Search

Stroke has a greater effect on women than men owing to the fact that women have more stroke events and are less likely to recover. Age-specific stroke rates are higher in men; however, because of women's longer life expectancy and the much higher incidence of stroke at older ages, women have more stroke events than men overall. The aims of this prospective study in consecutive patients were to assess whether there are gender differences in stroke risk factors, treatment or outcome. Consecutive patients with ischemic stroke were included in this prospective study at four study centers. Disability was assessed using a modified Rankin Scale score (>or=3 indicating disabling stroke) in both genders at 90 days. Outcomes and risk factors in both genders were compared using the chi(2) test. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify any independent predictors of outcome. A total of 1136 patients were included in this study; of these, 494 (46%) were female. Women were statistically older compared with men: 76.02 (+/- 12.93) and 72.68 (+/- 13.27) median years of age, respectively. At admission, females had higher NIH Stroke Scale scores compared with males (9.4 [+/- 6.94] vs 7.6 [+/- 6.28] for men; p = 0.0018). Furthermore, females tended to have more cardioembolic strokes (153 [30%] vs 147 [23%] for men; p = 0.004). Males had lacunar and atherosclerotic strokes more often (146 [29%] vs 249 [39%] for men; p = 0.002, and 68 [13%] vs 123 [19%] for men; p = 0.01, respectively). The mean modified Rankin Scale score at 3 months was also significantly different between genders, at 2.5 (+/- 2.05) for women and 2.1 (+/- 2.02) for men (p = 0.003). However, at multivariate analysis, female gender was not an indicator for negative outcome. It was concluded that female gender was not an independent factor for negative outcome. In addition, both genders demonstrated different stroke pathophysiologies. These findings should be taken into account when diagnostic workup and treatment are being planned.

Background: Data on the correlation between blood pressure (BP) on admission and clinical outcome in patients with acute stroke are conflicting. The aims of the present study in consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke were to evaluate: (a) the relationship between systolic or diastolic BP on admission and mortality at 3 months; (b) the role of carotid artery disease ipsilateral to the index stroke on this relationship., Methods: Consecutive patients admitted to four Italian hospitals with objectively diagnosed ischemic stroke were included in this prospective study., Results: A total of 1467 patients (mean age 72.6+/-13.2 years; males 53.3%) with acute ischemic stroke were evaluated. At 3 months, 13 patients were lost at follow-up and 133 had died (9.2%). In patients with systolic BP <140mmHg, mortality was 11% (40/362), in patients with systolic BP between 140 and 179mmHg 8.3% (68/823) and in patients with systolic BP >or=180mmHg 9.2% (25/269). Patients with systolic BP <140mmHg were more likely to die within 90 days (OR 3.4; 95% CI 1.4-8.5, p=0.008, after adjusting for other risk factors) when compared to those with systolic BP between 140 and 179mmHg (reference group with OR=1.0). Systolic BP >or=180mmHg was not associated with increased mortality (OR 0.4; 95% CI 0.1-1.3, p=0.13). Two-hundred and thirty patients out of 1278 with anterior circulation stroke had a stenosis (>or=50% on ultrasonography) or an occlusion of the internal carotid ipsilateral to the index stroke. At 3 months, 29 patients had died (12.7%). In patients with systolic BP <140mmHg, mortality was 20.4% (11/54), in those with systolic BP between 140 and 179mmHg 13.0% (16/123) and in those with systolic BP >or=180mmHg 3.9% (2/51). Patients with systolic BP >or=180mmHg were less likely to die within 90 days (OR 0.1; 95% CI 0.0-0.5, p=0.022 after adjusting for other risk factors) compared to those with systolic BP between 140 and 179mmHg. Systolic BP <140mmHg was not associated with increased mortality (OR 6.3; 95% CI 0.8-48.0, p=0.08)., Conclusions: In the overall population, low BP was an independent risk factor for mortality. In patients with stenosis >/=50% or occlusion of the carotid ipsilateral to the index stroke, high BP was associated with a lower mortality at 3 months.

Objective: Small-vessel disease is the most frequent cause of lacunar stroke. The aims of this study were to evaluate: 1) alternative causes of lacunar stroke other than small-vessel disease; 2) functional outcome of lacunar strokes due to small vessel disease compared to lacunar strokes due to alternative causes., Methods: Consecutive patients with first-ever ischemic lacunar stroke were prospectively followed-up for at least 3 months. At discharge patients were divided into 2 groups: lacunar stroke due to small vessel disease (L-SVD) and lacunar stroke due to possible other etiologies (L-non SVD) (e. g. cardioembolism, atherosclerosis or other causes). Main outcome measures were the combined end point of death or disability (mRS >or= 3) and recurrent stroke at the end of follow-up., Results: 535 patients with acute stroke were seen during the study period. Out of these, 196 patients (126 males) with a mean age of 71.6 years (SD = 10) had lacunar stroke. L-SVD was seen in 142 patients (72.4 %) and L-nonSVD in 54 patients (27.6 %). After 16.4 months, 12 patients had died (6.2%; annual mortality rate 4.4 %), 63 were disabled (32.5 %) and 27 had stroke recurrence (13.9%; annual recurrence rate 9.9 %). Forty-nine patients with L-SVD (34.7 %) and 26 with L-nonSVD (49%) had died or become disabled. Sixteen patients with L-SVD (11.3 %) and 11 with L-nonSVD (20.4 %) had stroke recurrence. On multivariate analysis, L-nonSVD (OR = 2.87, 95% CI 1.08-7.65; p = 0.034) and age (OR = 1.07, 95 % CI 1.02-1.12; p = 0.01) were associated to more severe outcome. L-nonSVD was independently associated with recurrence (OR = 5.03, 95% CI 1.54-16.44; p = 0.006)., Conclusions: Twenty-seven percent of patients with lacunar stroke have causes other than small vessel disease. These patients have a severe outcome in terms of recurrence,mortality or disability. These findings support the need for a comprehensive diagnostic work-up for patients with lacunar stroke.