasingly for the treatment of severe asthma. However, established guidelines for the selection, switching, or discontinuation of biologics do not exist. We aimed to identify the clinical characteristics of patients with asthma who required switching biologics and the factors associated with switching biologics. Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective study of 42 patients with severe asthma treated with biologics at the Hokkaido University Hospital between 23rd June 2016 and 30th April 2021, when two biologics were available in Japan. We compared the characteristics of subjects who continued and switched biologics. The time to switch the biologics was assessed by type 2 inflammatory biomarkers, pulmonary function indices, and the presence of comorbidities, including the Japanese Epidemiological Survey of Refractory Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis (JESREC) score and aspirin exacerbated respiratory diseases (AERD), using the Kaplan–Meier method and a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Eight and five patients were treated by mepolizumab and benralizumab at baseline, respectively among the 31% (13/42) who switched the biologics. Subjects who required switching biologics were characterized by high blood eosinophil counts, younger age, JESREC scores of 11 points or higher, and AERD. The time taken to switch biologics was significantly shorter in the subgroups with high JESREC scores (≥ 11) or AERD, compared with their counterparts with low JESREC scores or without AERD (both, P < 0.05). JESREC scores of ≥ 11, but not the presence of AERD, were associated with time to switch biologics. Conclusion: The presence of eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis based on JESREC scores of ≥ 11 and younger age were factors associated with switching biologics in asthma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Although the proportion of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) has increased steadily, the relationship between patient background and preference for bDMARDs has not been fully investigated. Methods: We conducted a web-based questionnaire survey among patients aged ≥ 20 years with RA receiving bDMARDs. Participants were recruited through an internet research company in Japan. Study endpoints included factors affecting the preferred bDMARD treatment mode, namely, in-hospital intravenous infusion (infusion), in-hospital subcutaneous injection (in-hospital injection), or self-administered subcutaneous injection (self-injection), and discrepancies between the current and preferred treatment mode. Results: Of the 400 patients surveyed for preferred treatment mode, 15.3% preferred infusion, 18.0% preferred in-hospital injection, and 66.8% preferred self-injection. A preference for infusion (odds ratio [OR] 2.218 and 6.165) and in-hospital injection (OR 4.735 and 6.026) versus self-injection was significantly associated with higher current frequency of hospital visits and anxiety or other hurdles related to self-injection. A flexible administration setting was significantly associated with a preference for self-injection versus infusion (OR 0.401) and versus in-hospital injection (OR 0.445). Further, age (< 40 vs. ≥ 60 years) was significantly associated with a preference for self-injection versus in-hospital injection (OR 0.120). Many patients reported no discrepancy between their current and preferred treatment mode (patients receiving infusion, 68.0%; in-hospital injection, 71.2%; and self-injection, 94.0%). However, > 90% of patients responded that they would change their current mode in the future following a recommendation by a medical professional, aging, or a change in RA symptoms. Conclusions: This web-based survey showed that patient preference for bDMARD treatment mode was significantly associated with age, frequency of hospital visits, flexible administration setting, and anxiety or other hurdles to self-injection. Changes in patient background which affect the preferred treatment mode should be considered in decision-making for RA therapy with bDMARDs. Trial registration: R000048089 (UMIN-CTR) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In Japan, biologic therapy was initiated for patients with severe asthma in 2009. In recent years, four biologics with different mechanisms of action have become available in the clinical setting. However, the efficacy of switching between biologics remains uncertain. Methods: To elucidate the efficacy of switching between biologics, 97 patients were enrolled who had received any biologic therapy for severe asthma at Jikei University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, from July 2009 to December 2020. We retrospectively examined the patient characteristics, biomarkers, pulmonary function test results, selected biologics, and efficacy. Results: Thirty-one males and 66 females received any biologics. The mean age was 53.3 years at the initiation of biologic therapy. Initially, 33, 41, 15 and eight patients received omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab, respectively. Among three representative