Search

Background and Aim: Appropriate end of life (EOL) management in Internal Medicine wards is challanging. The aim of this study was to analyze the burden of an educational program on EOL management in a Internal Medicine ward. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analysed characteristics and management of patients consecutively died in an italian Internal Medicine ward along one year. We compared demographic, co-morbidity, pharmacological treatment in the last 48-hours of life and procedures during hospital stay in patients died six months before and after an educational program on palliative cares and EOL management addressed to a team of physicians and nurses., Results: Study population was composed by 354 patients (190 females), with mean age ± DS 83.5 ± 10.6 years, one half admitted after the educational program. Eighty-four percent of deaths was exepected in the last 48 hours before exitus. Demographic characteristics and causes of hospitalization were not different before and after educational program. After the educational program the sharing of palliative care program with patient, relatives and/or caregivers (97.7% vs 85.8%, p=0.0001) and written order to withdrawal vital parameters relevation (39.5% vs 22%, p=0.0005) significantly increased, while difference in pharmacological classes prescribed in the last 48 hours of life was not find. Blood (54.8% vs 67.2%, p=0.0219) and arterial gas analysis (28.8% vs 39.5%, p=0.0435) samples in the last 48 hours of life were significantly reduced. Radiological and/or endoscopic examinations, red cells or platelets transfusion were reduced and palliative therapy was increased, despite difference between the two periods was not statistically significant., Conclusion: Educational program in Internal Medicine wards aimed to improve skills could contribute to make EOL management more appropriate and patient-oriented and it should be strongly encour-aged.

A consensus document on early palliative care was produced by a committed Working Group of the Italian Society of Medical Oncology and the Italian Society of Palliative Care to improve the early integration of palliative care in medical oncology and to stimulate and guide the choices of those who daily face the problems of advanced stage cancer patients. The simultaneous administration of antineoplastic treatments and early palliative care was shown to be beneficial in metastatic cancer pathway outcomes. Patients who could benefit from early palliative care are those with an advanced cancer at presentation, a compromised PS for cancer, and/or morbidities, and who are too frail to receive treatment. According to the Bruera practice models, in which the combination of cancer management with early palliative care can be offered, three groups of patients needing simultaneous care were identified and three different models of the delivery of palliative care were proposed. In patients with good prognosis and low need of simultaneous care, the solo practice model and the request for consultations were suggested, while in patients with poor prognosis disease with high need of simultaneous care and in conditions with high need of simultaneous care, regardless of cancer prognosis, the integrated care approach should be offered. Palliative care consultation services are seldom accessible in the majority of Italian hospitals; thus the application of various practice models depends on available resources, and a shared care model with the structures of palliative care operating in the area is often required.

Background: There is an increasing requirement to assess outcomes, but few measures have been tested for advanced medical illness. We aimed to test the validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Palliative care Outcome Scale (POS), and to analyse predictors of change after the transition to palliative care., Methods: Phase 1: multicentre, mixed method study comprising cognitive and qualitative interviews with patients and staff, cultural refinement and adaption. Phase 2: consecutive cancer patients on admission to 8 inpatient hospices and 7 home-based teams were asked to complete the POS, the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL and the FACIT-Sp (T0), to assess internal consistency, convergent and divergent validity. After 6 days (T1) patients and staff completed the POS to assess responsiveness to change (T1-T0), and agreement between self-assessed POS and POS completed by the staff. Finally, we asked hospices an assessment 24-48 h after T1 to assess its reliability (test re-test analysis)., Results: Phase I: 209 completed POS questionnaires and 29 cognitive interviews were assessed, revisions made and one item substituted. Phase II: 295 consecutive patients admitted to 15 PCTs were approached, 175 (59.3 %) were eligible, and 150 (85.7 %) consented. Consent was limited by the severity of illness in 40 % patients. We found good convergent validity, with strong and moderate correlations (r ranged 0.5-0.8) between similar items from the POS, the QLQ-C15-PAL and the FACIT-Sp. As hypothesised, the physical function subscale of QLQ-C15-PAL was not correlated with any POS item (r ranged -0.16-0.02). We found acceptable to good test re-test reliability in both versions for 6 items. We found significant clinical improvements during the first week of palliative care in 7/10 items assessed-pain, other symptoms, patient and family anxiety, information, feeling at peace and wasted time., Conclusions: Both the patient self-assessed and professional POS versions are valid and with an acceptable internal consistency. POS detected significant clinical improvements during palliative care, at a time when patients are usually expected to deteriorate. These results suggest that there is room for substantial improvement in the management of patients with advanced disease, across all key domains-symptoms, psychological, information, social and spiritual.

