Search

Background: Epinephrine is the treatment of choice for acute food-allergic reactions but existing guidelines state that it should be prescribed uniquely to patients who already experienced at least one food-induced anaphylactic episode., Objective: We investigated whether in Italy epinephrine auto-injector is prescribed uniquely following the existing guidelines only, or is allergen-informed as well (i.e., based on the potential risk associated with sensitization to certain food allergens), and hence preventive., Methods: 1110 adult patients (mean age 31 years; M/F 391/719) with food allergy seen at 19 allergy outpatient clinics were studied. Patients with a history of probable anaphylaxis were identified. Subjects were classified as having primary (type 1) and/or secondary (type 2) food allergy and were divided into several subgroups based on the offending allergen/food. Epinephrine prescriptions were recorded and analyzed both as a whole and by sensitizing allergen., Results: Epinephrine was prescribed to 138/1100 (13%) patients with a significant difference between subjects with type-1 and type-2 food allergy (132/522 [25%] vs. 6/629 [1%]; p < 0.001). The epinephrine group included most patients with a history of anaphylaxis (55/62 [89%]) or emergency department visits 106/138 (77%). In some specific subsets, namely fish-, tree nuts-, and lipid trasfer protein (LTP)-allergic patients, epinephrine was prescribed to patients without a history of systemic allergic reactions., Conclusions: Italian allergy specialists prescribe epinephrine auto-injectors both on the basis of clinical history of severe reactions and on a critical analysis of the hazard associated with the relevant protein allergens, which suggests a good knowledge of allergens as well as acquaintance with the guidelines for prescription of emergency medication.

Objective of the Study: The aim of our work is to ascertain the frequency and the impact of acute allergic reactions on the routine of a highly-specialized Emergency Department collecting information on the admission, the typology of symptoms and the degree of severity calculating the incidence and the outcomes of the events., Materials and Methods: The study started the 1 July 2006 and the records of the Emergency Department of the Maggiore della Carità Hospital in Novara were consulted retrospectively in the period between the 1 January 2003 and the 31 December 2006, and prospectively up to the 31 December 2007, using keywords that could identify admission for suspected allergic reactions. Information relating to internal medicine and/or pediatric cases were examined, excluding all surgical and/or trauma cases. The number ofadmissions per year was considered broken down by clinical signs, triage assessment upon admission and discharge outcome., Results: Admissions to the Emergency Department during the period under consideration were 165,120 with 6107 suspected cases of allergic reactions. The symptoms most frequently reported both in adults (A) and children (C < or =18 years old), were: hives 37%, asthma 20.65 (A)% and 27.4% (C); drug allergy 7.5% (A) and 6.1% (C). Reactions to Hymenoptera venom were less frequent, 4.7% (A) and 1.27% (C); the frequency of angioedema, conjunctivitis and rhinitis was between 1 and 4%. The incidence of food allergies (1.4%) and anaphylaxis (0.8%) was comparable for all ages. The triage assessment showed a significant percentage of "yellow" and "red" codes, with 362 cases (5.9%) and 71 cases (1.16%) respectively. A total of 151 patients was hospitalized, no one classified as "white" code. Death occurred in 7 cases: 4 "yellow" codes and 3 "red" codes, respectively. A more detailed specialistic evaluation was recommended in only 10% of the patients., Conclusions: Admissions to the Emergency Department for suspected allergic reaction are proportional to the number of overall admissions for internal medicine cases and do not appear to be related to the general increase of allergies in the population. This led us to focus our attention on how allergic diseases impact the work of an Emergency Department and how to describe the discharge diagnosis better. A significant number of descriptive diagnoses also turned out to be inaccurate and did not allow the syndrome to be identified properly. The analysis of this information aims to be a stimulus to improve the emergency clinical approach used for allergic diseases and to plan the adequate management ofallergic patients after they have been treated in hospital.