indicators for biologics administration, the peripheral blood eosinophil count, serum IgE levels and fractional exhaled nitric oxide, 64% of the patients had two indicators, and 28% had three indicators. Thirty-four patients (35%) switched from the initial biologic to another, and the reasons for switching included persistent asthmatic symptoms (n=22), schedule of hospital visits (n=5), and other reasons. Thus, the treatment was effective in 11 patients after switching. In addition, two patients received combination therapy with different biologics. Eighteen patients (19%) interrupted treatment for various reasons. Regardless of whether the biologic was the initial therapy, the overall efficacy of the four biologics was 60% based on the global evaluation of treatment effectiveness. Conclusion: Switching between biologics can be a promising option for severe asthma patients in whom treatment with an initial biologic is ineffective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Vedolizumab (VDZ) was approved by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare in 2018 for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe active ulcerative colitis (UC). The comparative cost-effectiveness of VDZ compared with other biologics is unknown in Japan. This information could be useful for decision makers at the time of repricing biologics for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe UC.Objective: The aim was to assess the cost-effectiveness of VDZ versus other branded biologics for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe UC who were anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-naïve, from the Japanese public healthcare payer perspective.Methods: A hybrid decision tree/Markov model was developed to predict the number of patients who achieved response and remission at the end of the induction phase and sustained it during the maintenance phase, translating this into quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and costs. Treatment-related adverse events, discontinuation and surgery, and their impact on QALYs and costs were also modeled. A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis were conducted to estimate the comparative efficacy of each treatment versus placebo. Rates of adverse events, surgery, surgery complications, and utilities were from the literature. Costs (2018 Japanese yen) were obtained from the Japanese National Health Insurance drug price list and medical fee table and local claims databases. Clinical and economic outcomes were projected over a lifetime and discounted at 2% annually.Results: Over a lifetime, VDZ yielded greater QALYs and cost savings compared with golimumab and was cost-effective compared with adalimumab and infliximab (incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ¥4,821,940 and ¥4,687,692, respectively). Deterministic and probabilistic analyses supported the robustness of the findings in the base-case analysis, indicating that VDZ was either dominant or cost-effective in most scenarios and replications. The main limitations of this analysis include excluding tofacitinib and infliximab biosimilar as comparators, health-state utility estimates were obtained from population studies in the United Kingdom, and the impact of subsequent (i.e., second-line) biologic treatment was not evaluated.Conclusion: Our analysis suggests that VDZ is dominant or cost-effective compared with other branded biologics for the treatment of anti-TNF-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe UC in Japan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In Japan, more than five years have passed since emergence of the first three biologics, infliximab, adalimumab, and ustekinumab, became available in daily practice; however, no data for drug survival was reported from Japan. Objective: To study the long-term drug survival of infliximab, adalimumab, and ustekinumab used for Japanese psoriatic patients. Methods: We retrieved data on all patients treated with biological agents and calculated the long-term drug survival for infliximab, adalimumab, and ustekinumab using our psoriasis registry (Kurume Psoriasis Registry: KURUPR) consisted of 343 patients by the end of March 2017. We analyzed 103 treatment courses of 83 patients with all types of psoriasis, as well as 79 treatment courses of 62 patients with psoriasis vulgaris using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Drug survival was higher for ustekinumab than infliximab and adalimumab in both settings, although there were no statistical differences. Conclusions: Previous studies of long-term drug survival in patients with psoriasis vulgaris showed significantly higher drug survival for ustekinumab than infliximab, and adalimumab. Our data showed similar tendency. Besides randomized clinical trials, drug survival data is useful because it reflects real-world management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background:Biologics have been shown to improve the outcomes of patients with psoriasis but their cost is an issue. Objective:Determine the number needed to treat (NNT) to achieve a 75%/90% reduction