Search

Italy has been hard hit by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection with more than 240,000 cases and 35,000 deaths. During the acute phase of the pandemic, the Italian government decided on the lockdown which lasted about 2 months. During this period, all surgical activities were limited to nondeferable procedures only. The sudden closure posed problems with the management of the heart surgery waiting which at that time included 135 patients. Among these were selected cases with the worst clinical characteristics that were progressively operated on. Compared with a similar period in 2019, the cardiac surgery activity of the "Lancisi Cardiovascular Center" in Ancona has been reduced by 65%. With pandemic mitigation, heart surgery activity has gradually resumed but many open questions remain. Above all, there is the problem of living with a low but persistent level of presence of the virus with the need to organize the activity to ensure patients and staff safety and an optimal level of performance., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Neurological events after cardiac surgery or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have a dramatic effect on patients' prognosis. Recent development of transcatheter cerebral protection systems aims to reduce their incidence, even if their use is currently limited to TAVI. Here we report our initial experience with transcatheter cerebral protection devices used in patients at high brain embolic risk undergoing cardiac surgery., Methods: Between December 2018 and March 2020, at the Cardiac Surgery Unit of Lancisi Cardiovascular Center in Ancona, Italy, 9 patients (mean age 77 years; median EuroSCORE II: 2.2%) underwent cardiac surgery using a transcatheter cerebral protection system (Sentinel, Claret Medical, Santa Rosa, CA, USA). In all cases, a preoperative computed tomography scan highlighted the presence of severely calcified ascending aorta., Results: The brain protection system was successfully implanted in all patients. Total time for device implantation and removal was less than 10 min in all cases. Four patients underwent aortic valve replacement, 2 mitral surgery, whereas 3 received combined valve surgery. Calcified debris were found within filters in 100% of patients. Postoperatively, there were neither neurological events nor major complications., Conclusions: In our experience, transferring transcatheter brain protection techniques and technologies to cardiac surgery allowed us (with excellent results) to avoid palliative percutaneous or medical management in patients with severe aortic calcifications. Waiting for more solid evidence, we believe that our example supports the concept of hybrid surgery as a therapeutic approach capable of extending traditional surgical indications with improved patients' outcomes.

Objectives: Infective endocarditis (IE) with extensive peri-annular abscesses and aortic root involvement is a life-threatening disease. Aortic root replacement with a valved conduit is the most common intervention in this setting and represents a serious challenge for the surgeon. In the present two-center study we analyzed early and midterm outcomes of a high-risk series of IE patients undergoing aortic root reconstruction with a sub-annular implantation of a totally biological valved conduit at our centers., Methods: The series comprised 29 patients (18 males, mean age: 72.3 ± 10.1 years) operated at "Lancisi Cardiovascular Center" of Ancona and "Pasquinucci Heart Hospital" of Massa, Italy, between May 2016 and October 2019. All patients had undergone a previous cardiac surgery. Median Euroscore-II was 12.6%. Following aggressive debridement, a Bioconduit was implanted using a sub-annular implantation technique in all cases., Results: Thirty-day mortality was 13.8% (n = 4). Multiorgan failure was cause of death in all cases. Respiratory complications occurred in eight patients (27.6%). Renal complications requiring temporary or permanent dialysis occurred in six (20.7%) and two (6.9%) patients, respectively. Mortality and morbidity were not related to the surgical approach. At 1-year follow-up three patients died and no patients underwent reoperation neither reported endocarditis of the biological conduit., Conclusion: Considered the high-risk profile of the study cohort, our results suggest safety and efficacy of our approach at 1-year. Indeed, we contend that our subannular implantation of a 100% pericardial valved conduit, allowing an effective abscess exclusion and a conduit anchoring to healthy tissues, can reduce the risk of reinfection and dehiscence., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: The introduction of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (AVR) mandates attention to outcomes after surgical AVR (SAVR). The aim of this study was to assess 1-year outcomes in a contemporary large cohort of patients undergoing AVR., Methods: Data from 520 patients who underwent isolated SAVR between October 2016 and April 2019 were prospectively collected., Results: The mean age of the study population was 72.8 ± 10.1 years and the average EuroSCORE II was 1.8 ± 1.5%. SAVR was performed using minimally invasive approaches (MI-AVR) in 306 patients (58.9%). However, the rate of MI-AVR considerably increased over the observational period from 47.9% to 86.7% (p<0.001). MI-AVR patients received rapid deployment valves in 40% of cases, minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation system in 34.4% and ultra fast track anesthetic management with table extubation in 38.2%. Overall 30-day mortality was 0.4% (n=2). The rates of postoperative stroke and atrioventricular block requiring pacemaker implantation were 0.6% (n=3) and 3.8% (n=20), respectively. At 1 year, the estimated survival, stroke and rehospitalization rates were 97.3%, 1% and 4.5%, respectively. Overall, the estimated incidence of the composite endpoint - death, stroke and rehospitalization - was 7%., Conclusions: Contemporary SAVR in a high-volume center yields excellent clinical outcomes with very low mortality and morbidity. In this setting, the extensive use of minimally invasive approaches combined with the modern techniques and technologies demonstrated to improve clinical outcomes and increase patient and family satisfaction.

Objectives: If mitral valve repair is not feasible, mitral valve replacement remains the only option. Based on our overall experience with the On-X mitral valve, the aim of this study was to investigate early and late outcomes after mitral valve replacement using this latest generation prosthesis., Methods: From 1998 to 2016, 600 patients received an On-X prosthesis in the mitral position. Of them, we excluded all patients who had combined aortic procedures and retrospectively analysed 318 consecutive patients who had a mitral valve replacement. Associated procedures (53.5%) were tricuspid valve repair, coronary artery bypass graft and the maze procedure. The mean follow-up time was 5.6 ± 4.0 years., Results: The overall hospital mortality rate was 4.4%, including acute cases of ischaemic mitral regurgitation (9.4%) and infective endocarditis (9.4%). Survival rates at 1, 3, 5 and 10 years were 97.8 ± 1.0%, 92.4 ± 1.7%, 88.4 ± 2.2% and 70.9 ± 4.0%, respectively. Independent predictors of late mortality were hypertension [hazard ratio (HR) 1.91; P = 0.027], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR 2.91; P = 0.003) and chronic renal failure (HR 5.27; P < 0.001). Freedom from reoperation was 99.3 ± 0.5%, 98.4 ± 0.8%, 97.2 ± 1.2% and 92.5 ± 2.4% at 1, 3, 5 and 10 years, respectively. At follow-up, 8.5% events were recognized as thromboembolic or haemorrhagic events; freedom from events related to anticoagulation therapy at 1, 3, 5 and 10 years was 99.0 ± 0.6%, 96.8 ± 1.1%, 93.7 ± 1.8% and 89.0 ± 2.7%, respectively., Conclusions: According to the results of this observational study, the unique design of the On-X valve works well with mitral valve diseases of various aetiologies, especially in cases with an unfavourable anatomy. This prosthesis also guarantees safe long-term durability associated with a low incidence of thromboembolism.