Search

Background: Hyperkalemia (HK) is frequently present in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Risk factors for HK among CKD patients include comorbidities and renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitor (RAASi) treatment. Current standard of care (SoC) often necessitates RAASi down-titration or discontinuation, resulting in poorer cardiorenal outcomes, hospitalization and mortality. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of patiromer for HK in CKD patients with and without heart failure (HF) in an Italian setting. Methods: A lifetime Markov cohort model was developed based on OPAL-HK to assess the health economic impact of patiromer therapy in comparison to SoC after accounting for the effects of HK and RAASi use on clinical events. Outcomes included accumulated clinical events, number needed to treat (NNT) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Subgroup analysis was conducted in CKD patients with and without HF. Results: Patiromer was associated with an incremental discounted cost of €4,660 and 0.194 quality adjusted life years (QALYs), yielding an ICER of €24,004. Per 1000 patients, patiromer treatment prevented 275 moderate/severe HK events, 54 major adverse cardiovascular event, 246 RAASi discontinuation and 213 RAASi up-titration/restart. Subgroup analysis showed patiromer was more effective in preventing clinical events in CKD patients with HF compared to those without; QALY gains were greater in CKD patients without HF versus those with HF (0.267 versus 0.092, respectively). Scenario analysis and sensitivity analysis results support base-case conclusions. Conclusion: Patiromer is associated with QALY gains in CKD patients with and without HF compared to SoC in Italy. Patiromer prevented HK events, enabled RAASi therapy maintenance and reduced cardiovascular event risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: The aims of this study were to evaluate if the risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality was higher in the presence of hyperkalaemia (HK) in patients with heart failure (HF) treated with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi), and to investigate in this cohort the increased risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality among HK patients with non-optimal adherence to RAASi therapy.Methods and Results: In this retrospective cohort study based on administrative databases of five Italian Local Health Units, all adult patients with a HF diagnosis between January 2010 and December 2017 were included only if they were prescribed RAASi therapy during the first 3 months after the index date, that corresponded to the date of first HF diagnosis during the inclusion period. Patients were considered to have HK if serum potassium level was ≥5.5 mmol/L. A propensity score matching was applied before evaluation of hazard ratios. Patients with HK were 37% (P < 0.001) and 70% (P < 0.001), respectively, more at risk of cardiovascular events and of dying for all-cause mortality compared to non-HK patients. Among the HK group, patients non-adherent to RAASi therapy had a 39% (P = 0.105) higher risk of cardiovascular events and a twofold increased risk (P < 0.001) of all-cause death.Conclusion: Findings from this real-world study showed that in a cohort of HF patients under RAASi therapy, subjects with HK had an enhanced risk of cardiovascular events or death compared to patients without HK. Moreover, in HK patients, sub-optimal adherence to RAASi therapy was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Systemic arterial hypertension (referred to as hypertension herein) is a major risk factor of mortality worldwide, and its importance is further emphasized in the context of the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection referred to as COVID-19. Patients with severe COVID-19 infections commonly are older and have a history of hypertension. Almost 75% of patients who have died in the pandemic in Italy had hypertension. This raised multiple questions regarding a more severe course of COVID-19 in relation to hypertension itself as well as its treatment with renin–angiotensin system (RAS) blockers, e.g. angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). We provide a critical review on the relationship of hypertension, RAS, and risk of lung injury. We demonstrate lack of sound evidence that hypertension per se is an independent risk factor for COVID-19. Interestingly, ACEIs and ARBs may be associated with lower incidence and/or improved outcome in patients with lower respiratory tract infections. We also review in detail the molecular mechanisms linking the RAS to lung damage and the potential clinical impact of treatment with RAS blockers in patients with COVID-19 and a high cardiovascular and renal risk. This is related to the role of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) for SARS-CoV-2 entry into cells, and expression of ACE2 in the lung, cardiovascular system, kidney, and other tissues. In summary, a critical review of available evidence does not support a deleterious effect of RAS blockers in COVID-19 infections. Therefore, there is currently no reason to discontinue RAS blockers in stable patients facing the COVID-19 pandemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A potential association between the use of angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) and angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and the risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) has not been well studied.Methods: We carried out a population-based case-control study in the Lombardy region of Italy. A total of 6272 case patients in whom infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was confirmed between February 21 and March 11, 2020, were matched to 30,759 beneficiaries of the Regional Health Service (controls) according to sex, age, and municipality of residence. Information about the use of selected drugs and patients' clinical profiles was obtained from regional databases of health care use. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for associations between drugs and infection, with adjustment for confounders, were estimated by means of logistic regression.Results: Among both case patients and controls, the mean (±SD) age was 68±13 years, and 37% were women. The use of ACE inhibitors and ARBs was more common among case patients than among controls, as was the use of other antihypertensive and non-antihypertensive drugs, and case patients had a worse clinical profile. Use of ARBs or ACE inhibitors did not show any association with Covid-19 among case patients overall (adjusted odds ratio, 0.95 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.86 to 1.05] for ARBs and 0.96 [95% CI, 0.87 to 1.07] for ACE inhibitors) or among patients who had a severe or fatal course of the disease (adjusted odds ratio, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.63 to 1.10] for ARBs and 0.91 [95% CI, 0.69 to 1.21] for ACE inhibitors), and no association between these variables was found according to sex.Conclusions: In this large, population-based study, the use of ACE inhibitors and ARBs was more frequent among patients with Covid-19 than among controls because of their higher prevalence of cardiovascular disease. However, there was no evidence that ACE inhibitors or ARBs affected the risk of COVID-19. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reply to the letter regarding the article 'Effects of hyperkalaemia and non-adherence to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor therapy in patients with heart failure in Italy: a propensity-matched study' Effects of hyperkalaemia and non-adherence to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor therapy in patients with heart failure in Italy: a propensity-matched study. We thank Dr. Moriyama and co-workers for the relevance they give to our study.1 As far as their concern that we only assessed non-adherence to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor (RAASi) therapy in an outpatient setting, but not in acute decompensation, we agree on this point. [Extracted from the article]

