Search

Discusses the role of humanities in medicine at the San Luigi Medical School, University of Turin, Italy. Patient-physical relationship; Interactive teaching sessions dedicated to practical aspects of nephrology, dialysis and transplantation; Assessment of medical students' views about the pilot experience in nephrology.

Organ shortage for transplantation has focused attention on educational interventions. Italy is a nonhomogenous country whose cultural and economic differences are reflected in the health-care system: dialysis is mainly public in the north versus private in the south; and transplantation rates display a wide range from 3.4 to 37.8 per million people in 2002.The aim of the present study was to analyze the opinions of population of high school students (last two years) in two large cities: northern (Torino) and southern (Napoli) Italy, as a knowledge base for a randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of educational interventions on renal replacement therapy and organ donation, targeted to high school students.: MethodsThis preliminary study included eight public high schools that completed a first and anonymous semistructured questionnaire. Five hundred and eighty nine questionnaires were retrieved in Torino and 539 in Napoli. In both cities most students answered that they would give a kidney to a brother, sister, or partner needing dialysis (Torino: yes 80.6%; no 2.2%, uncertain—blank 17.2%; Napoli: yes 86.1%, no 1.1%; uncertain—blank 12.8%). Only 36.3% of the students in Torino and 37.7% in Napoli answered that they would consent to organ donation, if they had to choose for a strict relative with brain death. Opposition was 28% in Torino and 23.7% in Napoli; 35.7% in Torino and 38.6% in Napoli were blank—uncertain. These data underline the need for detailed information on the opinions of the overall population as basis for tailored educational campaigns. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

: BackgroundThe attitude toward living donation varies widely in the world, for economic and cultural reasons. In Italy, as in other Mediterranean settings, the role of living kidney donation is minor.: AimTo analyze the reasons for this attitude, we gathered data in a general population sample of high school students in a large northern Italian industrial city (Torino, about 900,000 inhabitants).: MethodsSemistructured questionnaires (n = 1676), gathered in 2001 to 2002 in 14 high schools, in the context of an educational program on dialysis, renal transplantation, and organ donation, were analyzed presumably reflecting opinions gathered before the educational intervention.: ResultsMost students, in the case of a close relative or partner needing dialysis, answer that they would donate a kidney (yes: 78.2%, no: 2.9%, uncertain—blank: 18.9%); receiving a living donor kidney is felt as disturbing: only 57.5% of the students would accept it (no: 5.9%, uncertain—blank: 36.6%), mainly because of fear of long-term problems for the donor. Donation from an older to a younger person is seen more positively than vice versa.: ConclusionIn our settings, the attitude of the teenagers on living donation is positive; however, while “giving” is positively seen, the presence of unresolved fears is witnessed by the lower acceptance of the idea of “taking.” These data suggest to focus on the risks of kidney donation in educational campaigns and in patient-physician information. The positive attitude shared by the teenagers supports the working hypothesis that lack of information is one of the determinants of the low living donor transplantation rate in our area. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

While the costs of renal transplantation are lower than those of dialysis, little is known about the costs of managing the waiting list. We performed a cost analysis of admission and clinical management of a waiting list for renal and pancreas-kidney transplantation. Admission to the waiting list included (1) renal graft from cadaver: minimum cost Euros (€) 1784.56 for men < 55 years, maximum €2127.85 for women ≥ 55 years; (2) pancreas-kidney transplantation: minimum €2475.50 for men, maximum €2540.10 for women ≥ 35 years. Check of suitability state on waiting list after 2 and 5 years: minimum €1400.15 for men ≥ 55 years (check every 2 years), maximum €1467.07 for women ≥40, <55 years (every 5 years). The differences are related to the imaging techniques: from €43.90 (Doppler ultrasonography) to €283.28 (coronary angiography). Maintenance of the waiting list: minimum cost €1885.21 in the first year and €3187.02 in the (fifth year) for men < 55 years; maximum €2228.50 (first year) and €5116.70 (fifth year) for women ≥ 55 years. These results show different costs for recipients on the basis of sex and age ranges, due to the different requirements for imaging tests such as cardiac scintiscan at age ≥ 55 years) and economic charges that increase with age. Reduced waiting times allow lowered total costs. This evaluation allowed us to calculate for our region (Piemonte, Northern Italy), the management costs of the patients presently on our waiting list (369 patients at December 31, 2002) from preparation to transplantation as €959,179.18. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