in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI-75/90) and evaluate the incremental cost per PASI-75/90 responder (CPR) relative to placebo in Japan. Methods:A network meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the relative probabilities of achieving PASI-75/90 and NNTs. Drug costs were assessed based on Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Agency-approved dosing. The CPR was estimated for a short-term induction period and first year of treatment. Results:Compared with placebo, the PASI-75 NNT was 1.27 for adalimumab 80 mg, 1.29 for secukinumab 150 mg, 1.36 for secukinumab 300 mg, 1.57 for adalimumab 40 mg, 1.68 for ustekinumab 90 mg, 1.97 for ustekinumab 45 mg and 2.00 for infliximab 5 mg/kg. The short-term PASI-75 CPR relative to placebo was $5,062 for secukinumab 150 mg, $8209 for adalimumab 40 mg, $10,654 for secukinumab 300 mg, $11,754 for adalimumab 80 mg, $15,407 for ustekinumab 45 mg, $19,147 for infliximab 5 mg/kg and $26,257 for ustekinumab 90 mg. A similar ranking was observed for one-year PASI-75 CPRs and PASI-90 NNTs and CPRs. Conclusion:Adalimumab 40 mg/80 mg and secukinumab 150 mg/300 mg were the most efficacious and cost-efficient for patients with psoriasis in Japan. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Objectives: The objective of this study is to evaluate the economic impact of adalimumab (ADA) on Japanese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Methods: ANOUVEAU was a 48-week multicenter, prospective, observational, single-cohort study. Work-related outcomes including absenteeism, presenteeism, overall work impairment (OWI), and activity impairment (AI) were evaluated using the RA-related work productivity and activity impairment (WPAI/RA). The amount of productivity loss was estimated via multiplication of absenteeism, presenteeism and OWI by the national average occupational wage for paid worker (PW) and part time worker (PTW), and via multiplication of AI by the estimated wage for domestic work for home maker (HM). Results: In this analysis, 1196 patients were included. At week 48, measures of productivity loss due to absenteeism, presenteeism, OWI, and AI were significantly improved by administrating ADA to RA patients in all employment types (PW, PTW, and HM), compared to baseline (p<.01). Productivity loss of Japanese society by RA disease was estimated to be $9.80 billion. The annual decrease in productivity loss through ADA administration to Japanese RA patients was estimated to be $3.76 billion. Conclusions: The socioeconomic burden of RA is high, but ADA treatment may reduce productivity loss related to RA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The expiry of patents for costly biologics is creating new momentum on the pharmaceutical market for biosimilars (copies of off-patent biologics) and paving the way for their development. However, little is known about the competitiveness of biosimilars versus their originators and other biologics belonging to the same therapeutic class.Objective: The main goal of this study was to analyse the type of competition generated by the first biosimilars commercialised on key global biologic markets and to grasp their economic model. The secondary goal was to distinguish the main factors likely to influence the uptake of biosimilars on national markets.Methods: To be included in this study, countries had to meet three conditions: the regulatory framework for the development of biosimilars closely resembled that in Europe, biosimilars were marketed in 2014, and the value of the biologics market was >US$3 billion. We analysed granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (GCSFs) and erythropoietins (EPOs) over the period 2007-2014 because these are the two main therapeutic classes that have been 'biosimilarised' and thus have many years of experience available. We assessed market sizes, retail/hospital distribution mixes, incentives for using biosimilars and price discounts for originators versus biosimilars. We conducted a linear regression analysis to assess the relationship between uptakes of biosimilars and the market shares of other biologics.Results: The EU-5 (France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK) and Japanese GCSF and EPO markets are highly-country-specific. Uptake of biosimilars seems to depend on retail/hospital distribution mixes and on medical practice. Depending on the therapeutic class and the market sector (retail or hospital), biosimilars may compete with first-generation or second-generation products or both. Some incentives implemented to encourage the use of biosimilars had mixed results. Overall, discounts for biosimilars versus originators are not factors that determine global uptake of biosimilars.Conclusion: Unlike generics, there appears to be no unique economic model for biosimilars. Moreover, a new phenomenon occurs with biosimilars: sometimes, they are able to take market shares from subsequent generations of biologics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To investigate and compare the risk for malignancy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with