Search

In the last years, change in multiple sclerosis (MS) therapeutic scenario has highlighted the need for an improved doctor-patient communication in advance of treatment initiation in order to allow patient's empowerment in the decision-making process. Aims: The aims of our project were to review the strategies used by Italian MS specialists to inform patients about treatment options and to design a multicentre shared document that homogenizes the information about disease-modifying treatment (DMTs) and the procedure of taking informed consent in clinical practice. Results: The new resource, obtained by consensus among 31 neurologists from 27 MS Centres in Italy with the supervision of a medico-legal advisor, received the aegis of Italian Neurological Society (SIN) and constitutes a step toward a standardized decision process around DMTs in MS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Clinicians are increasingly recognizing the importance of shared decision-making in complex treatment choices, highlighting the importance of the patient's rationale and motivation for switching therapies. This study aimed to evaluate the association between different modalities of changing multiple sclerosis (MS) treatments, cognitive profile and attitude and preferences of patients concerning treatment choice., Methods: This multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted at 28 Italian MS centers in the period between June 2016 and June 2017. We screened all MS patients treated with any DMT, with a treatment compliance of at least 80% of therapy administered during the 3 last months who needed to modify MS therapy because of efficacy, safety or other reasons during a follow-up visit. At the time of switching the symbol digit modalities test (SDMT) and the Control Preference Scale (CPS) were evaluated. According to the CPS, patients were classified as "active" (i.e. who prefer making the medical decision themselves), "collaborative" (i.e. who prefer decisions be made jointly with the physician), or "passive" (i.e. who prefer the physician make the decision)., Results: Out of 13,657 patients recorded in the log, 409 (3%) changed therapy. Of these, 336 (2.5%) patients, 69.6% were female and with mean age 40.6 ± 10.5 years, were enrolled. According to the CPS score evaluation, a significant high percentage of patients (51.1%) were considered collaborative, 74 patients (22.5%) were passive, and 60 (18.2%) patients were active. Stratifying according to CPS results, we found a higher SDMT score among collaborative patients compared to active and passive ones (45.8 ± 12.3 versus 41.0 ± 13.2 versus 41.7 ± 12.8, p < 0.05)., Conclusion: In this study, the CPS evaluation showed that more than 50% of patients who needed to change therapy chose a "collaborative" role in making treatment decision. Cognitive profile with SDMT seems to correlate with patients' preference on treatment decision, showing better scores in collaborative patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Francesco Patti has received honoraria for speaking activities by Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA; he also served as advisory board member the following companies: Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA; he was also funded by Pfizer and FISM for epidemiological studies; he received grants for congress participation from Almirall, Bayer Shering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. Clara G. Chisari has received grants for congress participation from Almirall, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. Simona Toscano declares no conflict of interest. Pietro Annovazzi has received honoraria for lecturing and participation in advisory boards, and/or travel expenses for attending congresses and meetings from Almirall, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Mylan, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. Paola Banfi has received support for attendance to scientific meetings from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, and Sanofi Genzyme. Roberto Bergamaschi has received honoraria for lectures, travel and registration coverage for attending several national or international congresses or symposia from Almirall, Bayer Shering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. Raffaella Clerici has received speaker's honoraria, consulting fees, honoraria in advisory boards, support for attendance of scientific meetings from Meck Serono, Novartis, and Sanofi Genzyme. Marta Zaffira Conti declares there is no conflict of interest. Antonio Cortese has received speaker honoraria, travel grants, advisory boards member honoraria from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. Roberta Fantozzi has received consulting fees and honoraria for advisory boards from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, and TEVA Diana Ferraro declares there is no conflict of interest. Mariano Fischetti declares there is no conflict of interest. Maura Frigo declares there is no conflict of interest. Maurizia Gatto declares there is no conflict of interest. Paolo Immovilli has received speaking honoraria, consulting fees, advisory board honoraria from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. Stefania Leoni declares there is no conflict of interest. Simona Malucchi has received speaker's honoraria and consulting fees, honoraria in advisory boards from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA Giorgia Maniscalco has received honoraria for public