Search

The impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main distal bifurcation lesions in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) is not fully understood in drug eluting stent era. We identified 512 consecutive DM patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main distal bifurcation lesions at New Tokyo Hospital, San Raffaele Scientific Institute and EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus between January 2005 and December 2015. We analyzed according to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Each group was defined as follows; no CKD (60 ≤ eGFR), mild CKD (45 ≤ eGFR < 60), moderate CKD (30 ≤ eGFR < 45), and severe CKD (15 ≤ eGFR < 30). The primary end point was target lesion failure (TLF) at 3 years. TLF was defined as a composite of cardiac death, target lesion revascularization, and myocardial infarction. The rate of TLF was significantly higher in the severe CKD group than that in the other groups (Adjusted HR of severe CKD relative to the others 3.64, [1.86 to 7.11], p < 0.001). Cardiac mortality was significantly higher in the severe CKD group than that in the other groups (Adjusted HR of severe CKD relative to the others 6.43, [2.19 to 18.9], p = 0.001). Target lesion revascularization rate was comparable in 4 groups (Adjusted HR of severe CKD relative to the others 1.71, [0.60 to 4.82], p = 0.31). In conclusions, in DM patients, those with severe CKD was extremely associated with worse clinical outcomes., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To compare the clinical outcomes following unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of ostial/midshaft lesions between first and new generation drug-eluting stents (DES)., Background: Clinical outcomes after treatment of ostial/midshaft lesions in ULMCA with first generation DES were favorable. However, to date, data regarding treatment for those lesion subsets with new generation DES have not been reported., Methods: A total of 219 patients with ostial/midshaft lesions in ULMCA treated with first (n = 139) or new generation DES (n = 80) were analyzed., Results: There was a higher prevalence of IVUS use (35.2% vs. 50.0%, P = 0.032) and postdilation (70.5% vs. 93.8%, P < 0.001) with larger maximum balloon diameter (3.81 ± 0.45 vs. 4.08 ± 0.44, P < 0.001) in the new generation DES group. At a median follow-up period of 730 days, there were no significant differences in the propensity-score adjusted analyses, for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as composite endpoint of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization (hazard ratio (HR) [new vs. first generation DES]: 1.22; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.64-2.31; P = 0.549). Of note, target lesion revascularization rates at 2-years were only 0.9% and 2.7%, for first and new generation DES groups, respectively (P = 0.339). On multivariable analysis, SYNTAX score (HR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.02-1.11, P = 0.006) and European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (HR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.00-1.31, P = 0.051) were independent predictors for MACE., Conclusions: This study suggests that new generation DES for ostial/midshaft lesions in ULMCA are associated with favorable clinical outcomes, similar to those observed with first generation DES., (© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Unprotected distal left main trifurcation (ULMT) lesion represents a challenge for interventional cardiologists with the potential for peri-procedural complications and adverse events at follow-up especially when the main branch and the side branches are concomitantly diseased., Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on consecutive patients with ULMT stenosis who electively underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in order to assess the technical feasibility and long-term outcomes according to the disease distribution in the trifurcation branches (true vs. non-true ULMT). Primary endpoint of the study was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as cardiac-death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR) during follow-up., Results: Eighty-four patients underwent PCI with DES for ULMT disease during the study period (40 true trifurcation and 44 non-true trifurcation). Angiographic and procedural success were obtained in 94% and 92.8% of cases. At 3-years follow-up, the occurrence of MACE was significantly higher in patients with true ULMT than in those with non-true ULMT (HR 2.801 [confidence interval; CI 1.164-7.896], P = 0.025) due to a higher TLR rate (HR 3.032 [CI 1.164-7.896], P = 0.023). No episodes of late and very late definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST) occurred. On multivariable analysis, a true-ULMT lesion was the only independent predictor of MACE (HR 2.344 [C.I. 1.006-5.461], P = 0.049)., Conclusions: PCI with DES for ULMT stenosis is feasible with a high procedural success rate and no definite/probable ST reported at follow-up. A true trifurcation lesion is associated with enhanced risk of MACE mainly driven by TLR., (Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Few data are available regarding the optimal revascularization strategy for unprotected distal left main coronary artery (UDLM) in-stent restenosis (ISR)., Methods and Results: Between April 2002 and December 2008, UDLM-ISR following drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation occurred in 92 of 474 patients (19.4%). Of these, 8 (8.7%) who underwent a coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) were excluded, and the remaining 84 (91.3%) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (43 plain old balloon angioplasty [POBA] and 41 DES) were analyzed to assess the feasibility of PCI for UDLM-ISR. The overall cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and major adverse cardiac events during the follow-up period (median, 24 months) occurred in 4, 2, and 31 patients, respectively. Repeat target lesion revascularization (TLR) occurred in 28 patients. The incidence of repeat TLR was higher following PCI with POBA than with DES (hazard ratio [HR], 2.79; 95% CI, 1.23-6.34; P=0.014). On Cox regression analysis, the independent predictors of repeat TLR were treatment with POBA (HR, 3.29; 95% CI, 1.41-7.69; P=0.006) and EuroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation) >6 (HR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.02-6.28; P=0.045). More complex lesions requiring a 2-stent strategy were associated with a higher occurrence of TLR for restenosis of the left circumflex coronary artery ostium (LCX-ISR) (HR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.59-3.97; P=0.001) as well as repeat TLR for recurrent LCX-ISR (HR, 4.32; 95% CI, 0.97-19.20; P=0.05) compared to a 1-stent strategy. No cardiac death at 2 years occurred in patients with LCX-ISR., Conclusions: UDLM restenosis is better treated with DES than with POBA. The rate of recurrent ISR following repeat PCI was high, whereas the rates of MI and death were relatively low. Complex lesions requiring a 2-stent strategy had a higher recurrence rate at the ostial LCX but without an associated increased risk of MI and death.