Search

An increased need of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support is going to become evident as treatment of SARS-CoV-2 respiratory distress syndrome. This is the first report of the Italian Society for Cardiac Surgery (SICCH) on preliminary experience with COVID-19 patients receiving ECMO support. Data from 12 Italian hospitals participating in SICCH were retrospectively analyzed. Between March 1 and September 15, 2020, a veno-venous (VV) ECMO system was installed in 67 patients (94%) and a veno-arterio-venous ECMO in four (6%). Five patients required VA ECMO after initial weaning from VV ECMO. Thirty (42.2%) patients were weaned from ECMO, while 39 (54.9%) died on ECMO, and six (8.5%) died after ECMO removal. Overall hospital survival was 36.6% (n = 26). Main causes of death were multiple organ failure (n = 14, 31.1%) and sepsis (n = 11, 24.4%). On multivariable analysis, predictors of death while on ECMO support were older age (p = 0.048), elevated pre-ECMO C-reactive protein level (p = 0.048), higher positive end-expiratory pressure on ventilator (p = 0.036) and lower lung compliance (p = 0.032). If the conservative treatment is not effective, ECMO support might be considered as life-saving rescue therapy for COVID-19 refractory respiratory failure. However warm caution and thoughtful approaches for timely detection and treatment should be taken for such a delicate patients population., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © ASAIO 2021.)

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has profoundly affected all health care professionals. The outbreak required a thorough reorganization of the Italian regional local health care system to preserve resources such as ventilators, beds in intensive care units and surgical and anaesthesiological staff. Levels of priority were created, together with a rigorous triage procedure for patients with COVID-19, which led to postponement of all elective procedures. Urgent cases were discussed with the local heart team and percutaneous approaches were selected as the first treatment option to reduce hospital stay. COVID-19 and COVID-19-free pathways were created, including adequate preparation of the operating room, management of anaesthesiological procedures, transportation of patients and disinfection. It was determined that patients with chronic diseases were at increased risk of adverse outcomes. Systemic inflammation, cytokine storm and hypercoagulability associated with COVID-19 increased the risk of heart failure and cardiac death. In this regard, the early use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation could be life-saving in patients with severe forms of acute respiratory distress syndrome or refractory heart failure. The goal of this paper was to report the Italian experience during the COVID-19 pandemic in the setting of cardiovascular surgery., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Background: Recent observational studies show an increase of more complex and critically ill patients referred to Italian cardiac rehabilitation (CR) departments; the exact mechanisms underlying this phenomenon, however, have not been clearly identified. The aim of our study was to evaluate the epidemiological and clinical changes that occurred over the last decade in patients hospitalized in CR departments with high admittance rates., Methods: We have retrospectively evaluated all patients admitted between 2002 and 2009 to our division of CR (n = 3340, 1155 female, mean age 66.4 ± 11 years) after recent cardiac surgery. The study population was divided into two homogeneous groups: the four-year period 2002-2005, group A (n = 1614, 540 female, mean age 66.1 ± 10 years) and the four-year period 2006-2009, group B (n = 1726, 615 female, mean age 67.4 ± 11 years). Data were compared using specific indicators of clinical complexity., Results: Patients aged >75 years were more in group B compared to A (26.3 vs 19.8%, p<0.0001), as well as patients with recent complex surgical interventions, such as combined coronary artery bypass grafting and heart valve surgery (16.4 vs 10.2%, p<0.0001). An increased incidence of cardiovascular death (1.4 vs 0.6%, p=0.02), acute coronary syndrome (1.5 vs 0.7%, p=0.02) and persistent atrial fibrillation/flutter (13.5 vs 7.1%, p<0.0001) was observed in group B, as well as an increased prevalence of systolic heart failure (18.3 vs 9.0%, p<0.0001). Similarly, the incidence of acute respiratory failure episodes (1.0 vs 0.4%, p=0.05), the prevalence of patients admitted with a tracheostomy tube (2.6 vs 0.2%, p<0.0001) and the incidence of acute renal failure (1.1 vs 0.5%, p=0.05) were significantly increased in group B. Postoperative infections and surgical wound complications were 4-fold higher in group B (13.9 vs 3.1%, p<0.0001, and 12.8 vs 2.3%, p<0.0001, respectively). Compared to group A, patients of group B showed a significantly lower physical performance, as expressed by the Rivermead motility index (3.8 ± 1.1 vs 5.2 ± 0.8, p<0.001); moreover, the number of subjects able to perform an incremental training program was significantly lower in group B than group A (14.8 vs 60.6%, p<0.0001). Mean hospital stay was longer in group B than group A (25.4 ± 13 vs 22.1 ± 9 days, p<0.001)., Conclusions: Our study, by collecting data from a CR division in northern Italy with high admittance rates, demonstrates a dramatic increase in clinical complexity over the last few years. This points to the need for new expertise and major resources to be allocated to CR departments.