biologics in Japan to the general population. Methods: Data for 14,440 patients from 335 institutions who were given infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, golimumab, tocilizumab, or abatacept were retrieved from the SafEty of biologics in Clinical Use in Japanese patients with RhEumatoid arthritis (SECURE) database. Results: We identified 333 incidents of malignancies in 320 patients during 49,320 patient-years (PY). The age- and sex-standardized incidence rate (ASR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) for overall malignancy of the SECURE cohort was 313.9/105 PY (271.4-361.3), and the standardized incidence rate ratio (SIR) (95% CI) was 0.745 (0.667-0.826). The ASR was decreased compared to the estimated incidence rate of malignancies in the Japanese general population (462.4/105 PY). The SIRs for site-specific nonhematopoietic malignancies of the SECURE cohort were not significantly elevated compared to the Japanese general population. A significant increase of SIR for malignant lymphoma (6.183, 95% CI, 4.809-7.643) was found in the SECURE cohort, similar to or slightly higher than the SIR previously reported from Japanese cohorts for RA patients. Conclusions: Continued vigilance with larger numbers of patients, longer observation periods, and inclusion of different biologics are recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To assess persistence rates of biologic agents for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in Japan. Methods: Based on Japanese claims data of 16,214 patients between 2012 and 2014, 6-, 12-, and 18-month persistence rates of different biologic agents were calculated. Determinants of persistence were assessed by means of a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model controlling for age, sex, and comorbidities. A sensitivity analysis was performed with different definitions of persistence and parametric survival analysis. Results: Overall persistence rates in Japan are high and reach 86% after 1 year in the entire sample. The persistence rate for the biologic-naïve subpopulation is above 95%. Persistence is higher for older patients (hazard ratio 0.60 [95% confidence interval 0.40-0.91] for >75 years compared to ⩽60 years) and lower for patients with a high comorbidity score (hazard ratio 1.33; 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.70 for Charlson Comorbidity Index score 3-5 compared to ⩽2). We found a high variation of persistence between different drugs. Conclusion: Japanese rheumatoid arthritis patients have a high persistence rate of biologic treatments. However, multiple factors affect the persistence rate of Japanese patients, including age, comorbidities, and patient type. Naïve patients tend to have a higher persistence rate than continuing biologic patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) biologics are effective in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA); however, it is still not clear whether this treatment promotes the development of malignancies such as lymphoma. Human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1), which is a causative agent of adult T-cell lymphoma (ATL), is prevalent in Japan. Many HTLV-1-positive patients with RA are assumed to exist; however, there have thus far been no reports on the effect of anti-TNF biologics on HTLV-1-positive patients. We analyzed the response to treatment with anti-TNF biologics and change of HTLV-1 markers in two cases of RA. The two cases showed no response based on the European League Against of Rheumatism response criteria 60 - 96 weeks after administration of anti-TNF biologics (infliximab and etanercept). No signs of ATL were observed and HTLV-1 markers, such as proviral load and clonality of HTLV-1-infected cells, showed no significant change in either of two cases. Therefore, treatment with anti-TNF biologics did not induce activation of HTLV-1, although the effect on RA was not as effective as in HTLV-1-negative patients in this limited study. Further long-term study with a greater number of patients is necessary to clarify the safety and efficacy of anti-TNF biologics in HTLV-1-positive patients with RA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate the influence of biologics on mortality and risk factors for death in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Methods: RA patients treated with at least one dose of biologics in daily practice in six large rheumatology institutes ('biologics cohort') were observed until 15 May 2010 or death, whichever occurred first. Mortality of the biologics cohort and the 'comparator cohort' (comprising patients among the IORRA cohort who had never been treated with biologics) was compared to that of the Japanese general population. Factors associated with mortality were assessed by a Cox model. Results: Among 2683 patients with 6913.0 patient-years of observation, 38 deaths were identified in the biologics cohort. The probability of death in patients lost to follow-up, calculated using the weighted standardized mortality ratio (SMR), was 1.08 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.77-1.47] in