Search

The COVID-19 pandemic is putting a huge strain on the provision and continuity of care. The length of sickness absence of the healthcare workers as a result of SARS-CoV-2 infection plays a pivotal role in hospital staff management. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the timing of COVID-19 recovery and viral clearance, and its predictive factors, in a large sample of healthcare workers. This is a retrospective cohort study. The analysis was conducted on data collected during the hospital health surveillance programme for healthcare staff at the University Hospital of Verona; healthcare workers were tested for SARS-CoV-2 through RT-PCR with oronasopharyngeal swab samples. The health surveillance programme targeted healthcare workers who either had close contact with SARS-CoV-2–infected patients or were tested as part of the screening-based strategy implemented according to national and regional requirements. Recovery time was estimated from the first positive swab to two consecutive negative swabs, collected 24 h apart, using survival analysis for both right-censored and interval-censored data. Cox proportional hazard was used for multivariate analysis. During the health surveillance programme, 6455 healthcare workers were tested for SARS-CoV-2 and 248 (3.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.4–4.3) reported positive results; among those who tested positive, 49% were asymptomatic, with a median age of 39.8 years, which is significantly younger than symptomatic healthcare workers (48.2 years, P < 0.001). Screening tests as part of the health surveillance programme identified 31 (12.5%) of the positive cases. Median recovery time was 24 days (95% CI: 23–26) and 21.5 days (95% CI: 15.5–30.5) in right- and interval-censoring analysis, respectively, with no association with age, sex or presence of symptoms. Overall, 63% of participants required >20 days to test negative on two consecutive swabs. Hospitalised healthcare workers (4.8%) were older and had a significantly longer recovery time compared with non-hospitalised healthcare workers in both analyses (33.5 vs 24 days, P = 0.005). Recovery from COVID-19 and viral clearance may take a long time, especially in individuals who are hospitalised. To detect asymptomatic cases, screening programmes for healthcare workers is recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this study was to report recovery time, retirement rate, racing performance, and presence of compensation pattern after musculoskeletal injuries (MSIs) in Standardbred racehorses (STBRs). This is a retrospective single open-cohort study, enrolling 356 STBRs in training in a single racetrack. Musculoskeletal injury was defined as any training-related injury after which the horse did not train for at least 15 days. The first and second MSIs encountered during the horse's racing career were considered. Medical records, training logbooks, and racing data were reviewed to determine recovery time, retirement rate, racing performance, and compensation pattern after MSIs. Kaplan-Meier estimators considered the return to activity as primary endpoint. The hazard ratio (HR) for return to activity was determined using Cox proportional hazard models, after classifying horses based on the injury type. A total of 543 MSIs were considered. The 33.6% (95% confidence limits [CL]: 29.5, 37.8) of STBRs suffering from MSI had to be retired as consequence of that. The median recovery time after MSI was 119 days (95% CL: 47, 179). Horses with traumatic osteoarthritis had a greater likelihood of returning to athletic activity compared with horses with stress fractures (HR = 4.8, 95% CL: 3.5, 6.7) and tendon/ligament strains (HR = 4.1, 95% CL: 3.1, 5.4). Increased racing speed was recorded after injuries. The second MSI was more often localized to the contralateral limb compared with the first injury (odds ratio (OR) 6.35, 95% CL: 4.29, 8.51), diagonal (OR 4.59, 95% CL: 3.05, 6.27) and to the same limb (OR 3.17, 95% CL: 2.03, 4.47) than to the ipsilateral limb., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)