: BackgroundInterest in the humanities in the medical school is growing; while several medical schools, mainly of Anglo-Saxon background, have developed dedicated courses, the experience in Italy is limited.: MethodsSince the academic year 2000 to 2001, a discussion of ethical problems was implemented in the nephrology course (fourth year of the Medical School of Torino, Italy; overall 6 years). In 2002 to 2003, a case entitled “Retransplantation of Multiple Organs (Prog Transplant 2002)” was discussed in 2 hours of small-group tutorial teaching: a boy received a renal graft at age 5, failed at age 7 due to recurrent glomerulonephritis, required a heart-kidney graft at age 11, and a second heart-kidney graft at 17. Student opinions were gathered by anonymous semistructured questionnaires at the beginning of the lessons as a basis for discussion.: ResultsFollowing the lessons all students returned the questionnaires (n = 104). In the absence of competition for allocation, retransplantation was approved by 76.2%, unacceptable for 1% (22.9% uncertain—blank). With a waiting list of 10 patients, the opinions changed: 32.4% approved transplantation, 6.7% didn''t approve it, 60.9% were uncertain. A theoretical categorization into deontological or utilitaristic approaches favored the first (41.9% vs 26.7%), with a high prevalence of blank—uncertain (31.5%); 21.9% of the students would change their opinion was that study head of the Transplant Department.: ConclusionEthical aspects of the medical profession have been discussed with interest by medical school students; the high prevalence of uncertain answers and requests to develop specific tools underline the importance of this educational approach. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

: AimOrgan shortage is a rate-limiting factor for transplantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of an educational program targeted to high school students on opinions concerning organ donation.: MethodsSixteen public high schools in Torino, Italy, were randomized (2001 to 2002) as interventions (n = 8) or controls (n = 8). Intervention was composed of first questionnaire, first lesson (one to two classes; 2 hours, by a trained nephrology fellow); second lesson (all classes together; coordinated by a nephrologist, with patients and trainees); second questionnaire. Control included questionnaires. Statistical analysis compared the opinions in the questionnaires after stratification for age, sex, and type of school.: ResultsFourteen schools completed the program (seven interventions: 937 first and 808 second questionnaires; controls: 739 and 659). Television (82.5%) and newspapers (43.2%) were the main sources of information; knowledge on renal transplantation (grafts feasible per patient, average duration) was low; only 12.2% of the students gave correct answers. The opinions on living donation were highly positive (76.8%) with no difference in control, intervention schools, first and second questionnaires, according to sex, age, or type of school. The opinions on cadaveric transplantation were affected by the educational intervention with a drop in negative answers (from 33.7% to 16%), with an increase in positive (from 31.5% to 42.9%) and in uncertain ones (from 34.8% to 41.1%) among the intervention schools; 98% of the students appreciated the program.: ConclusionThe positive effect on student opinions suggests the need to develop educational approaches as a part of our routine clinical work. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Kidney transplant recipients frequently suffer from skin infections and malignancies, due to the effects of long-term immunosuppressive therapy. Herein, a dermatological screening was performed to evaluate the relationship between risk factors, cutaneous tumours and other skin diseases in a group of 282 kidney transplant patients. Infectious diseases (16.7%) were the most frequent dermatological disorders, whereas cutaneous inflammatory and autoimmune diseases were relatively rare, probably due to an indirect therapeutic role of immunosuppressive regimens. Thirty patients experienced cutaneous side effects from immunosuppressants, mainly when receiving corticosteroids (p = 0.0372). We identified 99 patients (35.1%) who developed cutaneous tumours after transplantation. Cumulative tumour incidence was observed during long-term immunosuppressive therapy; no relationships were identified between skin cancer risk and single class of drug or combination regimens. When we evaluated the eventual relevance of other risk factors for skin cancers, we demonstrated a statistical significance in univariate analysis for male gender, more advanced age at transplantation, long duration of immunosuppressive regimens, no sunscreen usage, outdoor job, absence of cherry angiomas and presence of actinic keratoses (AKs). Age at transplantation (p = 0.0174), presence of AKs (p = 0.0005) and duration of immunosuppression (p = 0.0011) also confirmed their significance in multivariate analysis.