speaking and advisory boards from Biogen, Novartis, and Merck Serono. Girolama Alessandra Marfia is an Advisory Board member of Biogen Idec, Sanofi Genzyme, Merck-Serono, Novartis, and TEVA, and received honoraria for speaking or consultation fees from Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, and TEVA. She is the principal investigator in clinical trials for Actelion, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Mitsubishi, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and TEVA Damiano Paolicelli has received honoraria for consultancy and/or speaking from Almirall, Bayer Shering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. Paola Perini has received speaker honoraria and consulting fees from Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. Carlo Serrati declares no conflict of interest. Rocco Totaro has received speaker's honoraria, consulting fee, honoraria for advisory boards, support for attendance of scientific meetings from Alfa Wasserman, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi genzyme, and TEVA. Gabriella Turano has received support for attendance to scientific meetings from Almirall, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, and Sanofi Genzyme. Paola Valentino has received speaker's honoraria and consulting fee, honoraria for advisory boards from Biogen Idec, Novartis, Merck Serono, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. Mauro Zaffaroni has received honoraria for lecturing or participating for advisory boards or travel funding from Almirall, Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. Cristina Zuliani has received speaker's honoraria and consulting fees, honoraria for advisory boards, support for attendance of scientific meetings from Almirall, Bayer Shering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. Diego Centonze is an Advisory Board member of Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, GW Pharmaceuticals, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA, and received honoraria for speaking or consultation fees from Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen, GW Pharmaceuticals, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and TEVA. He is also the principal investigator in clinical trials for Bayer Schering, Biogen, Merck Serono, Mitsubishi, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. His preclinical and clinical research was supported by grants from Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Celgene, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme and TEVA., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background and Objectives: Several studies have assessed risk factors associated with the severity of COVID-19 outcomes in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). The potential role of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) and demographic and clinical factors on the risk of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 infection has not been evaluated so far. The objective of this study was to assess risk factors of contracting SARS-CoV-2 infection in PwMS by using data collected in the Italian MS Register (IMSR)., Methods: A case-control (1:2) study was set up. Cases included PwMS with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19, and controls included PwMS without a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19. Both groups were propensity score-matched by the date of COVID-19 diagnosis, the date of last visit, and the region of residence. No healthy controls were included in this study. COVID-19 risk was estimated by multivariable logistic regression models including demographic and clinical covariates. The impact of DMTs was assessed in 3 independent logistic regression models including one of the following covariates: last administered DMT, previous DMT sequences, or the place where the last treatment was administered., Results: A total of 779 PwMS with confirmed COVID-19 (cases) were matched to 1,558 PwMS without COVID-19 (controls). In all 3 models, comorbidities, female sex, and a younger age were significantly associated ( p < 0.02) with a higher risk of contracting COVID-19. Patients receiving natalizumab as last DMT (OR [95% CI]: 2.38 [1.66-3.42], p < 0.0001) and those who underwent an escalation treatment strategy (1.57 [1.16-2.13], p = 0.003) were at significantly higher COVID-19 risk. Moreover, PwMS receiving their last DMT requiring hospital access (1.65 [1.34-2.04], p < 0.0001) showed a significant higher risk than those taking self-administered DMTs at home., Discussion: This case-control study embedded in the IMSR showed that PwMS at higher COVID-19 risk are younger, more frequently female individuals, and with comorbidities. Long-lasting escalation approach and last therapies that expose patients to the hospital environment seem to significantly increase the risk of SARS-CoV2 infection in PwMS., Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class III evidence that among patients with MS, younger age, being female individuals, having more comorbidities, receiving natalizumab, undergoing an escalating treatment strategy, or receiving treatment at a hospital were associated with being infected with COVID-19. Among patients with MS who were infected with COVID-19, a severe course was associated with increasing age and having a progressive form of MS, whereas not being on treatment or receiving an interferon beta agent was protective., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.)