Surgical revascularization for postinfarction cardiogenic shock carries 20-50% mortality. Beating-heart techniques have been favoured, but their impact on the avoidance of additional myocardial injury is unknown. Ten consecutive patients with postinfarction cardiogenic shock, unsuitable anatomy for percutaneous coronary intervention (Syntax score 34.0±7.5; triple-vessel disease, 10/10; left main stenosis, 5/10), and no associated cardiac procedure, were selected for salvage/emergent on-pump beating-heart coronary bypass surgery. Remote muscle was sequentially substrate-enhanced reperfused through the grafts after construction of distal anastomoses. Early/late mortality, preoperative/peak postoperative enzyme release, and baseline/pre-discharge ventricular function were analysed. One early death occurred. Patients received 2.9±0.6 grafts, always employing the left internal mammary artery. Cardiopulmonary bypass duration was 140±62 min. Left ventricular ejection fraction (29.4±5.8 vs. 37.5±8.3%), wall motion score index (2.10±0.29 vs. 1.86±0.28), and end-systolic volume index (42.1±11.5 vs. 33.1±14.0 ml/m(2)) acutely improved (P≤0.001), whereas functional mitral regurgitation decreased from 1.4±0.8 to 0.8±0.4 (P=0.051). Total creatine kinase levels significantly increased (P=0.017), but myocardial band isoenzyme did not (P=0.18). After 3.1±1.4 years, eight patients are alive and seven are free of recurrent heart failure. Satisfactory functional outcome can be achieved with beating-heart on-pump revascularization for postinfarction cardiogenic shock. Perioperative enzyme releases and ventricular functional variables may suggest reduced perioperative myocardial injury.

To determine the potential role of emergency surgical revascularization as treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), results in 79 patients undergoing operation for myocardial revascularization during AMI from January 1986 to January 1991 were reviewed. Clinical characteristics for inclusion in the study were: 1) emergency operation; 2) persistent angina not controlled by medical therapy; 3) fixed ST segment elevation until surgical procedure, independently from magnitude of enzymatic levels. The 79 patients were divided in 2 groups: 27 with AMI or evolving AMI (Group 1); 52 with AMI due to complications during PTCA (Group 2). Twenty-eight patients had extremely severe clinical conditions. Mean interval between the beginning of AMI and operation was 4.2 +/- 6.7 hours, with a statistically significant difference between Group 1 (8.7 +/- 10.0) and Group 2 (1.9 +/- 1.0). One hundred ninety-two grafts were performed (2.4 +/- 1.1 grafts/patient). Overall hospital mortality was 10.1% (CL 6.7-13.3) (8 deaths) with a difference between Group 1 [18.5% (CL 10.7-25.3)] and Group 2 [5.8% (CL 4.7-6.6)] (p = 0.074). The incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction was 30.4% (CL 24.9-35.1) for that one in the area of ischemic muscle and 2.6% (CL 0.8-4.1) for infarction in remote muscle. Multivariate analysis for the entire series (79 patients) identified as independent predictors of increased in-hospital mortality: preoperative cardiogenic shock (p = 1.000E-4) and hyperlipidemia (p = 0.008). In Group 1 multivariate analysis identified as independent predictors of increased in-hospital mortality: the attempt of revascularization by PTCA and hyperlipidemia; in Group 2: preoperative need of mechanical ventilatory support.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)