Background: "Social risk behaviors" are usually considered as contraindications for organ donation. The organ shortage, however, necessitates expansion of the donor pool. Reconsideration of the policy toward substance abusers may be important. Opinions of the overall population may be of use to define this cultural-sensitive issue., Methods: A semistructured questionnaire on organ donation, including opinions on drug use (cannabis and cocaine), was administered to various groups of the general public and caregivers: high school students (liceo classico: 59 students, median age 18 years; istituto tecnico: 108, age 17); first- and fourth-year medical school (77, age 19; 46, age 22); continuing medical education (44, age 32); third-year nursing school (31, age 23); "senior citizen university" (51, age 63)., Results: Cannabis use was mainly accepted for kidney donation (48.6% yes, 26.6% no, 29.8% uncertain/blank), but cocaine use was not (22.1% yes, 44.2% no, 33.7% uncertain/blank). In the univariate analysis, opinions differed according to age, sex, and belonging to the health care teams upon multivariate analysis being a member of the health care team was the strongest predictor of responses (P<.01)., Conclusion: It is difficult to define social risk behaviors. Since opinions are important for organ donation, further studies and discussion are needed to periodically analyze our policies.

Context: Organ shortage for transplantation is a crucial problem; educational interventions may increase donations and decrease opposition., Objective: To test the efficacy of an educational programme on opinions on organ transplantation and kidney donation., Design and Participants: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial: eight intervention and eight control schools were randomly selected from the 33 public schools that agreed to participate. Targets: students in the last 2 years of secondary school (17-18 years); seven schools per group completed the study. EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMME:, Intervention: first questionnaire (anonymous); 2 h lesson in each class; 2 h general session with patients and experts; second questionnaire., Control: questionnaires., Main Outcome Measures: Differences between questionnaires (comparative analysis); interest; satisfaction with the programme; (cross-sectional analysis)., Results: 1776 first, 1467 second questionnaires were retrieved. Living kidney donation: at baseline 78.8% of students would donate a kidney to a relative/friend in need. The answers were unaffected by type of school but depended on sex (females more prone to donate, P<0.001); the answers did not change after the lessons. Cadaveric kidney donation: baseline opinions were mixed (intervention schools: 31.5% yes, 33.7% no, 34.8% uncertain), depending on type of school (classical-scientific high schools more positive than technical institutes, P<0.001), sex (males more prone to donate, P<0.001). Answers on living and cadaveric donation were correlated (P<0.001). The educational intervention increased favourable (31.5 to 42.9%) and uncertain (34.8 to 41.1%) opinions and decreased negative ones (33.7 to 16%) (P<0.001)., Conclusions: Educational interventions are effective in increasing interest and improving opinions about cadaveric organ donation.

Aim: The aim of this study was to report on the validation of a role-playing approach, using play-back and theatre laboratory in the context of a continuing medical education (CME) course on predialysis and transplantation, to discuss the patient-physician relationship., Methods: The course was developed with the help of a theatre director. The role-playing 2-day course was designed to be highly interactive for a small group (15-20 participants), based on a core of case reports (dialysis, transplantation, and return to dialysis after graft failure). Two stages were included: play-back theatre in which experiences told by the participants were mimed by a group of actors, and theatre laboratory in which different aspects of voice and touch were explored. Opinions were gathered by an anonymous semistructured questionnaire completed by all participants., Results: The course obtained a high score from The Ministry of Health (14 credits, 1 per teaching hour). The opinions of the 18 participants were highly positive; all liked the courses. Sixteen of 18 asked to repeat the experience. The strong emotional involvement was an advantage for 15 of 18, sharing emotional aspects of the profession for 10 of 18, and usefulness in clarifying opinions on "dark sides" of our profession for 10 of 18., Conclusion: The positive opinions recorded during this experience, the first experiment with a "psycho-theatrical approach" developed in a CME course in our country, suggest the benefit of implementing nonconventional, educational approaches in a multidisciplinary discussion of the patient-physician relationship in transplantation medicine.

Background: Consent to therapy is increasingly requested in the form of ''informed consent''., Objective: To validate an evidence-based informed consent form for erythropoietin (EPO) therapy and to evaluate patient opinions about the informed consent approach., Methods: An evidence-based informed consent form was developed as part of the Evidence-Based-Medicine course at the Medical School of Turin, Italy. It was validated by anonymous questionnaires (0-10 analogical scales and open answers) administered to patients at different stages of CKD (19 pre-ESRD, 26 hemodialysis, 12 transplant patients) attending an outpatient unit of the University of Turin, to 8 nurses, and to 26 medical students., Results: All individuals filled in the questionnaire. Interest in a detailed explanation of the therapy was high (median 9), as was comprehension (median 9), with no differences between patients with regard to disease stage (pre-ESRD vs. RRT) or educational level. Prior knowledge of the therapy was affected by the educational level (p=0.013 for the advantages and p=0.004 for the side effects) and the professional role (patients vs caregivers: p=0.009 for the advantages and p<0.001 for side affects); patient knowledge of the advantages (median 6) tended to increase as the disease progressed (p=0.015). The most common response by patients was that informed consent was necessary for all drugs (35.1%); 73.1% of the caregivers considered it necessary only for severe side effects. The preferred modality of consent was discussion with the caregiver during the clinical controls (42% of all cases)., Conclusions: Patient interest in and comprehension of an informed consent form with a detailed explanation of the therapy was high; the caregiver's opinion was still the most valued teaching tool.

