Search

Background: In Awake Craniotomy (AC), α2-agonists and remifentanil (clonidine and dexmedetomidine) are used in the preoperative phase and throughout the procedure to combine monitored anesthesia care and local anesthesia. The study aims were to specify the key role of α2-agonists administered and to evaluate complication presence/absence in anesthesiologic management. Methods: 42 patients undergoing AC in 3 different centers in the south of Italy (Foggia, San Giovanni Rotondo, and Bari) were recruited. Our protocol involves analgo-sedation by administering Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil in continuous intravenous infusion, allowing the patient to be sedated and in comfort but contactable and spontaneously breathing. During pre-surgery, the patient is premedicated with intramuscular clonidine (2 µg/kg). In the operating setting, Dexmedetomidine in infusion and Remifentanil in Target Controlled Infusion for effect are started. At the end of the surgical procedure, the infusion of drugs was suspended. Results: There were no intraoperative side effects. The mean duration of interventions was 240 ± 62 min. The average quantity of Remifentanil and Dexmedetomidine infused during interventions were 4.2 ± 1.3 mg and 1.0 ± 0.3 mg, respectively. No significant side effects were described in the post-operative phase. A total of 86% of patients and 93% of surgeons were totally satisfied. Conclusions: Synergy between opioid drugs and α2 agonists plays a fundamental role in ensuring procedure success. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Local anesthesia for single incision slings has shown a good objective and subjective cure rate in women with stress urinary incontinence. The aim of the present study was to verify the efficacy and safety of local anesthesia during Altis® single incision placement. One hundred sixty-six consecutive patients (83 patients for each group: local resp. spinal anesthesia) were selected from our database for this retrospective study among women who underwent an Altis® implantation for SUI from September 2016 to June 2021, after unsuccessful previous conservative treatment. Primary endpoints were objective and subjective cure rates; secondary endpoint was the evaluation of complications linked to this procedure. A total of 155 included patients completed our 12 months follow-up. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. Operative time (percentage difference of 50%; p < 0.05) and the Intraoperative Difficulty Scale resulted lower in spinal patients. No differences were found between populations in terms of objective (cough stress test and urodynamics) and subjective (PGI-I and FSDS questionnaires) cure rate and postoperative complications. Local anesthesia for Altis® implantation could be considered a safe alternative to spinal anesthesia and an effective opportunity to avoid general anesthesia, increasing the possibility of outpatient implantation of this sling system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Prostatic urethral lift (PUL) is a minimally invasive surgical treatment for obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms. We report the experience of two centres in Italy where PUL was performed under pure local anaesthetic. The procedure was well tolerated with no serious adverse events. Clinical outcomes at 1, 6 and 12 months were comparable with those reported in the literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study aimed to compare the analgesic effect of ibuprofen 400 mg given 30 min before or immediately after third molars surgery under local anaesthesia. Materials and Methods: The single‐centre, randomized, split‐mouth, triple‐blind, clinical trial involved 38 outpatients, for a total of 76 bilateral symmetrical fully bone impacted mandibular third molars. Each patient was undergone to separate surgical sessions for the right and left side, and ibuprofen was randomly administered 30 min before or immediately after the intervention. Study participants recorded pain intensity using Numerical Rating Scale‐11, the timing of rescue therapy intake and overall tablets consumption over 3 days. Results: The overall pain intensity score was lower in the group receiving ibuprofen immediately after (3.13 ± 2.46) than before (3.58 ± 2.40) surgery, with statistically significant differences only on the second and third days. The mean time to the first using rescue therapy was longer in the postoperative (598.33 ± 422.62 min) than in the preoperative (406.25 ± 149.79 min) analgesic treatment group (p =.123). The number of supplemented ibuprofen tablets did not differ (p =.530) between both groups. Conclusions: Within the limits of the present study, ibuprofen administration immediately after surgery seemed to be more effective than preoperative administration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The present study was carried out to examine the removal of melanin pigmentation from human gingival surfaces using the Er:YAG laser. The results were compared to those obtained using the Nd:YAG laser. Two laser devices, an Er:YAG laser (SMART2940D) and an Nd:YAG laser (A10) (developed by DEKA, Florence, Italy) were used for laser treatment. The parameters of the Er:YAG laser were 5 Hz and 100 mJ, applied for 230 μs using a contact tip under water mist and a noncontact tip without water mist. The Nd:YAG laser was applied at 10 Hz and 100 mJ for 300 μs with Chinese black ink. In all cases, melanin pigmentation could be removed without local anesthesia. Melanin pigmentation removed by Er:YAG laser with or without water mist induced slight bleeding. Neither postoperative pain nor swelling were observed. Compared