Purpose: Palliative sedation (PS) has been defined as the use of sedative medications to relieve intolerable suffering from refractory symptoms by a reduction in patient consciousness. It is sometimes necessary in end-of-life care when patients present refractory symptoms. We investigated PS for refractory symptoms in different hospice casemixes in order to (1) assess clinical decision-making, (2) monitor the practice of PS, and (3) examine the impact of PS on survival., Methods: This observational longitudinal cohort study was conducted over a period of 9 months on 327 patients consecutively admitted to two 11-bed Italian hospices (A and B) with different casemixes in terms of median patient age (hospice A, 66 years vs. hospice B, 73 years; P = 0.005), mean duration of hospice stay (hospice A, 13.5 days vs. hospice B, 18.3 days; P = 0.005), and death rate (hospice A, 57.2% vs. hospice B, 89.9%; P < 0.0001). PS was monitored using the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS). Sedated patients constituted 22% of the total admissions and 31.9% of deceased patients, which did not prove to be significantly different in the two hospices after adjustment for casemix., Results: Patient involvement in clinical decision-making about sedation was significantly higher in hospice B (59.3% vs. 24.4%; P = 0.007). Family involvement was 100% in both hospices. The maximum level of sedation (RASS, -5) was necessary in only 58.3% of sedated patients. Average duration of sedation was similar in the two hospices (32.2 h [range, 2.5-253.0]). Overall survival in sedated and nonsedated patients was superimposable, with a trend in favor of sedated patients., Conclusions: PS represents a highly reproducible clinical intervention with its own indications, assessment methodologies, procedures, and results. It does not have a detrimental effect on survival.

The capability to make decisions about one's own dying and death is commonly considered a necessary component of a good death, but difficulties in communicating about imminent death have been documented. This paper attempts to describe the process of constructing an instrument to elicit individual preferences concerning dying, while respecting the patient's awareness, and to verify its applicability in a palliative care setting. The development of the End-of-Life Preferences Interview (ELPI) was performed through (a) a literature search aimed at identifying relevant issues; (b) examination by a panel of experts in the field of palliative care of the items generated; and (c) pretesting of feasibility on all eligible consecutive patients referred to three centers of palliative care during a two-month period. The final version of the ELPI consisted of two parts: The first level explores preferences about issues regarding the caregiving process, and the second level focuses on preparation for death. Each of the two parts is introduced by key questions aimed at allowing the patient to decide whether and when to stop exploring such sensitive matters. Among the 49 eligible patients (41%), the interview was proposed to only 13 of them (27%), and only one of them refused. The reasons for such a low compliance of physicians in proposing the ELPI were evaluated by a semi-structured interview and are herein discussed. The use of the ELPI in clinical practice can favor the passage to a greater consideration of the self-determination of the patient at the end of life, with due consideration of his or her cultural and emotional needs.

Aim: The aim of this paper was to describe the frequency and the characteristics of continuous deep sedation in terminally ill patients., Methods: All patients who died in home palliative care units in the Florence area between March 1-December 31, 2000 and July 1, 2003-June 30, 2004 were prospectively analysed with regard to social, demographic, and clinical characteristics., Results: The data presented refer to 1075 patients (331 in 2000 and 744 in 2003-2004). Continuous deep sedation was applied in 14.2% and in 12% of patients, respectively. At baseline, patients who were sedated during the final stages of their life were more likely to be younger in age, to have poorer quality of life and better performance status. Such characteristics did not differ between the two periods. Hydration was not performed in 65% of all patients who finally received sedation in the period 2003-2004 versus 33% in those who did in 2000. In 2003-2004, the decision to use sedation was discussed with patients in 39% of those who were sedated. In 2003-2004, we noticed an increase in the use of benzodiazepines for continuous deep sedation from 43% to 87%. The increase in opioid average dosage from the onset of sedation until the last 24 h of their life was about seven-fold in 2000 and almost twice that amount in 2003-2004 in those patients who were not undergoing treatment with opioids when sedation started., Conclusion: The monitoring of end-of-life decision making and of medical practices involved in continuous deep sedation contributes to an enhancement in the quality of caring for terminally ill patients.

In the palliative care setting, the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) was developed for use in daily symptom assessment of palliative care patients. ESAS considers the presence and severity of nine symptoms common in cancer patients: pain, tiredness, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, appetite, well-being and shortness of breath plus an optional tenth symptom, which can be added by the patient. The aim of this study was to validate the Italian version of ESAS and to evaluate an easy quality of life monitoring system that uses a patient's self-rating symptom assessment in two different palliative care settings: in-patients and home patients. Eighty-three in-patients and 158 home care patients were enrolled. In the latter group, the Italian validated version of the Symptom Distress Scale (SDS) was also administered at the admission of the patients. The two groups of patients have similar median survival, demographic and clinical characteristics, symptom prevalence and overall distress score at baseline. ESAS shows a good concurrent validity with respect to SDS. The correlation between the physical items of ESAS and SDS was shown to be higher than the correlation between the psychological items. The association of ESAS scores and performance status (PS) showed a trend: the higher the symptom score was, the worse was the PS level. Test-retest evaluation, applied in the in-patient group, showed good agreement for depression, well-being and overall distress and a moderate agreement for all the other items. In conclusion, ESAS can be considered a valid, reliable and feasible instrument for physical symptom assessment in routine "palliative care" clinical practice with a potentially different responsiveness in different situations or care settings.

Objective: To estimate the reduction of time spent in hospital obtained through palliative home care., Methods: Retrospective analysis of the hospital admissions occurred during the last year of life. Cancer patients who were resident in the province of Florence, were registered at the Tuscan Cancer Registry, and died during the year 1997 were included in the study. Three palliative home care services were operating in the study area in 1997., Main Results: 3423 cancer patients died in the study area during 1997. 9.2% of them received palliative home care. Palliative home care was effective in reducing the utilization of hospital care during the last three months of life. A 25% reduction of the relative risk (CI: 34-14%) to have in-patient admissions and a 49% reduction of relative risk (CI: 52-47%) of spending days in the hospital during the last 3 months of life were estimated through multivariable regression models., Conclusions: Palliative home care was effective in reducing time spent in hospital during the last 3 months of life.