Unlabelled: Living kidney donation is an important clinical option, encountering different fortunes in the world., Aim: To analyse the opinions of a large subset of older teenagers attending high school (7999 students, median age 18) on different aspects of living kidney transplantation., Methods: Analysis of semistructured questionnaires submitted within an educational campaign on dialysis and transplantation in the high schools of Torino and its county (about 2,000,000 inhabitants)., Results: Over 90% of the students had already heard of transplantation, mainly via television (88.4% county, 84.5% city). 80% would donate a kidney to a family member (3.5% wouldn't, 16.5% uncertain); answers were correlated with sex (females more than males p<0.0001), school type (istituti tecnici versus licei p=0.007), interest (yes versus other p<0.0001). A lower percent of individuals would receive a kidney (58.4% county, 59.4% city), only 10% would ask for donation. Over 40% of students consider legally buying a kidney a patient's right, only 26.6% would discourage this choice. The answers were correlated with the reverse pattern as for non-mercenary donation with type of school (licei more than istituti tecnici: p<0.0001), sex (males versus females p<0.0001), interest (not versus yes: p=0.002)., Conclusions: Teenagers are favourable towards all forms of living kidney donation. The lower prevalence of positive answers on acceptance versus donation suggests that fears of endangering the donor's health may be one of the causes for a low living donation rate in our setting. The mixed answers on mercenary donation suggest discussing this complex issue in future educational programs.

In the aging of Western populations, decreased mortality is counterbalanced by an increase in morbidity, particularly involving chronic diseases such as most renal diseases. The price of the successful care of chronic conditions, such as cardiovascular diseases or diabetes, is a continuous increase in new dialysis patients. However, the increased survival of patients on chronic renal replacement therapies poses new challenges to nephrologists and calls for new models of care. Since its split from internal medicine, nephrology has seen a progressive trend toward super specialization and the differentiation into at least 3 major branches (nephrology, dialysis, and transplantation), following a path common to several other fields of internal medicine. The success in the care of chronic patients is owed not only to a careful technical prescription, but also to the ability to teach self-care and attain compliance; this requires good medical practice and a sound patient-physician relationship. In this context, the usual models of care may fail to provide adequate coordination and, despite valuable single elements, could end up as an orchestra without a conductor. We propose an integrated model of care oriented to the type of patient (tested in our area especially for diabetic patients): the patient is followed-up by the same team from the first signs of renal disease to eventual dialysis or transplantation. This model offers an interesting alternative both for patients, who usually seek continuity of care, and for nephrologists who prefer a holistic and integrated patient-physician approach.

Background: Informed consent is crucial in therapeutic choices; however, the forms presented to patients are often locally developed and information may not be homogeneous., Objective: To prepare an evidence-based model for informed consent, applied in the case of erythropoietin therapy (EPO) as a teaching tool for medical students., Methods: Methodological tools of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) were developed within the EBM Course in the Medical School of Torino, Italy, as problem solving and patient information tools (5th year students work in small groups under the supervision of statisticians, epidemiologists and experts of internal medicine--nephrology in this case)., Results: Methodological and ethical problems were identified: in the pre-dialysis field, evidence from randomized clinical trials (RCT) is scant; how to use evidence gathered in dialysis? How to deal with implementation? How with the mass media? Do we need to discuss the drug choice with the patients? How to deal with rare and severe side effects?). The "evidence" was searched for on Medline/Embase, by using key-words and free terms. About 680 papers were retrieved and screened. Forms available on the Internet were retrieved and a general scheme was drawn: it included 5 areas: title, aim and targets (patients and family physicians); search strategies and updating; pros and cons of therapy; alternative options; open questions., Conclusions: EBM may offer valuable tools for systematically approaching patient information; the inclusion of this kind of exercise in the Medical School EBM courses may help enhance the awareness of future physicians of the correct communication with patients.