Background: Rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody leading to B lymphocyte depletion, is increasingly used as an off-label treatment option for multiple sclerosis (MS)., Objective: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of rituximab in relapsing-remitting (RR) and progressive MS., Methods: This is a multicenter, retrospective study on consecutive MS patients treated off-label with rituximab in 22 Italian and 1 Swiss MS centers. Relapse rate, time to first relapse, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) progression, incidence of adverse events, and radiological outcomes from 2009 to 2019 were analyzed., Results: A total of 355/451 enrolled subjects had at least one follow-up visit and were included in the outcome analysis. Annualized relapse rate significantly decreases after rituximab initiation versus the pre-rituximab start year in RRMS (from 0.86 to 0.09, p  < .0001) and in secondary-progressive (SP) MS (from 0.34 to 0.06, p  < .0001) and had a slight decrease in primary-progressive (PP) MS patients (from 0.12 to 0.07, p  = 0.45). After 3 years from rituximab start, the proportion of patients with a confirmed EDSS progression was 14.6% in the RRMS group, 24.7% in the SPMS group, and 41.5% in the PPMS group. No major safety concerns arose., Conclusion: Consistently with other observational studies, our data show effectiveness of rituximab in reducing disease activity in patients with MS.

Background: clinical factors and frequency of disease-modifying therapy (DMT) changes/interruptions in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients have not been well defined. The aim of this study was to describe reasons of MS treatment modifications in a large cohort of Italian MS patients., Methods: this multicenter, cross-sectional non interventional study (SWITCH) conducted at 28 Italian MS centers, screened, by visit/telephone contact between June 2016 and June 2017, all RRMS patients receiving stable DMT treatment and enrolled patients with change in DMT treatment., Results: out of 13,657 recorded in the log, 409 (3%) changed therapy. Of these, 336 (2.5%), met the study criteria and were considered eligible. Among 303 (90.2% of 336) patients switching, the most common reason was "lack of efficacy" (58.4% of 303). Among 30 (8.9%) patients who interrupted treatment temporarily, the most common reason was pregnancy (40.0% of 30). Out of 3 (0.9%) patients who discontinued treatment permanently, 2 (66.7%) had as first reason as "patient decision". Multivariate analysis showed that EDSS was the only variable with statistically significant effect on changing treatments (r = 8.33; p-value of Type III Sum of Squares = 0.016)., Conclusion: in our study, 303 (90.2% of eligible patients) switched treatment, 30 (8.9%) interrupted treatment temporarily, and 3 (0.9%) discontinued treatment permanently. Efficacy remains the main driving force behind switching behavior, as the primary aim of treatment is to be disease free or reduce disease activity., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: F.P. has received honoraria for speaking activities by Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA; he also served as advisory board member the following companies: Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA; he was also funded by Pfizer and FISM for epidemiological studies; he received grants for congress participation from Almirall, Bayer Shering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. C.G.C. has received grants for congress participation from Almirall, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. E.D'A. has received grants for speaking activities from Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, TEVA and grants for congress participation from Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. P.A. has received honoraria for lecturing and participation in advisory boards, and/or travel expenses for attending congresses and meetings from Almirall, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Mylan, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. P.B. has received support for attendance to scientific meetings from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, and Sanofi Genzyme. R.B: has received honoraria for lectures, travel and registration coverage for attending several national or international congresses or symposia from Almirall, Bayer Shering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. R.C. has received speaker's honoraria, consulting fees, honoraria in advisory boards, support for attendance of scientific meetings from Meck Serono, Novartis, and Sanofi Genzyme. M.C. Author declares there is no conflict of interest. A.C. has received speaker honoraria, travel grants, advisory boards member honoraria from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. R.F. has received consulting fees and honoraria for advisory boards from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, and TEVA. M.Fi. Author declares there is no conflict of interest. M.Fr. has received speaker's honoraria and consulting fees, honoraria for advisory boards, support for attendance of scientific meetings from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, TEVA, and Sanofi Genzyme. M.G. Author declares there is no conflict of interest. P.I. has received speaking honoraria, consulting fees, advisory board honoraria from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA S.L. Author declares there is no conflict of interest. S.M. has received speaker's honoraria and consulting fees, honoraria in advisory boards from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. G.M. has received honoraria for public speaking and advisory boards from Biogen, Novartis, and Merck Serono. G.A.M. is an Advisory Board member of Biogen Idec, Sanofi Genzyme, Merck-Serono, Novartis, and TEVA, and received honoraria for speaking or consultation fees from Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, and TEVA. She is the principal