Letter regarding the article 'Effects of hyperkalaemia and non-adherence to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor therapy in patients with heart failure in Italy: a propensity-matched study' Effects of hyperkalaemia and non-adherence to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor therapy in patients with heart failure in Italy: a propensity-matched study. We read with great interest the paper by Volterrani I et al i .1 In this observational cohort of heart failure (HF) patients on renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi), patients with hyperkalaemia had an increased risk of cardiovascular events or death. [Extracted from the article]

Introduction: The addition of the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren is demonstrated to improve blood pressure (BP) control rate and reduce progression of organ damage in treated hypertensive patients in clinical trials with a relatively short follow-up period. Aim: The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of aliskiren as an add-on antihypertensive therapy in high-risk, treated, hypertensive patients, who were not controlled with concomitant treatment with at least two antihypertensive drugs under 'real-life' conditions, during a planned observation and treatment period of at least 12 months in Italy. Methods: Clinical data were derived from medical databases of treated, uncontrolled, hypertensive patients followed by specialized physicians operating in different clinical settings (hospital divisions or outpatient clinics) in Italy. Aliskiren was added to stable antihypertensive treatment, including at least two drug classes (independently of class or dosage) and unable to achieve BP control. Follow-up visits for measuring clinic BP levels and collecting data on drug safety and tolerability were planned at time intervals of 1, 6 and 12 months. At each predefined follow-up visit, aliskiren could be up-titrated from 150 to 300 mg daily if BP control was not achieved. Results: From May 2009 to June 2011, a total of 1186 treated, uncontrolled, hypertensive patients (46.3% female, aged 65.2 ± 11.7 years, mean duration of hypertension 13.2 ± 9.3 years, mean clinic BP levels 156.5 ± 15.9/90.3 ± 9.5mmHg) were enrolled. Systolic and diastolic BP levels were 141.1/82.4, 134.9/79.8 and 133.6/78.9 mmHg at 1-, 6- and 12-month follow-up visits, respectively (p < 0.0001 vs baseline for all comparisons). These effects were consistent in all predefined subgroups, including those with left ventricular hypertrophy, renal disease, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease or cerebrovascular disease. Reduced levels of microalbuminuria were also reported, without affecting other renal and electrolyte parameters. Overall, compliance to study medication was high (93.0%), with a very low proportion of patients experiencing adverse events leading to drug discontinuation (3.6%). Conclusions: In this observational, prospective, open-label, multicentre study, we reported the 12-month clinical effectiveness, safety and tolerability of adding aliskiren to treated, uncontrolled, hypertensive patients in a 'real-life' setting in Italy. This strategy leads to a significantly improved BP control rate and low incidence of drug-related side effects or discontinuations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents abstracts from the XIV Conference on the Renin-Angiotensin System which include the angiotensin receptor blockers and atrial fibrillation, genetic aspects of cardiomyopathies and new hypertension guidelines.