Background: Home hemodialysis is usually considered a superior therapy, whose decline is related to demographic, social, psychological and financial factors as well as to competition with renal transplantation and PD., Methods: A home hemodialysis program was started in November 1998 in the University of Torino, Italy (200-210 patients on dialysis). Its main features are the tailoring of dialysis schedules and the acceptance of patients with comorbidity. Nurses assist home sessions in case of short-term problems, while the training center ensures follow-up for long-term clinical and logistic problems., Results: The program started in November 1998 on a previous one (active from 1970 to 1998; 6 patients on treatment in November 1998). Since then, 25 more patients joined the program. Out of 31 patients followed since November 1998, 4 were grafted, 2 died, and 2 dropped out from training. In June 2001, 15 patients were on home hemodialysis, 8 on training. Dialysis schedules and controls are flexible and tailored; in June 2001, range of dialysis time was 1.20-5 h; sessions: 2-6; 8 patients were on thrice-weekly dialysis, 7 on daily dialysis; all patients reached target EKRc >10 ml/min (median 15, range 11-24 ml/min)., Conclusion: Tailored, flexible schedules allowed home hemodialysis in over 10% of our patients, confirming that there is still room for this treatment in our setting., (Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel)

Background: Urinalysis is a fundamental test in internal medicine and nephrology. Figures for costs are available in the general laboratory, where biochemical and microscopic urinalysis are commonly performed as semiautomated screening tests. Information on costs is lacking in the nephrology laboratory, where a time-consuming morphological analysis is usually preferred. This study analyses the costs of urinalysis in a nephrology laboratory., Methods: In the nephrology laboratory at the University of Turin - Italy, biochemical urinalysis consists of multi-property strip and proteinuria/creatininuria, done by laboratory technicians. Phase-contrast microscopy is done by a nephrologist or biologist. Time dedicated to the tests was recorded by the same operator over 20 working days, during which 350 urine samples were processed (median 19/day, range 842). The production costs were calculated with the logic bottom-up technique., Results: Overall time needed was 11.9 minutes/sample. Biochemical urinalysis required 6.6 minutes/sample; time required and samples processed were inversely related (< or =19 samples: 7.95 minutes/sample; >19 samples: 5.6 minutes/sample, p=0.01). Microscopic urinalysis took 5.3 minutes/slide; the best time-to-samples ratio was at 18-22 samples per day (with peak efficiency at 21 samples: 4.6 minutes). Cost of reagents and disposables was Euro1.06/sample. Time accounted for euro 5.32/sample (technicians, nephrologist-biologist), with total direct cost of euro 6.38/sample., Conclusion: In a nephrology laboratory, microscopic urinalysis is a time-consuming, expensive test. Analysis of cost and modalities may be useful, in a time of budget constrains, to maintain a role for this precious semeiotic art.

Background: Long-term survivors are living evidence of the goals and limits of renal replacement therapy (RRT)., Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed on all cases (188 patients) with RRT follow-up >/=20 years in Piemonte, northern Italy (4 350 000 inhabitants, 22 dialysis centres). Study included revision of clinical charts and assessment of functional (Karnofsky scale, Ks) and nutritional status (subjective global assessment, SGA). According to treatment history, patients were sorted into three groups: group 1, 56 patients always on dialysis; group 2, 40 patients on dialysis with previous graft; group 3, 92 grafted patients., Results: Age differed between group 1 and groups 2 and 3 (59.5+/-11.5 vs 51.5+/-7.9 and 51.0+/-9.0 years; P=0.001). Prevalence of comorbidity was higher in groups 1 and 2 (94.6% and 95%) compared with group 3 (81.5%), reflecting selection during follow-up. Twenty-two cases (11.7%) had no comorbidity; these patients were younger (44.3+/-8.5 years) and 17 out of 22 had a functioning graft. The most common comorbidities were vasculopathy (73.4%), bone disease (72.9%) and cardiopathy (33.5%). Severe visual impairment was a common problem (18%), with a higher prevalence in patients with cardiovascular comorbidity (32%). Severe depression was found in 13.3% of cases. Despite comorbidity, functional scores (Ks) were good (higher in group 3 (88.1+/-15) than in groups 1 and 2 (67.9+/-21.9 and 75.5+/-18, respectively); P=0.000) and 64% of patients were well nourished. The combination of cardiovascular comorbidity, bone disease and visual impairment may reflect the premature ageing of RRT patients., Conclusion: Despite the high prevalence of comorbidity, long-term follow-up may promote good clinical conditions at least in some patients, highlighting the therapeutic potentials of dialysis in an era of reconsideration of open acceptance of RRT.