with the Nd:YAG laser, the Er:YAG laser showed no tendency for melanin pigmentation recurrence after 36 months. In addition, the color of the gingival surface lased by the Er:YAG laser was changed to pink. Comparison with the Nd:YAG laser revealed that the Er:YAG laser is useful in the removal of human gingival melanin pigmentation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare 22 Fr unipolar resectoscope with the traditional 26 Fr unipolar resectoscope in endometrial polypectomy performed under paracervical block anesthesia. Methods: The trial took place in Gynecologic Unit, Department of Surgery, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome. Inclusion criteria were: diagnosis of endometrial polyps <3cm at office hysteroscopy; agreement of patients to perform surgery under paracervical block anesthesia but not in office setting. Patients with ASA physical status classes III or more and with contraindication to operative hysteroscopy were excluded. Before the procedure, the recruited patients were randomly assigned to two groups, 35 to the 22 Fr unipolar resectoscope group (group A) and 35 to the 26 Fr unipolar resectoscope group (group B). Primary endpoint was the time spent for cervical dilatation and resection. Secondary endpoints were pain during and after surgery, efficacy of paracervical block, use of analgesic drugs during and after the procedure, patients' satisfaction, correlation between pain and menopause or parity. Statistical analysis was performed by the SPSS software, and the tests used were Pearson Chi-Square, One-way ANOVA and Mann-Whitney test. A p value <.05 was considered significant. Results: The mean time for cervical dilatation was two minutes in group A (26 Fr) and five minutes in group B (22 Fr, p=.001). Operative mean time was four minutes in group A and seven minutes in group B (p=.001). Pain during dilatation was analogous (VAS=6, p=.054), while during the procedure it was higher in group B (VAS=1 vs VAS=2, p=.003). Sufentanil was administered during resection in 19 patients of group A and in 22 patients of group B (p=.754). General anesthesia was never necessary. Postoperative pain was higher in group B (p=.01). Nine patients of group B needed analgesics, as opposed to no patient of group A (p=.002). Conclusions: The 22 Fr unipolar resectoscope appears advantageous compared to the 26 Fr resectoscope in the resection of endometrial polyps <3 cm, in terms of cervical dilatation and operative time, pain and need of postoperative analgesics. Paracervical block is useful and safe in compliant patients at high risk for general anesthesia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the last 15 years, a rapid evolution occurred from the traditional hernioplasties toward prosthetic techniques, in Italy. Outpatient procedures under local anaesthesia are now most commonly performed. We report our experience with a personal modification of the sutureless mesh repair, called "held in mesh repair". From 1990 to 2003 we treated 3,520 cases of primary hernia with the "held in mesh repair". 2,370 patients were affected by a unilateral hernia and 575 by a bilateral one. Local anaesthesia was used in 92% of the cases, loco-regional in 6% and general in 2%. Sixteen (0.4%) hernias recurred after 2 years, while two further recurrences (total 0.5%) were observed after 3 years; three femoral pseudo-relapses (0.08%) occurred before the first postoperative year. An overall incidence of 1.3% of major complications were observed. One mortality case (0.02%) occurred 3 days after the operation for cardiovascular complications. The favourable results of the "held in mesh repair" and the simplicity of the procedure suggest that it can be considered a safe and reliable technique for most primary inguinal hernias. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To report our experience in performing cochlear implantation under local anesthesia in a group of patients who were deemed unfit for general anesthesia., Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed to analyze undesirable events and any other discomfort complained by patients during cochlear implantation. Analysis of patient's satisfaction was performed by means of a survey instrument. We have also compared the duration of surgery and hospitalization time with a control group that was implanted under general anesthesia., Result: Twenty-one cochlear implantation in 20 patients were performed under local anesthesia. Age of patients ranged from 38 to 85 years. All interventions were successfully completed without any conversions to general anesthesia. Discomfort during surgery was reported in five cases: vertigo triggered by electrode insertion in two patients, pain during the round window approach in two patients and distress during the use of drill in one case; no patient experienced agitation. During the postoperative period, no complications or unpleasant experiences were reported. Only two patients stated that they would not perform cochlear implantation again under local anesthesia. Lower duration surgery and hospitalization time were found in the local anesthesia group., Conclusion: Local anesthesia with conscious sedation is a safe and effective alternative for cochlear implant candidates considered unfit for general anesthesia. Fundamental for a successful procedure are preoperative counselling, accurate selection of the patients and constant intraoperative assistance. Unfeasibility of facial nerve monitoring and minor detrimental effect on training are the principal disadvantages in performing cochlear implantation under local anesthesia., (© 2020. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)