Antihypertensive therapy has been demonstrated to significantly reduce cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality in randomized controlled clinical trials. In the past, however, doubts have been raised on the safety of one class of blood pressure lowering drugs, namely the angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists (angiotensin receptor blockers [ARBs]), in terms of increased risk of myocardial infarction. Several comprehensive meta-analyses have definitely demonstrated no significant increased risk of myocardial infarction in patients treated with ARBs compared with placebo or any other active treatments. More recently, a partial meta-analysis has suggested a potential link between the use of this drug class and an increased risk of cancer. Although a further comprehensive network meta-analysis demonstrated the lack of any increased risk of cancer development or cancer mortality in patients treated with different antihypertensive drug classes, including ARBs, compared with placebo, this report has generated claims and uncertainties in the medical community and produced a vast echo in the lay press. The biological plausibility, the potential pathophysiological mechanisms, and the clinical evidence that rule out such hypotheses are discussed here. The present article, which represents a position paper of the Italian Society of Hypertension (SIIA), states that the benefits derived from the use of ARBs outweigh the potential risks, and that the use of these drugs should be maintained according to present indications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the papers presented at the XI Forum on Renin-Angiotensin System held in Capri, Italy from April 11 to 12, 2008. The topics of the papers include cardiovascular and renal effects of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy, the role of renin-angiotensin system in the interaction between lipid abnormalities and hypertension, and macrovascular disease in diabetes mellitus. Michel Azizi, Claudio Borghi and Antonio Coca are among the authors of the papers.

The article focuses on papers discussed at the X Forum on the Renin-Angiotensin System held in Capri, Italy in April 2007. It notes the use of glitazones as insulin sensitizers in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. It mentions the role of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) in the development of all major cardiovascular diseases. It cites the approach taken by researchers to gain insights into the molecular function of a human renin/prorenin receptor (RER).

Background: The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is involved in the cardiovascular homeostasis as shown by previous studies reporting a positive association between specific RAAS genotypes and an increased risk of myocardial infarction. Anyhow the prognostic role in a long-term follow-up has not been yet investigated. Aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of the most studied RAAS genetic Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) on the occurrence and the long-term prognosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at young age in an Italian population. Methods: The study population consisted of 201 patients and 201 controls, matched for age and sex (mean age 40 ± 4 years; 90.5% males). The most frequent conventional risk factors were smoke (p < 0.001), family history for coronary artery diseases (p < 0.001), hypercholesterolemia (p = 0.001) and hypertension (p = 0.002). The tested genetic polymorphisms were angiotensin converting enzyme insertion/deletion (ACE I/D), angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AGTR1) A1166C and aldosterone synthase (CYP11B2) C-344T. Considering a long-term follow-up (9 ± 4 years) we compared genetic polymorphisms of patients with and without events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, revascularization procedures). Results: We found a borderline significant association of occurrence of AMI with the ACE D/I polymorphism (DD genotype, 42% in cases vs 31% in controls; p = 0.056). DD genotype remained statistically involved in the incidence of AMI also after adjustment for clinical confounders. On the other hand, during the 9-year follow-up (65 events, including 13 deaths) we found a role concerning the AGTR1: the AC heterozygous resulted more represented in the event group (p = 0.016) even if not independent from clinical confounders. Anyhow the Kaplan-Meier event free curves seem to confirm the unfavourable role of this polymorphism. Conclusion: Polymorphisms in RAAS genes can be important in the onset of a first AMI in young patients (ACE, CYP11B2 polymorphisms), but not in the disease progression after a long follow-up period. Larger collaborative studies are needed to confirm these results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]