the biologics cohort and 1.28 (95 % CI 1.17-1.41) in the comparator cohort. Pulmonary involvement was the main cause of death (47.4 %), and the disease-specific SMR of pneumonia was 4.19 (95 % CI 1.81-8.25). Risk factors for death included male gender [hazard ratio (HR) 2.78 (95 % CI 1.24-6.22)], advanced age (HR 1.07, 95 % CI 1.03-1.11), and corticosteroid dose (HR 1.08, 95 % CI 1.01-1.17). Conclusion: Mortality in RA patients exposed to biologics did not exceed that in patients not exposed to biologics, but death from pulmonary manifestations was proportionally increased in RA patients exposed to biologics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents a study which characterized the three feline calicivirus (FCV) strains used in a trivalent inactive vaccine, Kyoto Biken Feline-CPR. These strains include the production strain of the previous vaccine and the strains screened from 60 field isolates obtained between 1998 and 2000. According to cross-neutralization tests, the three strains were antigenically different. The study concluded that the immunological and genetic properties of the three vaccine strains were different. Also noted is the potential of the Kyoto-Biken Feline-CPR vaccine to meet the antigenic diversity of FCVs spreading throughout Japan.

The aim of this study was to investigate changes in the treatment strategy of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and the prevalence of RA-related surgeries after approval of biologics in Japan and to analyze the impact of biologics on the incidence of orthopedic surgeries using a nationwide observational cohort database of rheumatic diseases [National Database of Rheumatic Diseases by iR-net in Japan (NinJa)]. The proportion of patients using biologics linearly increased from 2004 (1.8%) to 2007 (10.0%), but neither the number nor type of RA-related surgery significantly changed during this period. Patients treated with biologics exhibited relatively more severe disease activity and lower physical function. Among patients using biologics, those who underwent RA-related surgeries exhibited background characteristics of longer disease duration and worse physical function, while disease activity was not different from patients without surgery. These results suggest that the potential value of biologics in avoiding surgical procedure is limited in patients with severe functional disorders caused by long disease duration. Further investigation with a longer observation period is required to obtain more definite conclusions as to the impact of biologics usage on orthopedic surgeries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In Japan not only pharmaceutical companies but also authorities have finally acknowledged their responsibility for class-action suits concerning biologicals including non-heated concentrates contaminated with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), dried dura mater inducing Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (CJD) and fibrinogen contaminated with hepatitis C virus (HCV). Japan's yearly consumption of albumin in 1985 was 3.84 million l (800 kg/million person year). That is almost one quarter to one third of the world consumption and this was heavily criticized by other countries. Anti-HCV antibody was introduced for screening of blood as soon as it became available commercially in the late 1989s. The incidence of Post Transfusion Hepatitis (PTH) fell dramatically from about 10% to about 3% and to less than 1% after the second generation anti-HCV antibody was introduced for screening. After the out-of-court settlement of the suit concerning concentrates-induced HIV, two victims participated as members of a committee for the amendment of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Law, especially those paragraphs dealing with biologicals, which passed and was made known in 2002. According to the new Law, pharmaceutical companies have to discard, recall and stop selling a product when they know that it could induce harmful health problems. In the new Law bio-derived products are clearly defined and a pharmaceutical company is obliged to keep records of bio-derived products for at least 30 years after shipping them. Medical institutions are obliged to keep records of bio-derived products for at least 20 years after they used them. Blood is now strictly screened by 20 mini-pool Nucleic acid amplification technique (20MP NAT). However, there are still several problems regarding biologicals including: 1. A steady increase of newly approved biologicals. 2. Too easy approval of not only biopharmaceuticals but also devices. 3. A lack of strict regulation of clinical trials done by academia. 4. Questions of dosing of biologicals in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper presents new evidence on availability, use, and prices of biopharmaceuticals in five major European Union (EU) markets, Canada, Australia, Japan, and Mexico, relative to the United States. Our data set from IMS Health includes all product sales in 2005. Per capita spending on biopharmaceuticals was at least twice as high in the United States as in the other countries. This difference reflects primarily greater availability and use of new, relatively high-price molecules and formulations. Prices for identical formulations are not higher on average in the United States. The broader price indexes, which do not control formulation, are also not higher in the United States, after adjusting for income. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is little information regarding the use of biologics in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) patients in Japan. The aim of this study was to determine the factors associated with the use of biologics in the treatment of Japanese patients with IBD.Methods: An online survey was conducted among Japanese patients with IBD (n = 1035). Socioeconomic as well as treatment related information was collected. Logistic regression was applied to analyze the determinants of biologic treatment.Results: Younger age (≤ 40 years vs. > 65 years; OR:0.24), time since diagnosis (< 2 years vs. < 15 years; OR: 4.16), surgical history (OR:1.98) and visiting university hospitals (university hospitals vs. clinics; OR: 0.47) were associated with biologic treatment for Japanese IBD patients.Conclusions: Currently, biologics have been used in younger IBD patients which may give rise to the presence of an age bias in biologic treatment. Further studies are required to confirm these results and to define appropriate IBD patients who should be treated with biologic agent. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Sirukumab, a high-affinity human monoclonal antibody that selectively binds to interleukin-6, has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in global phase 1 and phase 2 studies. The present study evaluated the safety and efficacy of sirukumab, as monotherapy in Japanese patients with RA refractory to methotrexate or sulfasalazine., Methods: In this phase 3, double-blind study, 122 patients (age ≥ 20 years) were randomized (1:1, 61 patients in each arm) to sirukumab administered subcutaneously: 50 mg once every 4 weeks (q4w) or 100 mg once every 2 weeks (q2w) through 52 weeks. Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs were allowed after 24 weeks. Safety was assessed and efficacy was evaluated using American College of Rheumatology (ACR) responses, Disease Activity Score C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI)., Results: Amongst the 122 randomized patients, 99 (81.1%) patients completed the study. Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 114/122 (93.4%) patients and serious AEs were reported in 9/122 (7.4%) patients. No deaths, major cardiovascular AEs, serious gastrointestinal perforations or tuberculosis cases were reported during this study period. Grade 3 hematologic abnormalities (neutropenia and leukopenia) were reported in seven patients and no grade 4 abnormalities were observed. ACR20 responses were observed within 2 weeks, achieved in 47/61 (77.0%, 50 mg q4w) patients and 44/61 (72.1%, 100 mg q2w) patients at week 16 and maintained through week 52. ACR50/70, DAS28-CRP and HAQ-DI responses were also maintained through week 52 in both groups., Conclusions: Safety findings were comparable between the two treatment groups. The 52-week administration of sirukumab at 50 mg q4w and 100 mg q2w was generally tolerable and with measurable efficacy in Japanese patients with RA refractory to methotrexate and sulfasalazine., Trial Registration: NCT01689532 . Registered 18 September 2012.

Background and Aims: This survey aimed to compare actual lifestyle factors and QOL between Japanese IBD patients and healthy Japanese controls, by questionnaire using an internet-web system., Methods: Through the internet-web system, we asked 464 patients with Crohn's disease [CD], 360 patients with ulcerative colitis [UC], and 4100 healthy controls to answer a questionnaire including an eight-item short-form health survey [SF-8]. The survey was conducted until data had been accumulated from the predetermined numbers of patients [120 patients each with CD and UC] and healthy controls [240 subjects]., Results: QOL assessment by SF-8 revealed scores for six of the eight subscale items and the summary score for the mental component to be significantly lower in the CD and UC groups than in controls. There was a significant negative correlation between each SF-8 score and the degree of CD and UC symptoms. The marriage rate in adult patients was significantly lower in the CD than in the UC group or the controls. The mean annual income and the employment rate were significantly lower in the CD than in the UC group or the controls. CD patients receiving biologicals were more frequently satisfied with the efficacy of treatment than UC patients were with their treatment regimens [56% vs 29%]., Conclusions: Actual lifestyle factors and QOL appear to be impaired in Japanese patients with IBD, especially those with CD. The subjective efficacy of biologicals might be greater in CD than in UC., (Copyright © 2015 European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation (ECCO). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)