Background: Elderly diabetics on dialysis are dramatically increasing in number. Their late referral reduces efficacy of therapeutic interventions; early referral is fundamental for their survival on dialysis. However, need for nephrological follow-up in case of early referral is not assessed. The objective was to define the need for follow-up in the nephrology setting of Type 2 diabetics, according to the early referral criteria of serum creatinine > or = 1.5 mg/dl or macroproteinuria., Methods: The setting of the study was an outpatient diabetic care unit (University of Torino), where approximately 25% of the Type 2 diabetics of a 900,000-inhabitant city (Torino, Northern Italy) were followed. At the time of the study (1998-1999) the unit followed 5182 Type 2 diabetics whose serum creatinine and proteinuria were tested at least yearly. A total of 3826 prevalent and 478 incident patients with one or more analyses in the same laboratory were included in the study. Demographic data were not statistically different between selected and excluded patients. We calculated the stepwise need for nephrological follow-ups calculated according to our usual policy (4-12 evaluations/ year, on serum creatinine and proteinuria, and 30 min/evaluation)., Results: The prevalence of increased serum creatinine and macroproteinuria was high (in the prevalent cohort: serum creatinine > or = 1.5 mg/dl, 8.1%; proteinuria 0.3 g/day, 25.2%; serum creatinine > or = 3 mg/dl, 1.2%; nephrotic proteinuria 3.4%). Projecting data to the entire unit, with adherence to our evaluation protocol, early nephrological follow-up of Type 2 diabetics requires approximately 1300 h/year (one full-time nephrologist); five nephrologists are needed for our city, and 24 for the region (4350 000 inhabitants)., Conclusions: Early nephrological referral and follow-up of Type 2 diabetics is time consuming and expensive. Meeting the outpatient care needs of this critical cohort requires considerable resources.

Background: The need for data bank gathering information in dialysis patients is as old as dialysis. Dialysis Registries presently active are characterized by different policies of data gathering (large vs small number of information) and of use (research vs economical or clinical purposes). Aim of the work was a discussion on the use of a Regional Registry (RPDT, Regional Registry of Dialysis and Transplantation of Piedmont, Italy), gathering since 1981 a wide set of information (about 80 items) on all patients treated in a relatively small area (about 4,300,000 inhabitants)., Methods: Two researches were selected: the first includes patients treated for > or = 20 years by RRT. Cases were identified on the basis of RPDT data and an inquiry regarding all patients was performed, with specific interest on comorbidity. The second includes diabetic patients on regular RRT, a sample of which was further analyzed in high detail., Results and Conclusions: While a Regional Registry, even gathering a wide set of data is unable to answer to the most qualitative questions, such as quality of life, its archives are a powerful tool to identify cases. Furthermore, ad hoc inquiries may represent a way to control quality of data or to test new fields to be studied. In the case of patients with long RRT follow-up, comorbidity questions were tested before being included on RPDT. In the case of a sample of diabetic patients, type of diabetes and cause of ESRD were controlled. This biunivocal relationship between clinical work-up and epidemiological archives may often interest future perspectives.

Therapeutic compliance and patient education are presently considered crucial parts of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) therapy. In the center where Italian home and self-care dialysis treatment started, an education program was designed as multi-step pathway--following patients from chronic renal failure to dialysis and eventual graft--employing lessons, booklets, and books. Each step was validated in various subsets of patients. Lessons involved two hours of informal discussion on the main aspects of ESRD and renal replacement therapy (RRT); booklets were created from tape recordings of the lessons. Patient participation was good, with 28 of 33 patients on charge in the center for 6 months or more taking part in more than one lesson in 1999. In 16 of 16 patients who answered a questionnaire after two lessons, expressed opinion was "good" to "fair." All asked for further material. With regard to books, 500 copies of the book What does dialysis mean? were given out in the region; this book was validated in 22 patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) and 18 on hemodialysis (HD). It helped patients to accept dialysis in 65% of cases and to comprehend it in 90%. Four thousand copies of the book Stories, containing 18 interviews on transplantation, were printed, and this book was validated in 21 patients on self-care and 35 on hospital dialysis (potential candidates for graft). Of 56 patients, 53 asked for further material; 19 changed their initial opinion (10 choose transplantation, despite initial skepticism; 9 put off transplantation, despite initial acceptance). On a local scale, the program led 12 of 18 new patients, who followed at least part of the program, to choose self-dialysis (PD, home, and self-care dialysis).