investigator in clinical trials for Actelion, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Mitsubishi, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and TEVA. D.P. has received honoraria for consultancy and/or speaking from Almirall, Bayer Shering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. C.S. Author declares there is no conflict of interest. P.P. has received speaker honoraria and consulting fees from Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. P.S. has received speaker's honoraria and consulting fees, honoraria for advisory boards, and travel grants from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi genzyme, and TEVA. R.T. has received speaker's honoraria, consulting fee, honoraria for advisory boards, support for attendance of scientific meetings from Alfa Wasserman, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi genzyme, and TEVA. G.T. has received support for attendance to scientific meetings from Almirall, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, and Sanofi Genzyme. P.V. has received speaker's honoraria and consulting fee, honoraria for advisory boards from Biogen Idec, Novartis, Merck Serono, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. M.Z. has received honoraria for lecturing or participating for advisory boards or travel funding from Almirall, Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. C.Z. has received speaker's honoraria and consulting fees, honoraria for advisory boards, support for attendance of scientific meetings from Almirall, Bayer Shering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. D.C. is an Advisory Board member of Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, GW Pharmaceuticals, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA, and received honoraria for speaking or consultation fees from Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen, GW Pharmaceuticals, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and TEVA. He is also the principal investigator in clinical trials for Bayer Schering, Biogen, Merck Serono, Mitsubishi, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. His preclinical and clinical research was supported by grants from Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Celgene, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme and TEVA., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Interferon beta (IFNβ) was the first specific disease-modifying treatment licensed for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, and is still one of the most commonly prescribed treatments. A strong body of evidence supports the effectiveness of IFNβ preparations in reducing the annual relapse rate, magnetic resonance (MRI) disease activity and disease progression. However, the development of binding/neutralizing antibodies (BAbs/NAbs) during treatment negatively affects clinical and MRI outcomes. Therefore, guidelines for the clinical use for the detection of NAbs in MS may result in better treatment of these patients. In October 2012, a panel of Italian neurologists from 17 MS clinics convened in Milan to review and discuss data on NAbs and their clinical relevance in the treatment of MS. In this paper, we report the panel's recommendations for the use of IFNβ Nabs detection in the early identification of IFNβ non-responsiveness and the management of patients on IFNβ treatment in Italy, according to a model of therapeutically appropriate care.

Chronic and life-threatening neurodegenerative diseases may be associated with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Therefore, the current study was an investigation of the prevalence of PTSD in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, and identification of significant determinants of PTSD. Two hundred thirty-two MS patients were consecutively recruited and screened for the presence of PTSD with the Impact of Event Scale-Revised, corroborated by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. Furthermore, participants were administered the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Fatigue Severity Scale. Twelve patients (12/232, i.e. 5.17 %) were diagnosed as suffering from PTSD. Levels of education, anxiety and depression were significant determinants of the presence of PTSD. The role played by the levels of education, anxiety and depression in determining the presence of PTSD has been discussed. Further research on the psychological features of neurodegenerative diseases is urgently needed in order to plan appropriate treatments and improve patients' quality of life.

Despite the existence of therapeutic guidelines, management of multiple sclerosis relapse remains heterogeneous. Optimisation of relapse outcome demands an improved understanding of the neurologist's therapeutic attitude towards relapse management, which is the aim of this study. Neurologists from 13 multiple sclerosis centres completed a questionnaire every time they assessed multiple sclerosis relapses. The questionnaire requested a guided description of the relapse's clinical characteristics and an indication of the prescribed therapy, supported with up to 3 out of 20 suggested reasons. Over 3 months, 368 questionnaires were collected. Median percentage (%) of 21 relapses resulting in a prescription was 88.9%. Corticosteroids represented the most frequent prescription. A short-course of high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone was the most used corticosteroid (73.7%). Treatment was administrated mainly in day case unit (80.0%) and at home (13.6%). A tapered therapy was prescribed to 28.8% of patients. Neurologists' therapeutic decisions were driven mainly by relapse severity (45.3%) and symptom evolution (24.2%). Our study confirms the therapeutic attitude of multiple sclerosis specialists in treating relapses with high-dose intravenous corticosteroids in a day hospital setting, with a tapering in a proportion of cases. The main reasons for prescription are relapse severity and symptom evolution.